MODERN TRENDS OF CHANGES IN THE MICROBIOTA OF UROGENITAL SYSTEM IN PATIENTS WITH UROLITHIASIS.

Q3 Medicine Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.36740/Merkur202304108
Vira I Fedorchenko, Galina A Loban, Olga V Gancho, Tetiana V Ivakhniuk, Natalia A Bagnuk, Alina O Dudar, Ninel P Kovalenko, Nellia O Bobrova
{"title":"MODERN TRENDS OF CHANGES IN THE MICROBIOTA OF UROGENITAL SYSTEM IN PATIENTS WITH UROLITHIASIS.","authors":"Vira I Fedorchenko,&nbsp;Galina A Loban,&nbsp;Olga V Gancho,&nbsp;Tetiana V Ivakhniuk,&nbsp;Natalia A Bagnuk,&nbsp;Alina O Dudar,&nbsp;Ninel P Kovalenko,&nbsp;Nellia O Bobrova","doi":"10.36740/Merkur202304108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Aim: Analysis of trends in the microbial communities of the genitourinary system in patients with urolithiasis.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Materials and Methods: 165 urine samples from patients with urolithiasis was examined. The quantitative isolation of microflora was carried out using the bacteriological method. Microorganisms were identified using API biochemical test systems (bioMerieux, France). The percentage of the various types of microorganisms was determined. The reliability of differences in the frequency of various types of microorganisms isolation in a monoculture and the composition of microbial associations was determined by two-field tables with Fisher's Exact criterion. The GraphPad Prism 7 software was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results: 198 bacterial cultures of various types were isolated. In one case, a Candida culture was isolated. E. faecalis was the most frequently isolated culture (29.1% of the isolated strains number); E. coli (18.1% of the total number of isolated cultures; K. pneumoniae (11.1%). There were no significant differences in the rate of E. faecalis compared to E. coli. K. pneumonia was isolated significantly less frequently than E. faecalis. These types of microorganisms were also leaders in the formation of bacterial mixes. In addition, these species are involved in the urease activity of bacteria (directly or indirectly), which contributes to the formation of stones in the genitourinary system.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conclusions: E. faecalis is the species most often isolated from patients with purulent-inflammatory processes in patients with urolithiasis, both in the case of mono-infection and as part of mixed bacterial cultures.</p>","PeriodicalId":39518,"journal":{"name":"Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski","volume":"51 4","pages":"346-349"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36740/Merkur202304108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Aim: Analysis of trends in the microbial communities of the genitourinary system in patients with urolithiasis.

Patients and methods: Materials and Methods: 165 urine samples from patients with urolithiasis was examined. The quantitative isolation of microflora was carried out using the bacteriological method. Microorganisms were identified using API biochemical test systems (bioMerieux, France). The percentage of the various types of microorganisms was determined. The reliability of differences in the frequency of various types of microorganisms isolation in a monoculture and the composition of microbial associations was determined by two-field tables with Fisher's Exact criterion. The GraphPad Prism 7 software was used.

Results: Results: 198 bacterial cultures of various types were isolated. In one case, a Candida culture was isolated. E. faecalis was the most frequently isolated culture (29.1% of the isolated strains number); E. coli (18.1% of the total number of isolated cultures; K. pneumoniae (11.1%). There were no significant differences in the rate of E. faecalis compared to E. coli. K. pneumonia was isolated significantly less frequently than E. faecalis. These types of microorganisms were also leaders in the formation of bacterial mixes. In addition, these species are involved in the urease activity of bacteria (directly or indirectly), which contributes to the formation of stones in the genitourinary system.

Conclusion: Conclusions: E. faecalis is the species most often isolated from patients with purulent-inflammatory processes in patients with urolithiasis, both in the case of mono-infection and as part of mixed bacterial cultures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尿路结石患者泌尿生殖系统微生物群变化的现代趋势。
目的:分析尿石症患者泌尿生殖系统微生物群落的变化趋势。患者与方法:材料与方法:对165例尿石症患者的尿液进行检查。采用细菌学方法对微生物区系进行了定量分离。使用API生物化学测试系统(bioMerieux,法国)鉴定微生物。测定了各种类型的微生物的百分比。采用Fisher精确标准,通过两个字段表确定了单一栽培中各种类型微生物分离频率和微生物组合组成差异的可靠性。使用GraphPad Prism 7软件。结果:共分离到198株不同类型的细菌培养物。在一个病例中,分离出念珠菌培养物。粪大肠杆菌是最常见的分离培养物(占分离菌株数的29.1%);大肠杆菌(占分离培养物总数的18.1%;肺炎克雷伯菌(11.1%)。与大肠杆菌相比,粪便大肠杆菌的感染率没有显著差异。K.肺炎的分离频率明显低于粪便大肠杆菌。这些类型的微生物也是细菌混合物形成的领导者。此外,这些物种(直接或间接)参与细菌的脲酶活性,这有助于泌尿生殖系统中结石的形成。结论:无论是在单一感染的情况下还是在混合细菌培养的情况下,粪大肠杆菌都是最常从尿石症患者的化脓性炎症过程中分离出来的物种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski
Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of early postoperative results of transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement with a biological prosthesis. Coronavirus infection and systemic inflammatory reaction syndrome. Empathy, self-compassion, and depression correlations among health professionals in Northern Greece. Epidemiological parameters and monitoring of analysis of treatment of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus in insulin pump therapy with modified educational program. Evaluation of potential prevalence of onconeural antibodies in women with breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1