Pregnant nurses' experiences of working shifts: a qualitative systematic review.

IF 4.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JBI evidence synthesis Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.11124/JBIES-23-00184
Narumi Ooshige, Eriko Matsunaka, Shingo Ueki, Sayuka Takuma
{"title":"Pregnant nurses' experiences of working shifts: a qualitative systematic review.","authors":"Narumi Ooshige, Eriko Matsunaka, Shingo Ueki, Sayuka Takuma","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this systematic review was to synthesize the experiences of nurses who work shifts during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pregnancy is a process of rapid physical change that requires adaptation both mentally and physically. Many women continue to work during pregnancy, including in the nursing profession, but there are various risks associated with working while pregnant.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review included studies that focused on the experiences of pregnant registered nurses, regardless of their level of qualification, working shifts in any workplace, including hospitals, nursing home facilities, or clinics, in any country. Nurses not involved in direct care (eg, advanced practice nurses, administrators, educators) were excluded.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review followed the JBI methodology for qualitative systematic reviews. Published and gray literature were searched for via CINAHL (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), and Igaku Chuo Zasshi (Japan Medical Abstracts Society). No language restrictions were imposed, and the date limit was set for 2013 to 2021. Two independent reviewers performed data collection, extraction, critical appraisal, and analysis. Unequivocal and credible findings were used to develop categories, which were then synthesized to provide a set of comprehensive findings that were graded according to ConQual.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five qualitative studies were included (2 from the USA, 2 from Japan, and 1 from Korea), from which 23 findings with narrative illustrations were extracted. Of these findings, 22 were assessed as unequivocal and 1 as credible. The studies were low to moderate quality based on the JBI critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research. All studies used qualitative methodologies, including phenomenology, qualitative description, and the grounded theory approach. Results were integrated into 8 categories and 3 synthesized findings. The first synthesized finding was that nurses struggle with the physical burden of pregnancy and work environments that threaten continued pregnancy. The second was that nurses achieve work-pregnancy compatibility by disclosing their pregnancy and obtaining support. The third was that development as a nurse results from continuing to work during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pregnant nurses face a harsh work environment; the support they receive after disclosing their pregnancy allows them to balance work and pregnancy; and they feel that they grow as professionals by continuing to work even if they are pregnant. More research is needed to inform support systems for pregnant nurses.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42022309674.</p><p><strong>Supplemental digital content: </strong>A Japanese-language version of the abstract of this review is available: http://links.lww.com/SRX/A31.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"2313-2341"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-23-00184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this systematic review was to synthesize the experiences of nurses who work shifts during pregnancy.

Introduction: Pregnancy is a process of rapid physical change that requires adaptation both mentally and physically. Many women continue to work during pregnancy, including in the nursing profession, but there are various risks associated with working while pregnant.

Inclusion criteria: This review included studies that focused on the experiences of pregnant registered nurses, regardless of their level of qualification, working shifts in any workplace, including hospitals, nursing home facilities, or clinics, in any country. Nurses not involved in direct care (eg, advanced practice nurses, administrators, educators) were excluded.

Methods: The review followed the JBI methodology for qualitative systematic reviews. Published and gray literature were searched for via CINAHL (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), and Igaku Chuo Zasshi (Japan Medical Abstracts Society). No language restrictions were imposed, and the date limit was set for 2013 to 2021. Two independent reviewers performed data collection, extraction, critical appraisal, and analysis. Unequivocal and credible findings were used to develop categories, which were then synthesized to provide a set of comprehensive findings that were graded according to ConQual.

Results: Five qualitative studies were included (2 from the USA, 2 from Japan, and 1 from Korea), from which 23 findings with narrative illustrations were extracted. Of these findings, 22 were assessed as unequivocal and 1 as credible. The studies were low to moderate quality based on the JBI critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research. All studies used qualitative methodologies, including phenomenology, qualitative description, and the grounded theory approach. Results were integrated into 8 categories and 3 synthesized findings. The first synthesized finding was that nurses struggle with the physical burden of pregnancy and work environments that threaten continued pregnancy. The second was that nurses achieve work-pregnancy compatibility by disclosing their pregnancy and obtaining support. The third was that development as a nurse results from continuing to work during pregnancy.

Conclusions: Pregnant nurses face a harsh work environment; the support they receive after disclosing their pregnancy allows them to balance work and pregnancy; and they feel that they grow as professionals by continuing to work even if they are pregnant. More research is needed to inform support systems for pregnant nurses.

Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42022309674.

Supplemental digital content: A Japanese-language version of the abstract of this review is available: http://links.lww.com/SRX/A31.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孕妇护士轮班工作经验的定性系统评价。
目的:本系统综述旨在总结孕期轮班护士的经验。纳入标准:这项综述包括关注怀孕注册护士的经历的研究,无论其资质水平如何,在任何国家的任何工作场所轮班工作,包括医院、疗养院设施或诊所。未参与直接护理的护士(如高级实习护士、行政人员、教育工作者)被排除在外。方法:采用JBI方法进行定性系统评价。通过CINAHL(EBSCOhost)、MEDLINE(EBSCOhosts)、PsycINFO(EBSCOhost)、Igaku Chuo Zasshi(日本医学文摘社)和JBI Evidence Synthesis搜索已发表和灰色文献。没有语言限制,日期限制定为2013年至2021年。两名独立评审员进行了数据收集、提取、批判性评估和分析。使用不一致和可信的研究结果来开发类别,然后对这些类别进行综合,以提供一组全面的研究结果,并根据ConQual进行评分。结果:包括5项定性研究(2项来自美国,2项来自日本,1项来自韩国),从中提取了23项带有叙述性插图的研究结果。在这些调查结果中,22项被评估为明确无误,1项可信,3项不受支持。根据JBI定性研究的关键评估清单,研究质量为低至中等。所有研究都采用了定性方法,包括现象学、定性描述和扎根理论方法。结果被整合为7个类别和3个综合结果。第一个综合发现是,护士在与怀孕的身体负担和威胁继续怀孕的工作环境作斗争。第二种是护士通过披露自己的怀孕情况和获得支持来实现工作与怀孕的兼容性。第三,作为一名护士的发展源于在怀孕期间继续工作。结论:孕期护士工作环境恶劣;她们在公开怀孕后得到的支持使她们能够平衡工作和怀孕;他们觉得,即使怀孕了,他们也会继续工作,从而成长为专业人士。需要更多的研究来为他们的支持系统提供信息。评审注册:PROSPERO CRD42022309674。补充数字内容:可获得本评审摘要的日语版本[http://links.lww.com/SRX/A31]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JBI evidence synthesis
JBI evidence synthesis Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
218
期刊最新文献
User experience and adoption of automation and AI for evidence synthesis: a scoping review protocol. Real-world evaluation of inter-consensus agreement on the Murad tool for appraising the methodological quality of case reports and case series. Pelvic floor dysfunctions among people who are LGBTQIA2S+: a scoping review protocol. Health net-outcome objectives and approaches for spatial planning and development: a scoping review. Allied health interventions for preterm infants with feeding aversion: a scoping review protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1