Effectiveness of tubular coaxial nickel-titanium and copper nickel-titanium orthodontic aligning archwires: A randomized clinical trial

IF 1.8 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE International Orthodontics Pub Date : 2023-09-28 DOI:10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100812
Reyam M. Noori , Yassir A. Yassir
{"title":"Effectiveness of tubular coaxial nickel-titanium and copper nickel-titanium orthodontic aligning archwires: A randomized clinical trial","authors":"Reyam M. Noori ,&nbsp;Yassir A. Yassir","doi":"10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study aimed to compare tubular coaxial-NiTi and copper-NiTi orthodontic aligning archwires in terms of teeth alignment, patients’ pain perception, and root resorption.</p></div><div><h3>Subjects and methods</h3><p>Orthodontic patients aged 12 years or older, having Little's irregularity index (LII) of 5–9<!--> <!-->mm were randomly allocated to either the copper-NiTi group or tubular coaxial-NiTi group with a 1:1 allocation ratio. The archwire sequence was 0.014-inch followed by 0.018-inch for the copper-NiTi group and 0.016-inch followed by 0.018-inch for the tubular coaxial-NiTi group. Each archwire was left in place for eight weeks before progressing to the next size. Good quality impression for the lower arch before treatment (T0) and thereafter every 4 weeks up to 16 weeks was taken to measure LII. Evaluation of pain perception was performed using a visual analog scale (VAS) during the first week following each archwire insertion. Assessment of root resorption was undertaken at T0 and after 16 weeks by taking periapical radiographs for mandibular central incisors using the long cone paralleling technique.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 33 patients were randomized and selected for participation. Of those, 31 patients with a mean age of 15.45<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->2.22 who completed the trial were included in the analyses (15 patients in the copper-NiTi group and 16 patients in the tubular coaxial-NiTi group). In both groups, the irregularity index significantly decreased after 16 weeks of treatment with an overall reduction of 5.22<!--> <!-->mm for the copper-NiTi group and 6.03<!--> <!-->mm for the tubular coaxial-NiTi group. However, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. Likewise, pain perception and root resorption were not significantly different between the two study groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Both copper-NiTi and tubular coaxial-NiTi archwires were equally effective in terms of teeth alignment, patients’ pain perception, and root resorption. Consideration could be given to the cost and clinician preference when selecting an initial archwire.</p><p>Registration: the trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov on 26/05/2022 with a registration ID: <span>NCT05391542</span><svg><path></path></svg>, <span>https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05391542</span><svg><path></path></svg>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45449,"journal":{"name":"International Orthodontics","volume":"21 4","pages":"Article 100812"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1761722723000918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to compare tubular coaxial-NiTi and copper-NiTi orthodontic aligning archwires in terms of teeth alignment, patients’ pain perception, and root resorption.

Subjects and methods

Orthodontic patients aged 12 years or older, having Little's irregularity index (LII) of 5–9 mm were randomly allocated to either the copper-NiTi group or tubular coaxial-NiTi group with a 1:1 allocation ratio. The archwire sequence was 0.014-inch followed by 0.018-inch for the copper-NiTi group and 0.016-inch followed by 0.018-inch for the tubular coaxial-NiTi group. Each archwire was left in place for eight weeks before progressing to the next size. Good quality impression for the lower arch before treatment (T0) and thereafter every 4 weeks up to 16 weeks was taken to measure LII. Evaluation of pain perception was performed using a visual analog scale (VAS) during the first week following each archwire insertion. Assessment of root resorption was undertaken at T0 and after 16 weeks by taking periapical radiographs for mandibular central incisors using the long cone paralleling technique.

Results

A total of 33 patients were randomized and selected for participation. Of those, 31 patients with a mean age of 15.45 ± 2.22 who completed the trial were included in the analyses (15 patients in the copper-NiTi group and 16 patients in the tubular coaxial-NiTi group). In both groups, the irregularity index significantly decreased after 16 weeks of treatment with an overall reduction of 5.22 mm for the copper-NiTi group and 6.03 mm for the tubular coaxial-NiTi group. However, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. Likewise, pain perception and root resorption were not significantly different between the two study groups.

Conclusions

Both copper-NiTi and tubular coaxial-NiTi archwires were equally effective in terms of teeth alignment, patients’ pain perception, and root resorption. Consideration could be given to the cost and clinician preference when selecting an initial archwire.

Registration: the trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov on 26/05/2022 with a registration ID: NCT05391542, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05391542.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
管状同轴镍钛和铜镍钛正畸矫正弓丝的疗效:一项随机临床试验。
背景:本研究旨在比较管状同轴NiTi和铜NiTi正畸排列弓丝在牙齿排列、患者疼痛感知和牙根吸收方面的差异。受试者和方法:年龄在12岁及以上、利特尔不规则指数(LII)为5-9mm的正畸患者按1:1的分配比例随机分为铜镍钛组或管状同轴镍钛组。对于铜NiTi组,弓丝序列为0.014英寸,然后为0.018英寸,对于管状同轴NiTi组为0.016英寸,然后是0.018英寸。每根弓丝都放置八周,然后再制成下一个尺寸。在治疗前(T0)和治疗后每4周至16周对下足弓进行良好质量的印模测量LII。在每次弓丝插入后的第一周,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)对疼痛感知进行评估。在T0和16周后,通过使用长锥平行技术拍摄下颌中切牙的根尖周x线片来评估牙根吸收。结果:共有33名患者被随机选择参加。其中,31名完成试验的平均年龄为15.45±2.22的患者被纳入分析(铜镍钛组15名患者和管状同轴镍钛组16名患者)。在两组中,治疗16周后,不规则指数均显著下降,铜镍钛组整体下降5.22mm,管状同轴镍钛组总体下降6.03mm。然而,两组之间的差异没有统计学意义。同样,两个研究组之间的疼痛感知和牙根吸收没有显著差异。结论:铜镍钛和管状同轴镍钛弓丝在牙齿对齐、患者疼痛感知和牙根吸收方面同样有效。在选择初始弓丝时,可以考虑成本和临床医生的偏好。注册:该试验于2022年5月26日在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,注册ID为NCT05391542,https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05391542.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Orthodontics
International Orthodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
71
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Une revue de référence dans le domaine de orthodontie et des disciplines frontières Your reference in dentofacial orthopedics International Orthodontics adresse aux orthodontistes, aux dentistes, aux stomatologistes, aux chirurgiens maxillo-faciaux et aux plasticiens de la face, ainsi quà leurs assistant(e)s. International Orthodontics is addressed to orthodontists, dentists, stomatologists, maxillofacial surgeons and facial plastic surgeons, as well as their assistants.
期刊最新文献
Orthodontic treatment of deep bite in mixed dentition and/or early permanent dentition: What about stability? - A systematic review. Comparison of self-perception in relation to the normative need for orthodontic treatment in a population of dental students in Brazil: A cross-sectional study. The quality of orthognathic surgery information on social media: A scoping review. Management of facial asymmetry assisted with digitally designed surgical guide for 3-dimensional maxillary repositioning: A case report. Can fluoxetine influence orthodontic tooth movement? A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on animal models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1