Systematic Review Protocol to Evaluate the Evidence Informing the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report: Implementation Strategies for Older Adults.

Journal of healthy eating and active living Pub Date : 2023-08-01 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01
Alison Vaux-Bjerke, Deborah H John, Katrina L Piercy
{"title":"Systematic Review Protocol to Evaluate the Evidence Informing the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report: Implementation Strategies for Older Adults.","authors":"Alison Vaux-Bjerke,&nbsp;Deborah H John,&nbsp;Katrina L Piercy","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The <i>Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans</i> (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical activity just 12.8% of those ages 65 and older meet the Guidelines. To address this, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) developed a Midcourse Report focused on effective strategies to improve older adult physical activity behaviors. The first step in this process was a systematic literature review. A literature review team was contracted to examine the evidence on key settings and effective behavioral intervention strategies, as well as effective policy, systems, and environmental (PSE) approaches, to improve physical activity among older adults. The PSE search employed an equity-centered framework adapted to researching PSE approaches for improving physical activity outcomes in older adults. Sixteen thousand eight hundred and eighty-three titles and abstracts were screened, and 734 full articles were reviewed for inclusion. Of those, 64 original research articles were included for the final review to answer two questions, one (plus 5 sub-questions) focused on Settings/Strategies literature (45 studies) and one (plus 2 sub-questions) focused on PSE literature (19 studies). The literature review process identified key settings and evidence-based strategies to support older adults in becoming more physically active, and provides a foundation for the <i>Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report: Implementation Strategies for Older Adults</i>. More research is needed to address how factors related to equity and psychosocial constructs influence physical activity behaviors among older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":73774,"journal":{"name":"Journal of healthy eating and active living","volume":"3 1","pages":"36-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/90/47/jheal-3-1-36.PMC10546940.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of healthy eating and active living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical activity just 12.8% of those ages 65 and older meet the Guidelines. To address this, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) developed a Midcourse Report focused on effective strategies to improve older adult physical activity behaviors. The first step in this process was a systematic literature review. A literature review team was contracted to examine the evidence on key settings and effective behavioral intervention strategies, as well as effective policy, systems, and environmental (PSE) approaches, to improve physical activity among older adults. The PSE search employed an equity-centered framework adapted to researching PSE approaches for improving physical activity outcomes in older adults. Sixteen thousand eight hundred and eighty-three titles and abstracts were screened, and 734 full articles were reviewed for inclusion. Of those, 64 original research articles were included for the final review to answer two questions, one (plus 5 sub-questions) focused on Settings/Strategies literature (45 studies) and one (plus 2 sub-questions) focused on PSE literature (19 studies). The literature review process identified key settings and evidence-based strategies to support older adults in becoming more physically active, and provides a foundation for the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report: Implementation Strategies for Older Adults. More research is needed to address how factors related to equity and psychosocial constructs influence physical activity behaviors among older adults.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估美国中期体育活动指南证据的系统审查方案报告:老年人的实施策略。
《美国人体育活动指南》建议老年人尽可能活跃。然而,尽管有充分的证据表明体育活动的好处,但在65岁及以上的人群中,只有12.8%的人符合指南。为了解决这一问题,美国卫生与公众服务部(HHS)制定了一份中期报告,重点关注改善老年人体育活动行为的有效策略。这一过程的第一步是系统的文献综述。一个文献审查小组签约审查关键环境和有效行为干预策略的证据,以及有效的政策、系统和环境(PSE)方法,以改善老年人的体育活动。PSE搜索采用了一个以公平为中心的框架,适用于研究改善老年人体育活动结果的PSE方法。筛选了一万六千八百八十三个标题和摘要,并审查了734篇完整的文章以供收录。其中,64篇原创研究文章被纳入最终审查,以回答两个问题,一篇(加上5个子问题)专注于设置/策略文献(45项研究),一份(加上2个子问题)聚焦于PSE文献(19项研究)。文献综述过程确定了支持老年人进行更多体育活动的关键环境和循证策略,并为《美国中期体育活动指南报告:老年人实施策略》奠定了基础。需要更多的研究来解决与公平和心理社会结构相关的因素如何影响老年人的体育活动行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adult Sports Participation and Physical Activity: How About Curling? Black Girls as Transformative Leaders in Physical Activity Programs. Brownfields to Healthfields: A Retrospective Ripple Effect Mapping Evaluation in Three Rural Communities. Complete Highway Removal vs. Highway Removal to Boulevards vs. Caps: Redressing Past Wrongs while Addressing the Decay of America's Most Ambitious Public Works Project. Developing translational products for adapting evidence-based physical activity interventions in rural communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1