Quantitative Differences in Rumen Epithelium Proteins in Lambs Fed Wheat, Perennial Wheat, or Perennial Wheat plus Lucerne.

IF 4 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Proteomes Pub Date : 2023-09-20 DOI:10.3390/proteomes11030027
Jude Jessie Bond, Gordon Refshauge, Matthew T Newell, Benjamin W B Holman, David Wheeler, Serey Woodgate, Karthik S Kamath, Richard C Hayes
{"title":"Quantitative Differences in Rumen Epithelium Proteins in Lambs Fed Wheat, Perennial Wheat, or Perennial Wheat plus Lucerne.","authors":"Jude Jessie Bond,&nbsp;Gordon Refshauge,&nbsp;Matthew T Newell,&nbsp;Benjamin W B Holman,&nbsp;David Wheeler,&nbsp;Serey Woodgate,&nbsp;Karthik S Kamath,&nbsp;Richard C Hayes","doi":"10.3390/proteomes11030027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The value of crops such as perennial wheat (PW) for grain and grazing compared to conventional wheat (W), or the addition of lucerne to PW (PWL) is still being determined. This research sought to determine if these diets were associated with changes in the membranebound proteins that transport nutrients in the rumen epithelium (RE). Crossbred ewes (Poll Dorset × Merino) were fed W, PW, or PWL (50:50) fresh-cut forage <i>ad libitum</i> for 4 weeks. Average daily gain (ADG; <i>p</i> < 0.001) was highest in the W-fed lambs compared to the PW and PWL. Metabolisable energy intake (MEI) was higher in lambs fed W (<i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to PW and PWL. In pairwise comparisons of the PW and PWL diet group we found protein abundance was significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.05, FDR < 0.05, Benjamini <i>p</i> < 0.05) different in fatty acid metabolism, oxidative phosphorylation, and biosynthesis of cofactors pathways. There were not any differences in protein abundance related to nutrient transport or energy metabolism in the RE between W- vs. PW- and W- vs. PWL-fed lambs. However, in the PW- vs. PWL-fed lambs, there was a difference in the level of proteins regulating the metabolism of fatty acids and energy production in the mitochondria of the rumen epithelium.</p>","PeriodicalId":20877,"journal":{"name":"Proteomes","volume":"11 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10537991/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proteomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/proteomes11030027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The value of crops such as perennial wheat (PW) for grain and grazing compared to conventional wheat (W), or the addition of lucerne to PW (PWL) is still being determined. This research sought to determine if these diets were associated with changes in the membranebound proteins that transport nutrients in the rumen epithelium (RE). Crossbred ewes (Poll Dorset × Merino) were fed W, PW, or PWL (50:50) fresh-cut forage ad libitum for 4 weeks. Average daily gain (ADG; p < 0.001) was highest in the W-fed lambs compared to the PW and PWL. Metabolisable energy intake (MEI) was higher in lambs fed W (p < 0.001) compared to PW and PWL. In pairwise comparisons of the PW and PWL diet group we found protein abundance was significantly (p < 0.05, FDR < 0.05, Benjamini p < 0.05) different in fatty acid metabolism, oxidative phosphorylation, and biosynthesis of cofactors pathways. There were not any differences in protein abundance related to nutrient transport or energy metabolism in the RE between W- vs. PW- and W- vs. PWL-fed lambs. However, in the PW- vs. PWL-fed lambs, there was a difference in the level of proteins regulating the metabolism of fatty acids and energy production in the mitochondria of the rumen epithelium.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
饲喂小麦、多年生小麦或多年生小麦加卢塞恩的羔羊瘤胃上皮蛋白质的数量差异。
与传统小麦(W)相比,多年生小麦(PW)等作物对粮食和放牧的价值,或在PW中添加苜蓿(PWL)的价值仍在确定中。这项研究试图确定这些饮食是否与瘤胃上皮(RE)中运输营养物质的膜蛋白的变化有关。杂交母羊(Poll Dorset×Merino)随意饲喂W、PW或PWL(50:50)新鲜切割饲料4周。与PW和PWL相比,W喂养的羔羊的平均日增重(ADG;p<0.001)最高。与PW和PWL相比,饲喂W的羔羊的代谢能摄入量(MEI)更高(p<0.001)。在PW和PWL饮食组的成对比较中,我们发现蛋白质丰度在脂肪酸代谢、氧化磷酸化和辅因子生物合成途径方面存在显著差异(p<0.05,FDR<0.05,Benjamini p<0.05)。在W与PW和W与PWL喂养的羔羊之间,RE中与营养运输或能量代谢相关的蛋白质丰度没有任何差异。然而,在PW与PWL喂养的羔羊中,调节瘤胃上皮线粒体中脂肪酸代谢和能量产生的蛋白质水平存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Proteomes
Proteomes Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Proteomes (ISSN 2227-7382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of proteome science. Proteomes covers the multi-disciplinary topics of structural and functional biology, protein chemistry, cell biology, methodology used for protein analysis, including mass spectrometry, protein arrays, bioinformatics, HTS assays, etc. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers. Scope: -whole proteome analysis of any organism -disease/pharmaceutical studies -comparative proteomics -protein-ligand/protein interactions -structure/functional proteomics -gene expression -methodology -bioinformatics -applications of proteomics
期刊最新文献
Structure-Based Deep Learning Framework for Modeling Human-Gut Bacterial Protein Interactions. Proteomic Comparison of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells and Normal CD34+ Bone Marrow Cells: Studies of Leukemia Cell Differentiation and Regulation of Iron Metabolism/Ferroptosis. Systems Biology of Recombinant 2G12 and 353/11 mAb Production in CHO-K1 Cell Lines at Phosphoproteome Level. Identifying Endogenous Proteins of Perennial Ryegrass (Lolium perenne) with Ex Vivo Antioxidant Activity. Differential Signaling Pathways Identified in Aqueous Humor, Anterior Capsule, and Crystalline Lens of Age-Related, Diabetic, and Post-Vitrectomy Cataract.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1