The prognostic impact of KRAS, TP53, STK11 and KEAP1 mutations and their influence on the NLR in NSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy

Francis Proulx-Rocray , Bertrand Routy , Rami Nassabein , Wiam Belkaid , Danh Tran-Thanh , Julie Malo , Marion Tonneau , Omar El Ouarzadi , Marie Florescu , Mustapha Tehfe , Normand Blais
{"title":"The prognostic impact of KRAS, TP53, STK11 and KEAP1 mutations and their influence on the NLR in NSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy","authors":"Francis Proulx-Rocray ,&nbsp;Bertrand Routy ,&nbsp;Rami Nassabein ,&nbsp;Wiam Belkaid ,&nbsp;Danh Tran-Thanh ,&nbsp;Julie Malo ,&nbsp;Marion Tonneau ,&nbsp;Omar El Ouarzadi ,&nbsp;Marie Florescu ,&nbsp;Mustapha Tehfe ,&nbsp;Normand Blais","doi":"10.1016/j.ctarc.2023.100767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>PD-L1 expression is used to predict NSCLC response to ICIs, but its performance is suboptimal. The impact of <em>KRAS</em> mutations in these patients is unclear. Studies evaluating co-mutations in <em>TP53, STK11</em> and <em>KEAP1</em> as well as the NLR showed that they may predict the benefit of ICIs.</p></div><div><h3>Patients &amp; methods</h3><p>This is a retrospective study of patients with NSCLC treated with ICIs at the CHUM between July 2015 and June 2020. OS and PFS were compared using Kaplan-Meier and logrank methods. Co-mutations in <em>TP53, STK11</em> and <em>KEAP1</em> as well as the NLR were accounted for. ORR and safety were compared using Wald method.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From 100 patients with known <em>KRAS</em> status, 50 were mutated (<em>KRAS</em><sup>Mut</sup>). Mutation in <em>TP53, STK11</em> and <em>KEAP1</em> were present, and their status known in, respectively, 19/40 (47.5 %), 8/39 (20.5 %) and 4/38 (10.5 %) patients. <em>STK11</em><sup>Mut</sup> and <em>KEAP1</em><sup>Mut</sup> were associated with shorter overall survival when compared with wild type tumors (respectively median OS of 3.3 <em>vs</em> 20.4, <em>p</em> = 0.0001 and 10.1 <em>vs</em> 17.7, <em>p</em> = 0.24). When <em>KRAS</em> status was compounded with <em>STK11</em>/<em>KEAP1, KRAS</em><sup>Mut</sup> trended to a better prognosis in <em>STK11+KEAP1</em><sup>WT</sup> tumors (median OS 21.1 <em>vs</em> 15.8 for <em>KRAS</em><sup>WT</sup>, <em>p</em> = 0.15), but not for <em>STK11+/-KEAP1</em><sup>Mut</sup> tumors. The NLR was strongly impacted by <em>STK11</em> (6.0<sup>Mut</sup> <em>vs</em> 3.6<sup>WT</sup>, <em>p</em> = 0.014) and <em>TP53</em> (3.2<sup>Mut</sup> <em>vs</em> 4.8<sup>WT</sup>, <em>p</em> = 0.048), but not by <em>KEAP1</em> or <em>KRAS</em> mutations.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p><em>STK11</em><sup>Mut</sup> and <em>KEAP1</em><sup>Mut</sup> are adverse predictors of ICI therapy benefit. The NLR is strongly impacted by <em>STK11</em><sup>Mut</sup> but not by <em>KEAP1</em><sup>Mut</sup>, suggesting differences in their resistance mechanism. In <em>STK11-KEAP1</em><sup>WT</sup> tumors, <em>KRA</em>S<sup>Mut</sup> seem associated with improved survival in NSCLC patients treated with ICIs.</p></div><div><h3>MicroAbstract</h3><p>Response of NSCLC to immunotherapy is not easily predictable. We conducted a retrospective study in 100 patients with NSCLC and a known <em>KRAS</em> status. By accounting for different co-mutations, <em>KRAS</em> mutation was found to be associated with a better median overall survival in <em>STK11</em> and <em>KEAP1</em> wild-type tumors (21.1 <em>vs</em> 15.8, <em>p</em> = 0.15). NLR was impacted by <em>STK11</em>, but not <em>KEAP1</em> mutation, suggesting a difference in their resistance mechanism.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9507,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment and research communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment and research communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468294223000898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

PD-L1 expression is used to predict NSCLC response to ICIs, but its performance is suboptimal. The impact of KRAS mutations in these patients is unclear. Studies evaluating co-mutations in TP53, STK11 and KEAP1 as well as the NLR showed that they may predict the benefit of ICIs.

Patients & methods

This is a retrospective study of patients with NSCLC treated with ICIs at the CHUM between July 2015 and June 2020. OS and PFS were compared using Kaplan-Meier and logrank methods. Co-mutations in TP53, STK11 and KEAP1 as well as the NLR were accounted for. ORR and safety were compared using Wald method.

Results

From 100 patients with known KRAS status, 50 were mutated (KRASMut). Mutation in TP53, STK11 and KEAP1 were present, and their status known in, respectively, 19/40 (47.5 %), 8/39 (20.5 %) and 4/38 (10.5 %) patients. STK11Mut and KEAP1Mut were associated with shorter overall survival when compared with wild type tumors (respectively median OS of 3.3 vs 20.4, p = 0.0001 and 10.1 vs 17.7, p = 0.24). When KRAS status was compounded with STK11/KEAP1, KRASMut trended to a better prognosis in STK11+KEAP1WT tumors (median OS 21.1 vs 15.8 for KRASWT, p = 0.15), but not for STK11+/-KEAP1Mut tumors. The NLR was strongly impacted by STK11 (6.0Mut vs 3.6WT, p = 0.014) and TP53 (3.2Mut vs 4.8WT, p = 0.048), but not by KEAP1 or KRAS mutations.

Conclusion

STK11Mut and KEAP1Mut are adverse predictors of ICI therapy benefit. The NLR is strongly impacted by STK11Mut but not by KEAP1Mut, suggesting differences in their resistance mechanism. In STK11-KEAP1WT tumors, KRASMut seem associated with improved survival in NSCLC patients treated with ICIs.

MicroAbstract

Response of NSCLC to immunotherapy is not easily predictable. We conducted a retrospective study in 100 patients with NSCLC and a known KRAS status. By accounting for different co-mutations, KRAS mutation was found to be associated with a better median overall survival in STK11 and KEAP1 wild-type tumors (21.1 vs 15.8, p = 0.15). NLR was impacted by STK11, but not KEAP1 mutation, suggesting a difference in their resistance mechanism.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
KRAS、TP53、STK11和KEAP1突变对接受免疫治疗的NSCLC患者预后的影响及其对NLR的影响。
背景:PD-L1的表达用于预测NSCLC对ICIs的反应,但其性能并不理想。KRAS突变对这些患者的影响尚不清楚。评估TP53、STK11和KEAP1以及NLR的共突变的研究表明,它们可以预测ICIs的益处。患者和方法:这是一项对2015年7月至2020年6月在CHUM接受ICIs治疗的NSCLC患者的回顾性研究。使用Kaplan-Meier和logrank方法比较OS和PFS。说明了TP53、STK11和KEAP1以及NLR的共突变。用Wald法比较ORR和安全性。结果:在100例已知KRAS状态的患者中,有50例发生了突变(KRASMut)。TP53、STK11和KEAP1存在突变,其状态分别在19/40(47.5%)、8/39(20.5%)和4/38(10.5%)患者中已知。与野生型肿瘤相比,STK11Mut和KEAP1Mut的总生存期较短(中位OS分别为3.3 vs 20.4,p=0.001和10.1 vs 17.7,p=0.024)。当KRAS状态与STK11/KEAP1相结合时,KRASMut在STK11+KEAP1WT肿瘤中的预后更好(KRASWT的中位OS 21.1 vs 15.8,p=0.015),但在STK11+/-KEAP1Mout肿瘤中则不然。NLR受到STK11(6.0Mut对3.6WT,p=0.014)和TP53(3.2Mut对4.8WT,p=0.048)的强烈影响,但不受KEAP1或KRAS突变的影响。结论:STK11Mut和KEAP1Mut是ICI治疗获益的不良预测因素。NLR受到STK11Mut的强烈影响,但不受KEAP1Mut的影响,这表明它们的抗性机制存在差异。在STK11-KEAP1WT肿瘤中,KRASMut似乎与ICIs治疗的NSCLC患者的生存率提高有关。微观结论:NSCLC对免疫疗法的反应不容易预测。我们对100名非小细胞肺癌和已知KRAS状态的患者进行了回顾性研究。通过考虑不同的共突变,KRAS突变被发现与STK11和KEAP1野生型肿瘤更好的中位总生存率相关(21.1比15.8,p=0.15)。NLR受到STK11的影响,但没有受到KEAP1突变的影响,这表明它们的抗性机制存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
148
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Cancer Treatment and Research Communications is an international peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing comprehensive basic, translational, and clinical oncology research. The journal is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, policy, and treatment of cancer and provides a global forum for the nurturing and development of future generations of oncology scientists. Cancer Treatment and Research Communications publishes comprehensive reviews and original studies describing various aspects of basic through clinical research of all tumor types. The journal also accepts clinical studies in oncology, with an emphasis on prospective early phase clinical trials. Specific areas of interest include basic, translational, and clinical research and mechanistic approaches; cancer biology; molecular carcinogenesis; genetics and genomics; stem cell and developmental biology; immunology; molecular and cellular oncology; systems biology; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; cancer policy; and integration of various approaches. Our mission is to be the premier source of relevant information through promoting excellence in research and facilitating the timely translation of that science to health care and clinical practice.
期刊最新文献
Clinical and pathological differences between early- and late-onset colorectal cancer and determinants of one-year all-cause mortality among advanced-stage patients: a retrospective cohort study in Medellín, Colombia A case of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pregnancy with cervical cancer (IB3) Pregnancy-related breast cancer: 14-year experience in a tertiary institution in Hong Kong Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) clone 22C3 expression in resected colorectal cancer as companion diagnostics for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: A comparison study and inter-rater agreement evaluation across proposed cut-offs and predictive (TPS, CPS and IC) scores Tumor circulating biomarkers in colorectal cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1