Kelp forests collapse reduces understorey seaweed β-diversity.

IF 3.6 2区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES Annals of botany Pub Date : 2024-03-08 DOI:10.1093/aob/mcad154
Cristina Piñeiro-Corbeira, Sara Barrientos, Isabella Provera, Manuel E García, Pilar Díaz-Tapia, Viviana Peña, Ignacio Bárbara, Rodolfo Barreiro
{"title":"Kelp forests collapse reduces understorey seaweed β-diversity.","authors":"Cristina Piñeiro-Corbeira, Sara Barrientos, Isabella Provera, Manuel E García, Pilar Díaz-Tapia, Viviana Peña, Ignacio Bárbara, Rodolfo Barreiro","doi":"10.1093/aob/mcad154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Kelps are the primary foundation species in temperate subtidal rocky shores worldwide. However, global change is causing their decline with consequences for the organisms that rely on them. An accurate assessment of these consequences may depend on which attributes of the associated community are considered. This study shows that conventional α-diversity approaches may overlook some of these consequences compared to spatially explicit approaches such as with β-diversity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 1-year seasonal study was conducted to compare the macroalgal understorey between healthy reefs with a Laminaria ochroleuca canopy and degraded reefs where the canopy collapsed years ago due to excessive fish herbivory. At each reef, the understorey seaweed assemblage was recorded in five replicate quadrats to estimate α-diversity (total richness, species density, Shannon index) and β-diversity (intra- and inter-reef scale).</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>The understorey assemblage exhibited a distinct seasonal dynamic in both healthy and degraded reefs. α-Diversity attributes increased in spring and summer; turf-forming algae were particularly dominant in degraded reefs during summer. β-Diversity also showed seasonal variability, but mostly due to the changes in degraded reefs. None of the α-diversity estimates differed significantly between healthy and degraded reefs. In contrast, spatial β-diversity was significantly lower in degraded reefs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the loss of the kelp canopy affected the composition of the macroalgal understorey, none of the conventional indicators of α-diversity detected significant differences between healthy and degraded reefs. In contrast, small-scale spatial β-diversity decreased significantly as a result of deforestation, suggesting that the loss of kelp canopy may not significantly affect the number of species but still have an effect on their spatial arrangement. Our results suggest that small-scale β-diversity may be a good proxy for a more comprehensive assessment of the consequences of kelp forest decline.</p>","PeriodicalId":8023,"journal":{"name":"Annals of botany","volume":" ","pages":"93-104"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10921829/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcad154","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Kelps are the primary foundation species in temperate subtidal rocky shores worldwide. However, global change is causing their decline with consequences for the organisms that rely on them. An accurate assessment of these consequences may depend on which attributes of the associated community are considered. This study shows that conventional α-diversity approaches may overlook some of these consequences compared to spatially explicit approaches such as with β-diversity.

Methods: A 1-year seasonal study was conducted to compare the macroalgal understorey between healthy reefs with a Laminaria ochroleuca canopy and degraded reefs where the canopy collapsed years ago due to excessive fish herbivory. At each reef, the understorey seaweed assemblage was recorded in five replicate quadrats to estimate α-diversity (total richness, species density, Shannon index) and β-diversity (intra- and inter-reef scale).

Key results: The understorey assemblage exhibited a distinct seasonal dynamic in both healthy and degraded reefs. α-Diversity attributes increased in spring and summer; turf-forming algae were particularly dominant in degraded reefs during summer. β-Diversity also showed seasonal variability, but mostly due to the changes in degraded reefs. None of the α-diversity estimates differed significantly between healthy and degraded reefs. In contrast, spatial β-diversity was significantly lower in degraded reefs.

Conclusions: Although the loss of the kelp canopy affected the composition of the macroalgal understorey, none of the conventional indicators of α-diversity detected significant differences between healthy and degraded reefs. In contrast, small-scale spatial β-diversity decreased significantly as a result of deforestation, suggesting that the loss of kelp canopy may not significantly affect the number of species but still have an effect on their spatial arrangement. Our results suggest that small-scale β-diversity may be a good proxy for a more comprehensive assessment of the consequences of kelp forest decline.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
海带林的崩塌降低了林下海藻的β-多样性。
背景和目的:海带是世界温带潮下岩石海岸的主要基础物种。然而,全球变化正在导致它们的衰退,并对依赖它们的生物产生影响。对这些后果的准确评估可能取决于相关社区的哪些属性被考虑在内。这项研究表明,与β-多样性等空间显式方法相比,传统的α-多样性方法可能会忽略其中的一些后果。方法:进行了一项为期一年的季节性研究,比较了健康珊瑚礁和退化珊瑚礁之间的大型藻类下层,前者具有Laminaria chroleuca冠层,后者多年前由于过度的鱼类草食性而导致冠层坍塌。在每个珊瑚礁,林下海藻组合被记录在五个重复的象限中,以估计α(总丰富度、物种密度、香农指数)和β-多样性(珊瑚礁内和珊瑚礁间尺度)。关键结果:在健康和退化的珊瑚礁中,林下群落都表现出明显的季节动态。α-多样性属性在春季和夏季增加;在夏季退化的珊瑚礁中,草皮形成藻类尤其占主导地位。β多样性也表现出季节性变化,但主要是由于退化珊瑚礁的变化。健康珊瑚礁和退化珊瑚礁之间的α-多样性估计值没有显著差异。相比之下,退化珊瑚礁的空间β多样性明显较低。结论:尽管海带冠层的损失影响了大型藻类下层的组成,但没有一种传统的α-多样性指标检测到健康珊瑚礁和退化珊瑚礁之间的显著差异。相比之下,由于森林砍伐,小规模的空间β-多样性显著下降,这表明海带冠层的损失可能不会对物种数量产生显著影响,但仍会对其空间排列产生影响。我们的研究结果表明,小规模的β-多样性可能是对海带林衰退后果进行更全面评估的一个很好的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of botany
Annals of botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
138
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Botany is an international plant science journal publishing novel and rigorous research in all areas of plant science. It is published monthly in both electronic and printed forms with at least two extra issues each year that focus on a particular theme in plant biology. The Journal is managed by the Annals of Botany Company, a not-for-profit educational charity established to promote plant science worldwide. The Journal publishes original research papers, invited and submitted review articles, ''Research in Context'' expanding on original work, ''Botanical Briefings'' as short overviews of important topics, and ''Viewpoints'' giving opinions. All papers in each issue are summarized briefly in Content Snapshots , there are topical news items in the Plant Cuttings section and Book Reviews . A rigorous review process ensures that readers are exposed to genuine and novel advances across a wide spectrum of botanical knowledge. All papers aim to advance knowledge and make a difference to our understanding of plant science.
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Centromere drive may propel the evolution of chromosome and genome size in plants. Orchid phylogenetics and evolution: history, current status and prospects. Transcriptome sequencing data provide a solid base to understand the phylogenetic relationships, biogeography and reticulated evolution of the genus Zamia L. (Cycadales: Zamiaceae). The seed morphospace, a new contribution towards the multidimensional study of angiosperm sexual reproductive biology. The curious case of selenium hyperaccumulation in Coelospermum decipiens from the Cape York Peninsula (Queensland, Australia).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1