Effect of JAK inhibitors on the three forms of bone damage in autoimmune arthritis: joint erosion, periarticular osteopenia, and systemic bone loss.

Masatsugu Komagamine, Noriko Komatsu, Rui Ling, Kazuo Okamoto, Shi Tianshu, Kotaro Matsuda, Tsutomu Takeuchi, Yuko Kaneko, Hiroshi Takayanagi
{"title":"Effect of JAK inhibitors on the three forms of bone damage in autoimmune arthritis: joint erosion, periarticular osteopenia, and systemic bone loss.","authors":"Masatsugu Komagamine, Noriko Komatsu, Rui Ling, Kazuo Okamoto, Shi Tianshu, Kotaro Matsuda, Tsutomu Takeuchi, Yuko Kaneko, Hiroshi Takayanagi","doi":"10.1186/s41232-023-00293-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The types of bone damage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) include joint erosion, periarticular osteoporosis, and systemic osteoporosis. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors ameliorate inflammation and joint erosion in RA, but their effect on the three types of bone loss have not been reportedly explored in depth. We aimed to clarify how JAK inhibitors influence the various types of bone loss in arthritis by modulating osteoclastic bone resorption and/or osteoblastic bone formation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) mice were treated with a JAK inhibitor after the onset of arthritis. Micro-computed tomography (μCT) and histological analyses (bone morphometric analyses) on the erosive calcaneocuboid joint, periarticular bone (distal femur or proximal tibia), and vertebrae were performed. The effect of four different JAK inhibitors on osteoclastogenesis under various conditions was examined in vitro.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The JAK inhibitor ameliorated joint erosion, periarticular osteopenia and systemic bone loss. It reduced the osteoclast number in all the three types of bone damage. The JAK inhibitor enhanced osteoblastic bone formation in the calcaneus distal to inflammatory synovium in the calcaneocuboid joints, periarticular region of the tibia and vertebrae, but not the inflamed calcaneocuboid joint. All the JAK inhibitors suppressed osteoclastogenesis in vitro to a similar extent in the presence of osteoblastic cells. Most of the JAK inhibitors abrogated the suppressive effect of Th1 cells on osteoclastogenesis by inhibiting IFN-γ signaling in osteoclast precursor cells, while a JAK inhibitor did not affect this effect due to less ability to inhibit IFN-γ signaling.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The JAK inhibitor suppressed joint erosion mainly by inhibiting osteoclastogenesis, while it ameliorated periarticular osteopenia and systemic bone loss by both inhibiting osteoclastogenesis and promoting osteoblastogenesis. These results indicate that the effect of JAK inhibitors on osteoclastogenesis and osteoblastogenesis depends on the bone damage type and the affected bone area. In vitro studies suggest that while JAK inhibitors inhibit osteoclastic bone resorption, their effects on osteoclastogenesis in inflammatory environments vary depending on the cytokine milieu, JAK selectivity and cytokine signaling specificity. The findings reported here should contribute to the strategic use of antirheumatic drugs against structural damages in RA.</p>","PeriodicalId":94041,"journal":{"name":"Inflammation and regeneration","volume":"43 1","pages":"44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10507845/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inflammation and regeneration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41232-023-00293-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The types of bone damage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) include joint erosion, periarticular osteoporosis, and systemic osteoporosis. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors ameliorate inflammation and joint erosion in RA, but their effect on the three types of bone loss have not been reportedly explored in depth. We aimed to clarify how JAK inhibitors influence the various types of bone loss in arthritis by modulating osteoclastic bone resorption and/or osteoblastic bone formation.

Methods: Collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) mice were treated with a JAK inhibitor after the onset of arthritis. Micro-computed tomography (μCT) and histological analyses (bone morphometric analyses) on the erosive calcaneocuboid joint, periarticular bone (distal femur or proximal tibia), and vertebrae were performed. The effect of four different JAK inhibitors on osteoclastogenesis under various conditions was examined in vitro.

Results: The JAK inhibitor ameliorated joint erosion, periarticular osteopenia and systemic bone loss. It reduced the osteoclast number in all the three types of bone damage. The JAK inhibitor enhanced osteoblastic bone formation in the calcaneus distal to inflammatory synovium in the calcaneocuboid joints, periarticular region of the tibia and vertebrae, but not the inflamed calcaneocuboid joint. All the JAK inhibitors suppressed osteoclastogenesis in vitro to a similar extent in the presence of osteoblastic cells. Most of the JAK inhibitors abrogated the suppressive effect of Th1 cells on osteoclastogenesis by inhibiting IFN-γ signaling in osteoclast precursor cells, while a JAK inhibitor did not affect this effect due to less ability to inhibit IFN-γ signaling.

Conclusions: The JAK inhibitor suppressed joint erosion mainly by inhibiting osteoclastogenesis, while it ameliorated periarticular osteopenia and systemic bone loss by both inhibiting osteoclastogenesis and promoting osteoblastogenesis. These results indicate that the effect of JAK inhibitors on osteoclastogenesis and osteoblastogenesis depends on the bone damage type and the affected bone area. In vitro studies suggest that while JAK inhibitors inhibit osteoclastic bone resorption, their effects on osteoclastogenesis in inflammatory environments vary depending on the cytokine milieu, JAK selectivity and cytokine signaling specificity. The findings reported here should contribute to the strategic use of antirheumatic drugs against structural damages in RA.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
JAK抑制剂对自身免疫性关节炎中三种形式的骨损伤的影响:关节侵蚀、关节周围骨质减少和全身性骨丢失。
背景:类风湿性关节炎(RA)的骨损伤类型包括关节侵蚀、关节周围骨质疏松和全身性骨质疏松。Janus激酶(JAK)抑制剂可以改善RA的炎症和关节侵蚀,但据报道,它们对三种类型的骨丢失的影响尚未深入研究。我们旨在阐明JAK抑制剂如何通过调节破骨细胞骨吸收和/或成骨细胞骨形成来影响关节炎中各种类型的骨丢失。方法:用JAK抑制剂治疗关节炎(CIA)小鼠。对侵蚀性跟骨关节、关节周围骨(股骨远端或胫骨近端)和椎骨进行了显微计算机断层扫描(μCT)和组织学分析(骨形态计量学分析)。在体外检测了四种不同的JAK抑制剂在不同条件下对破骨细胞生成的影响。结果:JAK抑制剂改善了关节侵蚀、关节周围骨质减少和全身骨丢失。在所有三种类型的骨损伤中,它都减少了破骨细胞的数量。JAK抑制剂增强了跟骨中的成骨细胞骨形成,该跟骨位于跟骨关节、胫骨和椎骨的关节周围区域的炎性滑膜远端,但没有增强发炎的跟骨关节。在成骨细胞存在的情况下,所有JAK抑制剂在体外以相似的程度抑制破骨细胞生成。大多数JAK抑制剂通过抑制破骨细胞前体细胞中的IFN-γ信号传导来消除Th1细胞对破骨细胞生成的抑制作用,而JAK抑制剂由于抑制IFN-γ的能力较弱而不影响这种作用。结论:JAK抑制剂主要通过抑制破骨细胞生成来抑制关节侵蚀,同时通过抑制破细胞生成和促进成骨细胞生成改善关节周围骨质减少和系统性骨丢失。这些结果表明,JAK抑制剂对破骨细胞生成和成骨细胞生成的影响取决于骨损伤类型和受影响的骨面积。体外研究表明,虽然JAK抑制剂抑制破骨细胞性骨吸收,但它们对炎症环境中破骨细胞生成的影响因细胞因子环境、JAK选择性和细胞因子信号特异性而异。本文报道的研究结果应该有助于抗风湿病药物对RA结构损伤的战略性使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cell fusion dynamics: mechanisms of multinucleation in osteoclasts and macrophages. Designer immune cells. Macrophage depletion in inflamed rat knees prevents the activation of synovial mesenchymal stem cells by weakening Nampt and Spp1 signaling. The new era for the research on the regulation of microorganism-induced inflammation. Focusing on exosomes to overcome the existing bottlenecks of CAR-T cell therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1