Differential blockade, comparative study of different ropivacaine concentrations (0.75%; 0.2%; 0.12%) for ultrasound guided sciatic and femoral nerve blocks in calves: Prospective cross-over study

IF 1.9 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Veterinary and Animal Science Pub Date : 2023-09-09 DOI:10.1016/j.vas.2023.100314
Marcos Paulo Antunes de Lima , Renata Andrade Silva , Patrícia de Castro Duarte , Pablo Ezequiel Otero , Rafael Resende Faleiros , Suzane Lilian Beier
{"title":"Differential blockade, comparative study of different ropivacaine concentrations (0.75%; 0.2%; 0.12%) for ultrasound guided sciatic and femoral nerve blocks in calves: Prospective cross-over study","authors":"Marcos Paulo Antunes de Lima ,&nbsp;Renata Andrade Silva ,&nbsp;Patrícia de Castro Duarte ,&nbsp;Pablo Ezequiel Otero ,&nbsp;Rafael Resende Faleiros ,&nbsp;Suzane Lilian Beier","doi":"10.1016/j.vas.2023.100314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Pharmacodynamic understanding of the different local anesthetic concentrations allows adapting their use to diverse clinical/surgical procedures, such as intraoperative and/or postoperative analgesia. A crossover study was performed, where 6 calves (5 male and 1 female), weighing 120 ± 28 Kg, were subjected to combined sciatic and femoral nerve block using three ropivacaine concentrations. The treatments were: R0.75, using 0.75% ropivacaine; R0.2, 0.2% ropivacaine; and R0.12%, 0.12% ropivacaine. All treatments were performed with ultrasound and neurostimulation assistance, and a volume of 0.1 mL/kg of the respective local anesthetic solution was administered in each block point. The sites of mechanical nociceptive threshold (MNT) evaluation were based on the calf pelvic limb dermatomes. The proportion between desensitized areas, MNT elevation time and level of ataxia were registered. Elevation of MNT occurred in 100% of the tested areas in the R0.75 and R0.2 treatments, and in 82% of the R0.12 treatment. Mean MNT elevation times were 9.5 ± 0.7 h for R0.75, 6 ± 0.8 for R.02, and 2.4 ± 2.3 for R0.12, differing significantly between all treatments. No difference was observed between MNT elevation time and ataxia duration time, in each treatment. It is concluded that the duration of sensory-motor effects is dose-dependent, but there was not possible to detect block selectivity as the concentrations was reduced. More desensitized areas and extension were obtained with the use of higher concentrations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37152,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary and Animal Science","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100314"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6a/33/main.PMC10506134.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary and Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451943X23000315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pharmacodynamic understanding of the different local anesthetic concentrations allows adapting their use to diverse clinical/surgical procedures, such as intraoperative and/or postoperative analgesia. A crossover study was performed, where 6 calves (5 male and 1 female), weighing 120 ± 28 Kg, were subjected to combined sciatic and femoral nerve block using three ropivacaine concentrations. The treatments were: R0.75, using 0.75% ropivacaine; R0.2, 0.2% ropivacaine; and R0.12%, 0.12% ropivacaine. All treatments were performed with ultrasound and neurostimulation assistance, and a volume of 0.1 mL/kg of the respective local anesthetic solution was administered in each block point. The sites of mechanical nociceptive threshold (MNT) evaluation were based on the calf pelvic limb dermatomes. The proportion between desensitized areas, MNT elevation time and level of ataxia were registered. Elevation of MNT occurred in 100% of the tested areas in the R0.75 and R0.2 treatments, and in 82% of the R0.12 treatment. Mean MNT elevation times were 9.5 ± 0.7 h for R0.75, 6 ± 0.8 for R.02, and 2.4 ± 2.3 for R0.12, differing significantly between all treatments. No difference was observed between MNT elevation time and ataxia duration time, in each treatment. It is concluded that the duration of sensory-motor effects is dose-dependent, but there was not possible to detect block selectivity as the concentrations was reduced. More desensitized areas and extension were obtained with the use of higher concentrations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
差异阻断,不同罗哌卡因浓度(0.75%;0.2%;0.12%)用于超声引导的小腿坐骨和股神经阻滞:前瞻性交叉研究
了解不同局部麻醉浓度的药效学,可以使其适应不同的临床/外科手术,如术中和/或术后镇痛。进行了一项交叉研究,6头体重为120±28 Kg的小牛(5公1母)使用三种浓度的罗哌卡因进行坐骨和股神经联合阻滞。处理方法为:R0.75, 0.75%罗哌卡因;R0.2, 0.2%罗哌卡因;R0.12%,罗哌卡因0.12%。所有治疗均在超声和神经刺激辅助下进行,每个阻滞点分别给予0.1 mL/kg的局麻溶液。机械性伤害知觉阈值(MNT)评价位点以小腿骨盆肢皮节为基础。记录脱敏区、MNT升高时间和共济失调程度之间的比例。在R0.75和R0.2处理下,100%的试验区出现MNT升高,R0.12处理中,82%的试验区出现MNT升高。R0.75组平均MNT抬高时间为9.5±0.7 h, r02组为6±0.8 h, R0.12组为2.4±2.3 h,差异有统计学意义。各治疗组MNT升高时间和共济失调持续时间无差异。结果表明,感觉-运动效应的持续时间是剂量依赖性的,但随着浓度的降低,不可能检测到阻滞选择性。浓度越高,脱敏面积越大,脱敏范围越广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary and Animal Science
Veterinary and Animal Science Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
47 days
期刊最新文献
Comparison of two methods of extracting bull epididymal spermatozoa Cattle, sheep, and goat humoral immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 Effect of vaccine diluents on the colonization of Salmonella Typhimurium vaccine in chickens A meta-analysis of genetic estimates for economically important traits in ducks Assessment of Pedicle screw-Rod implantation as an external fixation method for tibial osteotomy in a canine model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1