A view from the top: A qualitative exploration of top-level health care leaders’ perceptions on the implementation of simulation-based education in postgraduate medical education

IF 4.9 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Medical Education Pub Date : 2023-10-13 DOI:10.1111/medu.15248
Leizl Joy Nayahangan, Ebbe Thinggaard, Farsana Khan, Amandus Gustafsson, Anne Mette Mørcke, Adam Dubrowski, Laura E. Hirshfield, Lars Konge
{"title":"A view from the top: A qualitative exploration of top-level health care leaders’ perceptions on the implementation of simulation-based education in postgraduate medical education","authors":"Leizl Joy Nayahangan,&nbsp;Ebbe Thinggaard,&nbsp;Farsana Khan,&nbsp;Amandus Gustafsson,&nbsp;Anne Mette Mørcke,&nbsp;Adam Dubrowski,&nbsp;Laura E. Hirshfield,&nbsp;Lars Konge","doi":"10.1111/medu.15248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Although there is substantial evidence supporting the benefits of simulation-based education (SBE), its widespread and effective implementation remains challenging. The aim of this study was to explore the perceptions of top-level health care leaders regarding SBE and the barriers and facilitators that influence its wide implementation as part of the postgraduate surgical curricula in Denmark.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted semi-structured interviews with top-level health care leaders who were chosen based on their roles in ensuring high-quality patient care delivery and developing strategies to achieve the goals of the entire health care system. The interview transcripts were translated into English, and a thematic approach was used to code and inductively analyse the data. We used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to identify and understand the determinants to a successful implementation of SBE.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We interviewed 13 participants from different political and administrative levels. We found that the participants had limited knowledge about SBE, which highlighted a disconnection between these leaders and the educational environment. This was further compounded by a lack of effective communication and inadequate information dissemination between simulation centres and higher-level organisations. While participants recognised the benefits of SBE for doctors in training, they expressed concerns about the implementation given the already strained health care system and limited resources. The need for evidence, particularly in the context of patient safety, was emphasised to facilitate SBE implementation. Although participants supported the implementation of SBE, it was unclear who should initiate action.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>This study highlighted the perspectives of top-level health care leaders regarding SBE and identified the determinant factors for a successful implementation. Effective communication channels are crucial to enhance collaborations and reduce the disconnection between the different health care organisational levels. Strategic implementation processes, including the roles and responsibilities, should be defined and established. These will inform decisions regarding the implementation strategies to effectively integrate SBE into the residency training curricula.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":"58 4","pages":"415-429"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/medu.15248","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Although there is substantial evidence supporting the benefits of simulation-based education (SBE), its widespread and effective implementation remains challenging. The aim of this study was to explore the perceptions of top-level health care leaders regarding SBE and the barriers and facilitators that influence its wide implementation as part of the postgraduate surgical curricula in Denmark.

Methods

We conducted semi-structured interviews with top-level health care leaders who were chosen based on their roles in ensuring high-quality patient care delivery and developing strategies to achieve the goals of the entire health care system. The interview transcripts were translated into English, and a thematic approach was used to code and inductively analyse the data. We used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to identify and understand the determinants to a successful implementation of SBE.

Results

We interviewed 13 participants from different political and administrative levels. We found that the participants had limited knowledge about SBE, which highlighted a disconnection between these leaders and the educational environment. This was further compounded by a lack of effective communication and inadequate information dissemination between simulation centres and higher-level organisations. While participants recognised the benefits of SBE for doctors in training, they expressed concerns about the implementation given the already strained health care system and limited resources. The need for evidence, particularly in the context of patient safety, was emphasised to facilitate SBE implementation. Although participants supported the implementation of SBE, it was unclear who should initiate action.

Discussion

This study highlighted the perspectives of top-level health care leaders regarding SBE and identified the determinant factors for a successful implementation. Effective communication channels are crucial to enhance collaborations and reduce the disconnection between the different health care organisational levels. Strategic implementation processes, including the roles and responsibilities, should be defined and established. These will inform decisions regarding the implementation strategies to effectively integrate SBE into the residency training curricula.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自上而下的观点:对顶级医疗保健领导者对在研究生医学教育中实施模拟教育的看法进行定性探索。
引言:尽管有大量证据支持基于模拟的教育(SBE)的好处,但其广泛有效的实施仍然具有挑战性。本研究的目的是探讨顶级医疗保健领导者对SBE的看法,以及影响SBE作为丹麦外科研究生课程一部分广泛实施的障碍和促进者以及制定战略以实现整个医疗保健系统的目标。访谈记录被翻译成英文,并采用专题方法对数据进行编码和归纳分析。我们使用实施研究综合框架来确定和理解SBE成功实施的决定因素。结果:我们采访了来自不同政治和行政级别的13名参与者。我们发现,参与者对SBE的了解有限,这突出了这些领导者与教育环境之间的脱节。模拟中心和上级组织之间缺乏有效沟通和信息传播不足,进一步加剧了这种情况。虽然参与者认识到SBE对医生培训的好处,但考虑到已经紧张的医疗保健系统和有限的资源,他们对实施SBE表示担忧。强调了证据的必要性,特别是在患者安全的背景下,以促进SBE的实施。尽管与会者支持实施SBE,但尚不清楚谁应该采取行动。讨论:本研究强调了顶级医疗保健领导者对SBE的看法,并确定了成功实施的决定因素。有效的沟通渠道对于加强合作和减少不同医疗保健组织层面之间的脱节至关重要。应界定和确立战略执行进程,包括作用和责任。这些将为有关实施战略的决策提供信息,以有效地将SBE纳入住院培训课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Education
Medical Education 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
279
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education seeks to be the pre-eminent journal in the field of education for health care professionals, and publishes material of the highest quality, reflecting world wide or provocative issues and perspectives. The journal welcomes high quality papers on all aspects of health professional education including; -undergraduate education -postgraduate training -continuing professional development -interprofessional education
期刊最新文献
The need for critical and intersectional approaches to equity efforts in postgraduate medical education: A critical narrative review. When I say … neurodiversity paradigm. The transition to clerkshIps bootcamp: Innovative and flexible curriculum strategies post COVID-19 adaptation. Issue Information Empowering dental students' collaborative learning using peer assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1