Parafoveal chondral lesion of the femoral head in patients with femoroacetabular impingement.

Q3 Medicine Radiologia Brasileira Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1590/0100-3984.2023.0019
Guilherme Pradi Adam, Igor Varela Meyer, Tainá de Arruda E Silva, Mark Wanderley, Eduardo Bristot de Mello, Leonardo Valentim, Israel Silva Maia, Mariela Goulart Adames
{"title":"Parafoveal chondral lesion of the femoral head in patients with femoroacetabular impingement.","authors":"Guilherme Pradi Adam,&nbsp;Igor Varela Meyer,&nbsp;Tainá de Arruda E Silva,&nbsp;Mark Wanderley,&nbsp;Eduardo Bristot de Mello,&nbsp;Leonardo Valentim,&nbsp;Israel Silva Maia,&nbsp;Mariela Goulart Adames","doi":"10.1590/0100-3984.2023.0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe cases of parafoveal chondral lesion of the femoral head in patients with femoroacetabular impingement, correlating the clinical and imaging data.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective descriptive case series of parafoveal chondral lesion of the femoral head in 21 patients who underwent computed tomography and magnetic resonance arthrography scans of the hip, having then received an imaging-based diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 21 patients evaluated, 15 (71%) had cam-type femoroacetabular impingement, whereas five (24%) had mixed-type impingement, and one (5%) had pincer-type impingement. Twelve patients (57%) had a low frequency of physical activity, which was significantly associated with the presence of cam-type impingement (<i>p</i> = 0.015). Although the extent of the lesion correlated significantly with the acetabular coverage angle (<i>p</i> = 0.04), it did not correlate significantly with the alpha angle or femoral head-neck offset value (<i>p</i> = 0.08 and <i>p</i> = 0.06, respectively). We also found no correlation between the extent of the lesion and the other main parameters that define the femoroacetabular impingement types.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This was one of the largest case series of parafoveal chondral lesion of the femoral head in patients with imaging findings of femoroacetabular impingement. The extent of such lesions does not appear to correlate with the parameters of femoroacetabular impingement, with the exception of the acetabular coverage angle.</p>","PeriodicalId":20842,"journal":{"name":"Radiologia Brasileira","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10567093/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologia Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2023.0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe cases of parafoveal chondral lesion of the femoral head in patients with femoroacetabular impingement, correlating the clinical and imaging data.

Materials and methods: This was a retrospective descriptive case series of parafoveal chondral lesion of the femoral head in 21 patients who underwent computed tomography and magnetic resonance arthrography scans of the hip, having then received an imaging-based diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement.

Results: Of the 21 patients evaluated, 15 (71%) had cam-type femoroacetabular impingement, whereas five (24%) had mixed-type impingement, and one (5%) had pincer-type impingement. Twelve patients (57%) had a low frequency of physical activity, which was significantly associated with the presence of cam-type impingement (p = 0.015). Although the extent of the lesion correlated significantly with the acetabular coverage angle (p = 0.04), it did not correlate significantly with the alpha angle or femoral head-neck offset value (p = 0.08 and p = 0.06, respectively). We also found no correlation between the extent of the lesion and the other main parameters that define the femoroacetabular impingement types.

Conclusion: This was one of the largest case series of parafoveal chondral lesion of the femoral head in patients with imaging findings of femoroacetabular impingement. The extent of such lesions does not appear to correlate with the parameters of femoroacetabular impingement, with the exception of the acetabular coverage angle.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
股骨髋臼撞击患者股骨头中央凹旁软骨损伤。
目的:描述股骨髋臼撞击患者股骨头旁软骨损伤的病例,并与临床和影像学数据进行对比。材料和方法:这是一个回顾性描述性病例系列,涉及21名患者,他们接受了髋关节计算机断层扫描和磁共振关节造影扫描,然后接受了基于影像学的股骨髋臼撞击诊断。结果:在评估的21例患者中,15例(71%)发生凸轮型股骨髋臼撞击,5例(24%)发生混合型撞击,1例(5%)发生钳形撞击。12名患者(57%)的体力活动频率较低,这与凸轮型撞击的存在显著相关(p=0.015)。尽管病变程度与髋臼覆盖角显著相关(p=0.04),但与α角或股骨头颈偏移值无显著相关性(分别为p=0.08和p=0.06)。我们还发现病变程度与定义股骨髋臼撞击类型的其他主要参数之间没有相关性。结论:在股骨髋臼撞击的影像学表现中,这是最大的股骨头窝旁软骨损伤病例系列之一。除髋臼覆盖角外,此类病变的程度似乎与股骨髋臼撞击的参数无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiologia Brasileira
Radiologia Brasileira Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
Experience in other segments should shorten studies using Look-Locker and high-resolution T2 images in the study of focal lung lesions. Look-Locker T1 relaxometry and high-resolution T2 in the evaluation of lung lesions: a single-center prospective study. Rectal cancer management: the essential role of magnetic resonance imaging in neoadjuvant therapy. The importance of PSMA PET/CT in evaluating biochemical recurrence in patients with prostate cancer and the need to expand access to this examination via public health care systems. Evaluation of glial tumors: correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and histopathological analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1