Choosing Wisely and Promoting High-Value Care and Staff Safety During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Large Safety Net System.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Quality Management in Health Care Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-11 DOI:10.1097/QMH.0000000000000431
Mona Krouss, Sigal Israilov, Nessreen Mestari, Joseph Talledo, Daniel Alaiev, Joshua B Moskovitz, Robert T Faillace, Amit Uppal, Ian Fagan, Joan Curcio, Jinel Scott, Michael Bouton, Kenra Ford, Victor Cohen, Eric K Wei, Hyung J Cho
{"title":"Choosing Wisely and Promoting High-Value Care and Staff Safety During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Large Safety Net System.","authors":"Mona Krouss, Sigal Israilov, Nessreen Mestari, Joseph Talledo, Daniel Alaiev, Joshua B Moskovitz, Robert T Faillace, Amit Uppal, Ian Fagan, Joan Curcio, Jinel Scott, Michael Bouton, Kenra Ford, Victor Cohen, Eric K Wei, Hyung J Cho","doi":"10.1097/QMH.0000000000000431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>As the COVID-19 pandemic brought surges of hospitalized patients, it was important to focus on reducing overuse of tests and procedures to not only reduce potential harm to patients but also reduce unnecessary exposure to staff. The objective of this study was to create a Choosing Wisely in COVID-19 list to guide clinicians in practicing high-value care at our health system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Choosing Wisely in COVID-19 list was developed in October 2020 by an interdisciplinary High Value Care Council at New York City Health + Hospitals, the largest public health system in the United States. The first phase involved gathering areas of overuse from interdisciplinary staff across the system. The second phase used a modified Delphi scoring process asking participants to rate recommendations on a 5-point Likert scale based on criteria of degree of evidence, potential to prevent patient harm, and potential to prevent staff harm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The top 5 recommendations included avoiding tracheal intubation without trial of noninvasive ventilation (4.4); not placing routine central venous catheters (4.33); avoiding routine daily laboratory tests and batching laboratory draws (4.19); not ordering daily chest radiographs (4.17); and not using bronchodilators in the absence of reactive airway disease (4.13).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We successfully developed Choosing Wisely in COVID-19 recommendations that focus on evidence and preventing patient and staff harm in a large safety net system to reduce overuse.</p>","PeriodicalId":20986,"journal":{"name":"Quality Management in Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality Management in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000431","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: As the COVID-19 pandemic brought surges of hospitalized patients, it was important to focus on reducing overuse of tests and procedures to not only reduce potential harm to patients but also reduce unnecessary exposure to staff. The objective of this study was to create a Choosing Wisely in COVID-19 list to guide clinicians in practicing high-value care at our health system.

Methods: A Choosing Wisely in COVID-19 list was developed in October 2020 by an interdisciplinary High Value Care Council at New York City Health + Hospitals, the largest public health system in the United States. The first phase involved gathering areas of overuse from interdisciplinary staff across the system. The second phase used a modified Delphi scoring process asking participants to rate recommendations on a 5-point Likert scale based on criteria of degree of evidence, potential to prevent patient harm, and potential to prevent staff harm.

Results: The top 5 recommendations included avoiding tracheal intubation without trial of noninvasive ventilation (4.4); not placing routine central venous catheters (4.33); avoiding routine daily laboratory tests and batching laboratory draws (4.19); not ordering daily chest radiographs (4.17); and not using bronchodilators in the absence of reactive airway disease (4.13).

Conclusion: We successfully developed Choosing Wisely in COVID-19 recommendations that focus on evidence and preventing patient and staff harm in a large safety net system to reduce overuse.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在新冠肺炎大流行期间,在大型安全网系统中明智选择并促进高价值护理和员工安全。
背景和目标:由于新冠肺炎大流行导致住院患者激增,重要的是要重点减少过度使用检测和程序,不仅要减少对患者的潜在伤害,还要减少对工作人员的不必要接触。本研究的目的是创建一份新冠肺炎选择明智名单,以指导临床医生在我们的卫生系统中实施高价值护理。方法:美国最大的公共卫生系统纽约市卫生+医院的跨学科高价值护理委员会于2020年10月制定了新冠肺炎患者明智选择名单。第一阶段涉及从整个系统的跨学科工作人员那里收集过度使用的领域。第二阶段使用了一个改进的德尔菲评分过程,要求参与者根据证据程度、预防患者伤害的潜力和预防员工伤害的潜力等标准,在5分的Likert量表上对建议进行评分。结果:前5项建议包括在未进行无创通气试验的情况下避免气管插管(4.4);未放置常规中心静脉导管(4.33);避免日常实验室测试和分批实验室绘图(4.19);未订购每日胸部X光片(4.17);以及在没有反应性气道疾病的情况下不使用支气管扩张剂(4.13)。结论:我们成功地制定了新冠肺炎建议中的明智选择,该建议侧重于证据,并在大型安全网系统中预防患者和工作人员的伤害,以减少过度使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Quality Management in Health Care
Quality Management in Health Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
108
期刊介绍: Quality Management in Health Care (QMHC) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for our readers to explore the theoretical, technical, and strategic elements of health care quality management. The journal''s primary focus is on organizational structure and processes as these affect the quality of care and patient outcomes. In particular, it: -Builds knowledge about the application of statistical tools, control charts, benchmarking, and other devices used in the ongoing monitoring and evaluation of care and of patient outcomes; -Encourages research in and evaluation of the results of various organizational strategies designed to bring about quantifiable improvements in patient outcomes; -Fosters the application of quality management science to patient care processes and clinical decision-making; -Fosters cooperation and communication among health care providers, payers and regulators in their efforts to improve the quality of patient outcomes; -Explores links among the various clinical, technical, administrative, and managerial disciplines involved in patient care, as well as the role and responsibilities of organizational governance in ongoing quality management.
期刊最新文献
Improving Linkages Between Sexual and Reproductive Health and Substance Use Providers: The Partnership to Advance Integrated Referrals. The Human-Technology Continuum. Information Overload-Do We Read All the Posters Displayed Across the Walls on Hospital Wards? Leadership Strategies to Increase Psychological Safety of Nurses: A Longitudinal Study. Patient-Engagement Health Information Technology and Quality Process Outcomes in Federally Qualified Health Centers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1