Use of Loss of Righting Reflex to Assess Susceptibility to Carbon Dioxide Gas in Three Mouse Strains.

Brittany A Munro, Dexter R Merenick, Julia M Gee, Daniel Sj Pang
{"title":"Use of Loss of Righting Reflex to Assess Susceptibility to Carbon Dioxide Gas in Three Mouse Strains.","authors":"Brittany A Munro, Dexter R Merenick, Julia M Gee, Daniel Sj Pang","doi":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-23-000035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Exposure to CO₂ gas is a common rodent euthanasia method. CO₂ activates nociceptors in rats and is painful to humans at concentrations equal to or greater than 32.5% The concentration of CO₂ at which rodents become unconsciousness is inadequately defined. We used loss of righting reflex (LORR) to identify the concentration at which CO₂ caused loss of consciousness in C57Bl/6, CD1 and 129P3J mice (16 females and 16 males per strain). We used a custom built, rotating, motorized cylinder to determine LORR as CO₂ concentrations were increased. Two LORR assessment methods were used: 1) a 1-Paw assessment in which the righting reflex was considered to be present if one or more paws contacted the cylinder after rotation into dorsal recumbency and 2) a 4-Paw assessment in which the righting reflex was considered to be present only if all 4 paws contacted the cylinder. LORR test data were analyzed with Probit regression and dose response curves were plotted. 1-Paw EC<sub>95</sub> values (CO₂ concentration at which LORR occurred for 95% of the population) were: C57Bl/6; 30.7%, CD1; 26.2%, 129P3J; 20.1%. The EC<sub>95</sub> for C57Bl/6 was significantly higher than that of the 129P3J mice, with no significant differences between other strains. Four-Paw EC<sub>95</sub> values were: C57Bl/6; 22.8%, CD1; 25.3%, 129P3J; 20.1%. Values for 129P3J mice were significantly lower than those of CD1 mice), with no significant difference between other strains. The EC<sub>95</sub> varied significantly between 1-Paw and 4-Paw methods only for C57Bl/6 mice. These results suggest a potential for nociception and pain to occur in some individuals of some mouse strains during CO₂ euthanasia.</p>","PeriodicalId":94111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS","volume":" ","pages":"553-558"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10772915/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-23-000035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exposure to CO₂ gas is a common rodent euthanasia method. CO₂ activates nociceptors in rats and is painful to humans at concentrations equal to or greater than 32.5% The concentration of CO₂ at which rodents become unconsciousness is inadequately defined. We used loss of righting reflex (LORR) to identify the concentration at which CO₂ caused loss of consciousness in C57Bl/6, CD1 and 129P3J mice (16 females and 16 males per strain). We used a custom built, rotating, motorized cylinder to determine LORR as CO₂ concentrations were increased. Two LORR assessment methods were used: 1) a 1-Paw assessment in which the righting reflex was considered to be present if one or more paws contacted the cylinder after rotation into dorsal recumbency and 2) a 4-Paw assessment in which the righting reflex was considered to be present only if all 4 paws contacted the cylinder. LORR test data were analyzed with Probit regression and dose response curves were plotted. 1-Paw EC95 values (CO₂ concentration at which LORR occurred for 95% of the population) were: C57Bl/6; 30.7%, CD1; 26.2%, 129P3J; 20.1%. The EC95 for C57Bl/6 was significantly higher than that of the 129P3J mice, with no significant differences between other strains. Four-Paw EC95 values were: C57Bl/6; 22.8%, CD1; 25.3%, 129P3J; 20.1%. Values for 129P3J mice were significantly lower than those of CD1 mice), with no significant difference between other strains. The EC95 varied significantly between 1-Paw and 4-Paw methods only for C57Bl/6 mice. These results suggest a potential for nociception and pain to occur in some individuals of some mouse strains during CO₂ euthanasia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用矫正反射丧失评估三种小鼠品系对二氧化碳气体的易感性。
暴露在二氧化碳气体中是一种常见的啮齿动物安乐死方法。二氧化碳激活大鼠的伤害感受器,在浓度等于或大于32.5%时对人类来说是痛苦的。啮齿动物失去意识的二氧化碳浓度定义不明确。我们使用翻正反射丧失(LORR)来确定C57Bl/6、CD1和129P3J小鼠(每个品系16只雌性和16只雄性)中CO2导致意识丧失的浓度。随着二氧化碳浓度的增加,我们使用了一个定制的旋转电动气缸来确定LORR。使用了两种LORR评估方法:1)1爪评估,其中如果一只或多只爪子在旋转到背部固定后接触到圆柱体,则认为存在翻正反射;2)4爪评估,只有当所有4只爪子都接触到圆柱体时,才认为存在翻右反射。用Probit回归分析LORR试验数据,绘制剂量-反应曲线。1-Paw EC95值(95%的群体发生LORR时的CO2浓度)为:C57Bl/6;30.7%,CD1;26.2%,129P3J;C57Bl/6小鼠的EC95显著高于129P3J小鼠,其他品系之间没有显著差异。四个爪EC95值分别为:C57Bl/6;22.8%,CD1;25.3%,129P3J;20.1%。129P3J小鼠的值显著低于CD1小鼠的值),而其他菌株之间没有显著差异。EC95仅在C57Bl/6小鼠的1-Paw和4-Paw方法之间存在显著差异。这些结果表明,在二氧化碳安乐死过程中,某些个体和某些小鼠品系可能会发生伤害和疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Pharmacokinetic and Efficacy Study of FDA-Indexed Pharmaceutical-Grade Extended-Release Buprenorphine and Compounded Sustained-Release Buprenorphine in African Green Monkeys (Chlorocebus aethiops). A Single-Operator Jugular Vein Sampling Method for Repeated Blood Collection in Conscious Rats. Cuprizone in Peanut Butter: An Alternative Method of Cuprizone Administration to Model Demyelination of the Central Nervous System. Pharmacokinetics and Paw Withdraw Pressure in Guinea Pigs (Cavia porcellus) Treated with Transdermal Buprenorphine. Analysis of Gross and Histopathologic Changes from Repeated Celiotomies in African Clawed Frogs (Xenopus laevis).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1