Žiga Bizjak, June Ho Choi, Wonhyoung Park, Franjo Pernuš, Žiga Špiclin
{"title":"Deep geometric learning for intracranial aneurysm detection: towards expert rater performance.","authors":"Žiga Bizjak, June Ho Choi, Wonhyoung Park, Franjo Pernuš, Žiga Špiclin","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2023-020905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early detection of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) is crucial for patient outcomes. Typically identified on angiographic scans such as CT angiography (CTA) or MR angiography (MRA), the sensitivity of experts in studies on small IAs (diameter <3 mm) was moderate (64-74.1% for CTAs and 70-92.8% for MRAs), and these figures could be lower in a routine clinical setting. Recent research shows that the expert level of sensitivity might be achieved using deep learning approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A large multisite dataset including 1054 MRA and 2174 CTA scans with expert IA annotations was collected. A novel modality-agnostic two-step IA detection approach was proposed. The first step used nnU-Net for segmenting vascular structures, with model training performed separately for each modality. In the second step, segmentations were converted to vascular surface that was parcellated by sampling point clouds and, using a PointNet++ model, each point was labeled as an aneurysm or vessel class.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quantitative validation of the test data from different sites than the training data showed that the proposed approach achieved pooled sensitivity of 85% and 90% on 157 MRA scans and 1338 CTA scans, respectively, while the sensitivity for small IAs was 72% and 83%, respectively. The corresponding number of false findings per image was low at 1.54 and 1.57, and 0.4 and 0.83 on healthy subject data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed approach achieved a state-of-the-art balance between the sensitivity and the number of false findings, matched the expert-level sensitivity to small (and other) IAs on external data, and therefore seems fit for computer-assisted detection of IAs in a clinical setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1157-1162"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2023-020905","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Early detection of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) is crucial for patient outcomes. Typically identified on angiographic scans such as CT angiography (CTA) or MR angiography (MRA), the sensitivity of experts in studies on small IAs (diameter <3 mm) was moderate (64-74.1% for CTAs and 70-92.8% for MRAs), and these figures could be lower in a routine clinical setting. Recent research shows that the expert level of sensitivity might be achieved using deep learning approaches.
Methods: A large multisite dataset including 1054 MRA and 2174 CTA scans with expert IA annotations was collected. A novel modality-agnostic two-step IA detection approach was proposed. The first step used nnU-Net for segmenting vascular structures, with model training performed separately for each modality. In the second step, segmentations were converted to vascular surface that was parcellated by sampling point clouds and, using a PointNet++ model, each point was labeled as an aneurysm or vessel class.
Results: Quantitative validation of the test data from different sites than the training data showed that the proposed approach achieved pooled sensitivity of 85% and 90% on 157 MRA scans and 1338 CTA scans, respectively, while the sensitivity for small IAs was 72% and 83%, respectively. The corresponding number of false findings per image was low at 1.54 and 1.57, and 0.4 and 0.83 on healthy subject data.
Conclusions: The proposed approach achieved a state-of-the-art balance between the sensitivity and the number of false findings, matched the expert-level sensitivity to small (and other) IAs on external data, and therefore seems fit for computer-assisted detection of IAs in a clinical setting.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.