Comparison of reminder-preference test to difference and preference tests: An affective approach yielding d-prime results for sensory difference and preference.

Min-A Kim, Myung-Shin Kim, Ye-Jin Lee, Hye-Seong Lee
{"title":"Comparison of reminder-preference test to difference and preference tests: An affective approach yielding d-prime results for sensory difference and preference.","authors":"Min-A Kim,&nbsp;Myung-Shin Kim,&nbsp;Ye-Jin Lee,&nbsp;Hye-Seong Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Preserving the sensory characteristics of reformulated products is crucial for a successful market launch. This underscores the need for precise measurement of consumer perceptions regarding sensory differences and preferences. One approach to assess these aspects is through the utilization of the reminder-preference test, an affective difference-preference test employing the A-Not A with the reminder (A-Not AR) test design. This test measures sensory differences and preferences by employing a consolidated d' index rooted in signal detection theory and Thurstonian modeling. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of the reminder-preference test in measuring the degree of sensory differences and interpreting their relevance concerning consumer preference. To achieve this, the test was compared with both the A-Not AR difference test and the 2-alternative choice (2-AC) preference test. A lemon-lime-flavored carbonated drink and two types of reformulated samples were tested. Young female adult subjects were randomly divided into three groups. Each took one of the following three tests: the reminder-preference test, the reminder test of A-Not AR, or the 2-AC preference test. The reference framing in the reminder-preference and reminder tests was preceded by subjects watching the product's advertisement to assist them in framing evaluative criteria. This would also facilitate memorizing the perception of the reference product. Test sensitivity in reminder-preference matched reminder and 2-AC tests for sensory differences and preferences. Affective framing enhanced sensitivity to sensory differences resulting in a higher d' value of the sensory difference than the preference. From the results, it was possible to interpret that the measured sensory differences did not affect consumer preference. The test also illuminated brand marketing effects on preferences through branded reference comparison. Thus, the reminder-preference test shows potential as an efficient sensory method to measure sensory differences and the preference of consumers, while concurrently measuring the effects of marketing on the consumers. Therefore, it can assist in making efficient business decisions regarding product reformulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94010,"journal":{"name":"Food research international (Ottawa, Ont.)","volume":"173 Pt 2","pages":"113441"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food research international (Ottawa, Ont.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Preserving the sensory characteristics of reformulated products is crucial for a successful market launch. This underscores the need for precise measurement of consumer perceptions regarding sensory differences and preferences. One approach to assess these aspects is through the utilization of the reminder-preference test, an affective difference-preference test employing the A-Not A with the reminder (A-Not AR) test design. This test measures sensory differences and preferences by employing a consolidated d' index rooted in signal detection theory and Thurstonian modeling. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of the reminder-preference test in measuring the degree of sensory differences and interpreting their relevance concerning consumer preference. To achieve this, the test was compared with both the A-Not AR difference test and the 2-alternative choice (2-AC) preference test. A lemon-lime-flavored carbonated drink and two types of reformulated samples were tested. Young female adult subjects were randomly divided into three groups. Each took one of the following three tests: the reminder-preference test, the reminder test of A-Not AR, or the 2-AC preference test. The reference framing in the reminder-preference and reminder tests was preceded by subjects watching the product's advertisement to assist them in framing evaluative criteria. This would also facilitate memorizing the perception of the reference product. Test sensitivity in reminder-preference matched reminder and 2-AC tests for sensory differences and preferences. Affective framing enhanced sensitivity to sensory differences resulting in a higher d' value of the sensory difference than the preference. From the results, it was possible to interpret that the measured sensory differences did not affect consumer preference. The test also illuminated brand marketing effects on preferences through branded reference comparison. Thus, the reminder-preference test shows potential as an efficient sensory method to measure sensory differences and the preference of consumers, while concurrently measuring the effects of marketing on the consumers. Therefore, it can assist in making efficient business decisions regarding product reformulations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提醒偏好测试与差异和偏好测试的比较:一种产生感觉差异和偏好d素数结果的情感方法。
保持重新配方产品的感官特性对于成功推向市场至关重要。这强调了精确测量消费者对感官差异和偏好的感知的必要性。评估这些方面的一种方法是通过使用提醒偏好测试,这是一种情感差异偏好测试,采用A-Not A和提醒(A-Not AR)测试设计。该测试通过采用植根于信号检测理论和瑟斯顿模型的综合d’指数来测量感官差异和偏好。本研究的目的是评估提醒偏好测试在测量感官差异程度和解释其与消费者偏好的相关性方面的有效性。为了实现这一点,将该测试与A-Not AR差异测试和2-替代选择(2-AC)偏好测试进行了比较。一种柠檬酸橙口味的碳酸饮料和两种重新配方的样品进行了测试。年轻女性成年受试者被随机分为三组。每个人都参加了以下三项测试中的一项:提醒偏好测试、A-Not AR的提醒测试或2-AC偏好测试。在提醒偏好和提醒测试中的参考框架之前,受试者观看产品广告,以帮助他们制定评估标准。这也将有助于记忆对参考产品的感知。提醒偏好的敏感性测试与感官差异和偏好的提醒和2-AC测试相匹配。情感框架增强了对感觉差异的敏感性,导致感觉差异的d'值高于偏好。根据结果,可以解释测量的感官差异不会影响消费者的偏好。该测试还通过品牌参考比较阐明了品牌营销对偏好的影响。因此,提醒偏好测试显示出作为一种有效的感官方法的潜力,可以测量消费者的感官差异和偏好,同时测量营销对消费者的影响。因此,它可以帮助做出关于产品重新配方的有效商业决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An optimized 3D-printed capsule scaffold utilizing artificial neural network for the targeted delivery of chlorogenic acid to the colon. Analysis of commercial fetal bovine serum (FBS) and its substitutes in the development of cultured meat. Analytical determination of tryptoquialanines A and B: Ensuring the quality and safety of orange juices. Assessment of quality and safety aspects of homemade and commercial baby foods. Bacterial community succession and volatile compound changes in Xinjiang smoked horsemeat sausage during fermentation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1