Using Twitter to Assess Stigma to Schizophrenia and Psychosis: A Qualitative Study.

Kerime Bademli, Ayten Kaya Kiliç, Mehmet Kayakuş
{"title":"Using Twitter to Assess Stigma to Schizophrenia and Psychosis: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Kerime Bademli, Ayten Kaya Kiliç, Mehmet Kayakuş","doi":"10.5080/u27280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to evaluate stigmatizing attitudes towards schizophrenia among Turkish Twitter users.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the study designed with the qualitative research method, the tweets containing the keywords \"schizophrenia\", \"schizophrenic\", \"psychotic\" and \"psychosis\" in Turkish on Twitter were collected using the Knime program. The main themes and sub-themes were created by content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The studies revealed three major themes: \"insult\", \"negative point of view\", and \"anti-stigma\". While the sub-themes of \"swearing\" and \"mocking\" were determined under the main theme of \"insult\", the sub-theme of \"false beliefs\" was determined under the theme of \"negative point of view\", and the sub-themes of \"medically appropriate\" and \"defensive\" were determined under the main theme of \"antistigma\". In the results, it was determined that the word schizophrenia was commonly used to humiliate others and used as a way of addressing with slang words or to mock and that there were stigmatizing statements revealing negative feelings and thoughts in such a way that they would be inconsistent with medical information.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study can be used to develop programs to combat stigma against schizophrenia disorder and to determine content.</p>","PeriodicalId":94262,"journal":{"name":"Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10645016/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5080/u27280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate stigmatizing attitudes towards schizophrenia among Turkish Twitter users.

Methods: In the study designed with the qualitative research method, the tweets containing the keywords "schizophrenia", "schizophrenic", "psychotic" and "psychosis" in Turkish on Twitter were collected using the Knime program. The main themes and sub-themes were created by content analysis.

Results: The studies revealed three major themes: "insult", "negative point of view", and "anti-stigma". While the sub-themes of "swearing" and "mocking" were determined under the main theme of "insult", the sub-theme of "false beliefs" was determined under the theme of "negative point of view", and the sub-themes of "medically appropriate" and "defensive" were determined under the main theme of "antistigma". In the results, it was determined that the word schizophrenia was commonly used to humiliate others and used as a way of addressing with slang words or to mock and that there were stigmatizing statements revealing negative feelings and thoughts in such a way that they would be inconsistent with medical information.

Conclusion: The results of this study can be used to develop programs to combat stigma against schizophrenia disorder and to determine content.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用Twitter评估精神分裂症和精神病的污名:一项定性研究。
目的:本研究旨在评估土耳其推特用户对精神分裂症的污名化态度。方法:在采用定性研究方法设计的研究中,使用Knime程序收集推特上包含土耳其语关键词“精神分裂症”、“精神分裂”、“神经病”和“精神病”的推文。主主题和次主题是通过内容分析创建的。结果:研究揭示了三个主要主题:“侮辱”、“负面观点”和“反污名”。“咒骂”和“嘲笑”的分主题是在“侮辱”的主主题下确定的,“虚假信仰”的分标题是在“负面观点”的主标题下确定的。研究结果表明,精神分裂症一词通常被用来羞辱他人,并被用作俚语或嘲笑的一种称呼方式,而且有污名化的言论以与医学信息不一致的方式揭示了负面的感受和想法。结论:本研究的结果可用于制定对抗精神分裂症污名化的方案和确定内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is Artificial Intelligence hallucinating? Is Artificial Intelligence hallucinating? The use of Artificial Intelligence in Psychotherapy: Practical and Ethical Aspects. And What About Secondary Catatonia? Ukraine, Crisis and Mental Health Resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1