Exploring the Effectiveness of Group Cognitive Stimulation Training in People With Schizophrenia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Chia-Chi Chang, Hua-Shan Wu, Chen-Jee Hong, Chieh-Yu Liu, Chi-Wen Chen, Chiu-Yueh Yang
{"title":"Exploring the Effectiveness of Group Cognitive Stimulation Training in People With Schizophrenia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Chia-Chi Chang,&nbsp;Hua-Shan Wu,&nbsp;Chen-Jee Hong,&nbsp;Chieh-Yu Liu,&nbsp;Chi-Wen Chen,&nbsp;Chiu-Yueh Yang","doi":"10.1097/jnr.0000000000000576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Schizophrenia is a chronic degenerative brain disease. Cognitive impairment, the core symptom of this disease, affects the mood and social functioning of patients severely. Nonpharmacological therapies that both improve cognitive function and are suitable for patients with schizophrenia remain underdeveloped.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This article was designed to explore the effects of group cognitive stimulation training (GCST) on cognitive function and social function in people with schizophrenia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was conducted. The 76 participants were allocated into either the experimental or control group using blocked randomization. The participants were all patients with chronic schizophrenia recruited from seven rehabilitation units in northern Taiwan who were 20-65 years old and scored 10-25 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Taiwan Version. The experimental group received the 60-minute GCST twice a week for 7 weeks, whereas the control group received standard treatment. All outcome indicators were analyzed at baseline and after intervention using generalized estimating equations. The primary outcome indicators included cognitive function assessed using the Taiwan version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, working memory assessed using the Wechsler Memory Scale-Third Edition, and executive function assessed using the Taiwanese version of the Frontal Assessment Battery. The secondary outcome indicator was social function assessed using the Social Function Scale-Taiwan short version.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Generalized estimating equation modeling revealed the experimental group exhibited significant improvement in Montreal Cognitive Assessment total score ( B = 1.33, SE = 0.65, p = .040) and Social Function Scale-Taiwan short version ( B = 9.55, SE = 2.38, p < .001) after adjusting for nine covariates. No significant differences between the two groups in terms of working memory ( B = 4.79, SE = 2.66, p = .071) or executive function ( B = 0.53, SE = 0.63, p = .399) were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/implications for practice: </strong>The results indicate that GCST positively impacts overall cognitive and social functions but not higher-order cognitive function (working memory and executive function). In clinical settings, GCST may be applied to improve cognitive function in people with schizophrenia. The findings of this study may inform the practice of mental health nurses to improve cognitive function in patients in clinical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":94242,"journal":{"name":"The journal of nursing research : JNR","volume":"31 5","pages":"e291"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of nursing research : JNR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0000000000000576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Schizophrenia is a chronic degenerative brain disease. Cognitive impairment, the core symptom of this disease, affects the mood and social functioning of patients severely. Nonpharmacological therapies that both improve cognitive function and are suitable for patients with schizophrenia remain underdeveloped.

Purpose: This article was designed to explore the effects of group cognitive stimulation training (GCST) on cognitive function and social function in people with schizophrenia.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted. The 76 participants were allocated into either the experimental or control group using blocked randomization. The participants were all patients with chronic schizophrenia recruited from seven rehabilitation units in northern Taiwan who were 20-65 years old and scored 10-25 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Taiwan Version. The experimental group received the 60-minute GCST twice a week for 7 weeks, whereas the control group received standard treatment. All outcome indicators were analyzed at baseline and after intervention using generalized estimating equations. The primary outcome indicators included cognitive function assessed using the Taiwan version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, working memory assessed using the Wechsler Memory Scale-Third Edition, and executive function assessed using the Taiwanese version of the Frontal Assessment Battery. The secondary outcome indicator was social function assessed using the Social Function Scale-Taiwan short version.

Results: Generalized estimating equation modeling revealed the experimental group exhibited significant improvement in Montreal Cognitive Assessment total score ( B = 1.33, SE = 0.65, p = .040) and Social Function Scale-Taiwan short version ( B = 9.55, SE = 2.38, p < .001) after adjusting for nine covariates. No significant differences between the two groups in terms of working memory ( B = 4.79, SE = 2.66, p = .071) or executive function ( B = 0.53, SE = 0.63, p = .399) were found.

Conclusions/implications for practice: The results indicate that GCST positively impacts overall cognitive and social functions but not higher-order cognitive function (working memory and executive function). In clinical settings, GCST may be applied to improve cognitive function in people with schizophrenia. The findings of this study may inform the practice of mental health nurses to improve cognitive function in patients in clinical care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索群体认知刺激训练对精神分裂症患者的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
背景:精神分裂症是一种慢性退行性脑疾病。认知障碍是这种疾病的核心症状,严重影响患者的情绪和社会功能。既能改善认知功能又适合精神分裂症患者的非药物疗法仍不成熟。目的:探讨群体认知刺激训练(GCST)对精神分裂症患者认知功能和社会功能的影响。方法:采用随机对照试验。76名参与者被分为实验组或对照组,采用分组随机化。参与者均为台湾北部7家康复机构招募的慢性精神分裂症患者,年龄20-65岁,在蒙特利尔认知评估台湾版中得分10-25。实验组每周接受两次60分钟的GCST,持续7周,而对照组接受标准治疗。在基线和干预后使用广义估计方程对所有结果指标进行分析。主要结果指标包括使用台湾版蒙特利尔认知评估评估的认知功能,使用韦氏记忆量表第三版评估的工作记忆,以及使用台湾版正面评估电池评估的执行功能。次要的结果指标是使用社会功能量表-台湾简短版评估社会功能。结果:广义估计方程模型显示,在调整了9个协变量后,实验组在蒙特利尔认知评估总分(B=1.33,SE=0.65,p=.040)和社会功能量表-台湾简式(B=9.55,SE=2.38,p<.001)方面有显著改善。两组在工作记忆(B=4.79,SE=2.66,p=.071)或执行功能(B=0.53,SE=0.63,p=.399)方面没有发现显著差异。结论/对实践的启示:研究结果表明,GCST对整体认知和社会功能有积极影响,但对高级认知功能(工作记忆和执行功能)没有影响。在临床环境中,GCST可用于改善精神分裂症患者的认知功能。这项研究的结果可能为心理健康护士在临床护理中改善患者认知功能的实践提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Depression and Quality of Life in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Mediation Analysis of Handgrip Strength and Demoralization. Mediating Effects of Depressive Symptoms and Uncertainty on Physical Symptoms and Self-Care in Korean Older Men With Heart Failure. Effects of Procedural Information, Buzzy, and Multiple Interventions on Pain in Children Undergoing Venipuncture: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Effects of Resilience and Personal Accomplishment on the Relationship Between Quality of Work Life and Turnover Intention Among Newly Employed Nurses. Characteristics of Successful Leadership: Perspectives From Asian Nursing Leaders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1