Specimens as individuals: Four interventions and recommendations for great ape skeletal collections research and curation

IF 4.6 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Evolutionary Anthropology Pub Date : 2023-09-26 DOI:10.1002/evan.22002
Alexandra E. Kralick, Stephanie L. Canington, Andrea R. Eller, Kate McGrath
{"title":"Specimens as individuals: Four interventions and recommendations for great ape skeletal collections research and curation","authors":"Alexandra E. Kralick,&nbsp;Stephanie L. Canington,&nbsp;Andrea R. Eller,&nbsp;Kate McGrath","doi":"10.1002/evan.22002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Extensive discourse surrounds the ethics of human skeletal research and curation, but there has yet to be a similar discussion of the treatment of great ape skeletal remains, despite the clear interest in their ethical treatment when alive. Here we trace the history of apes who were killed and collected for natural history museums during the early 20th century and showcase how the guiding research questions of the colonial era continue to influence scholarship. We discuss best practices for improving industry and academic standards of research on, and the curation of, ape remains. The suggested interventions involve restoring individual identity and narrative to great apes while engaging with contextual reflexivity and decolonial theory. The resulting recommendations include contextualizing the individual, piecing individuals back together, challenging/questioning the captive-wild dichotomy, and collaborative international conversations. Our objective is to encourage a conversation regarding ethical and theoretical considerations in great ape skeletal remains research.</p>","PeriodicalId":47849,"journal":{"name":"Evolutionary Anthropology","volume":"32 6","pages":"336-355"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolutionary Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/evan.22002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extensive discourse surrounds the ethics of human skeletal research and curation, but there has yet to be a similar discussion of the treatment of great ape skeletal remains, despite the clear interest in their ethical treatment when alive. Here we trace the history of apes who were killed and collected for natural history museums during the early 20th century and showcase how the guiding research questions of the colonial era continue to influence scholarship. We discuss best practices for improving industry and academic standards of research on, and the curation of, ape remains. The suggested interventions involve restoring individual identity and narrative to great apes while engaging with contextual reflexivity and decolonial theory. The resulting recommendations include contextualizing the individual, piecing individuals back together, challenging/questioning the captive-wild dichotomy, and collaborative international conversations. Our objective is to encourage a conversation regarding ethical and theoretical considerations in great ape skeletal remains research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
个体标本:类人猿骨骼收藏研究和策展的四项干预措施和建议。
围绕着人类骨骼研究和管理的伦理问题展开了广泛的讨论,但对于类人猿骨骼遗骸的处理问题,还没有类似的讨论,尽管人们对其在世时的伦理处理显然感兴趣。在这里,我们追溯了20世纪初被杀害并被自然历史博物馆收藏的类人猿的历史,并展示了殖民时代的指导性研究问题如何继续影响学术。我们讨论了提高猿类遗骸研究和管理的行业和学术标准的最佳实践。建议的干预措施包括恢复类人猿的个人身份和叙事,同时运用语境反射性和非殖民化理论。由此产生的建议包括将个人置于情境中,将个人重新拼凑在一起,挑战/质疑被束缚的狂野二分法,以及国际合作对话。我们的目标是鼓励就类人猿骨骼遗骸研究中的伦理和理论考虑进行对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.40%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Evolutionary Anthropology is an authoritative review journal that focuses on issues of current interest in biological anthropology, paleoanthropology, archaeology, functional morphology, social biology, and bone biology — including dentition and osteology — as well as human biology, genetics, and ecology. In addition to lively, well-illustrated articles reviewing contemporary research efforts, this journal also publishes general news of relevant developments in the scientific, social, or political arenas. Reviews of noteworthy new books are also included, as are letters to the editor and listings of various conferences. The journal provides a valuable source of current information for classroom teaching and research activities in evolutionary anthropology.
期刊最新文献
A biochronological date of 3.6 million years for "Little Foot" (StW 573, Australopithecus prometheus from Sterkfontein, South Africa). The evolutionary origin of human kissing. Issue Information Issue Information Back(s) to basics: The concept of backing in stone tool technologies for tracing hominins' technical innovations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1