Parity and nutrient total-tract digestibility in dairy cows during transition period

IF 1.9 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Veterinary and Animal Science Pub Date : 2023-09-06 DOI:10.1016/j.vas.2023.100313
Julio de M. Vettori , Damiano Cavallini , Melania Giammarco , Lydia Lanzoni , Oreste Vignone , Hassan Jalal , Ludovica Mammi , Paolo Pezzi , Andrea Formigoni , Isa Fusaro
{"title":"Parity and nutrient total-tract digestibility in dairy cows during transition period","authors":"Julio de M. Vettori ,&nbsp;Damiano Cavallini ,&nbsp;Melania Giammarco ,&nbsp;Lydia Lanzoni ,&nbsp;Oreste Vignone ,&nbsp;Hassan Jalal ,&nbsp;Ludovica Mammi ,&nbsp;Paolo Pezzi ,&nbsp;Andrea Formigoni ,&nbsp;Isa Fusaro","doi":"10.1016/j.vas.2023.100313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cows experience many physiological, nutritional and social changes during transition period. This study aims to evaluate the differences in nutrients total-tract digestibility (nTTD) between primiparous (PP) and multiparous (MP) cows through the transition period. From -23, -5, 0, 7, 14, and 30 days from calving a sample of feed and feces samples were collected from 25 Holstein cows (11 PP and 14 MP) as well as daily rumination time through accelerometers.</p><p>The results show that average nTTD were different (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.02) for amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber organic matter (aNDFom) and potentially digestible neutral detergent fiber (pdNDF<sub>240</sub>; 52.5 vs. 54.0 and 78.8 vs. 81.3, respectively in PP vs. MP), while no differences were found regarding pdNDF<sub>24</sub> and starch (88.5 vs. 88.6 and 95.1 vs. 96.1, respectively in PP vs. MP). Total-tract starch digestibility (TTstarchD) was different among timepoints (<em>p &lt;</em> 0.01), going from an average of 91.40 up to 97.39% of starch, on times -23 and 14, respectively. Differences in total-tract digestibility of aNDFom among timepoints (<em>p &lt;</em> 0.01) was expected because of differences in diet composition among lactating and non-lactating cows. No differences in daily rumination time (<em>p</em> = 0.92), TTstarchD and total-tract potentially digestible NDF digestibility at 24 h (TTpdNDF<sub>24</sub>D) were recorded. Our findings show that fiber digestibility during the transition period is higher in MP probably for a different ruminal retention time. These differences should be considered when formulating rations for groups with different parity number.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37152,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary and Animal Science","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100313"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10509770/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary and Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451943X23000303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cows experience many physiological, nutritional and social changes during transition period. This study aims to evaluate the differences in nutrients total-tract digestibility (nTTD) between primiparous (PP) and multiparous (MP) cows through the transition period. From -23, -5, 0, 7, 14, and 30 days from calving a sample of feed and feces samples were collected from 25 Holstein cows (11 PP and 14 MP) as well as daily rumination time through accelerometers.

The results show that average nTTD were different (p ≤ 0.02) for amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber organic matter (aNDFom) and potentially digestible neutral detergent fiber (pdNDF240; 52.5 vs. 54.0 and 78.8 vs. 81.3, respectively in PP vs. MP), while no differences were found regarding pdNDF24 and starch (88.5 vs. 88.6 and 95.1 vs. 96.1, respectively in PP vs. MP). Total-tract starch digestibility (TTstarchD) was different among timepoints (p < 0.01), going from an average of 91.40 up to 97.39% of starch, on times -23 and 14, respectively. Differences in total-tract digestibility of aNDFom among timepoints (p < 0.01) was expected because of differences in diet composition among lactating and non-lactating cows. No differences in daily rumination time (p = 0.92), TTstarchD and total-tract potentially digestible NDF digestibility at 24 h (TTpdNDF24D) were recorded. Our findings show that fiber digestibility during the transition period is higher in MP probably for a different ruminal retention time. These differences should be considered when formulating rations for groups with different parity number.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
过渡期奶牛胎次与营养物质全道消化率
奶牛在过渡时期经历了许多生理、营养和社会变化。本研究旨在评价初产奶牛和多产奶牛在过渡时期营养物质全道消化率(nTTD)的差异。在产犊后第23、第5、第0、第7、第14和第30天,分别采集25头荷斯坦奶牛(11 PP和14 MP)的饲料和粪便样本,并通过加速度计测量每日反刍时间。结果表明:淀粉酶处理的中性洗涤纤维有机物(aNDFom)和潜在可消化的中性洗涤纤维(pdNDF240;PP和MP分别为52.5 vs. 54.0和78.8 vs. 81.3),而pndf24和淀粉无差异(PP和MP分别为88.5 vs. 88.6和95.1 vs. 96.1)。全束淀粉消化率(TTstarchD)在不同时间点之间存在差异(p <0.01),淀粉含量从平均91.40上升到97.39%,分别为-23倍和- 14倍。不同时间点的全道消化率差异(p <由于泌乳奶牛和非泌乳奶牛的日粮组成差异,本试验结果的预测值为0.01)。各组日反刍时间(p = 0.92)、总淀粉含量和24 h全道潜在可消化NDF消化率(TTpdNDF24D)无显著差异。我们的研究结果表明,过渡时期的纤维消化率在MP中较高,可能是由于不同的瘤胃保留时间。在为不同胎次的群体制定口粮时,应考虑到这些差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary and Animal Science
Veterinary and Animal Science Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
47 days
期刊最新文献
Comparison of two methods of extracting bull epididymal spermatozoa Cattle, sheep, and goat humoral immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 Effect of vaccine diluents on the colonization of Salmonella Typhimurium vaccine in chickens A meta-analysis of genetic estimates for economically important traits in ducks Assessment of Pedicle screw-Rod implantation as an external fixation method for tibial osteotomy in a canine model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1