Exploring genetic influences on adverse outcome pathways using heuristic simulation and graph data science

IF 3.1 Q2 TOXICOLOGY Computational Toxicology Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.comtox.2023.100261
Joseph D. Romano , Liang Mei , Jonathan Senn , Jason H. Moore , Holly M. Mortensen
{"title":"Exploring genetic influences on adverse outcome pathways using heuristic simulation and graph data science","authors":"Joseph D. Romano ,&nbsp;Liang Mei ,&nbsp;Jonathan Senn ,&nbsp;Jason H. Moore ,&nbsp;Holly M. Mortensen","doi":"10.1016/j.comtox.2023.100261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Adverse outcome pathways provide a powerful tool for understanding the biological signaling cascades that lead to disease outcomes following toxicity. The framework outlines downstream responses known as key events, culminating in a clinically significant adverse outcome as a final result of the toxic exposure. Here we use the AOP framework combined with artificial intelligence methods to gain novel insights into genetic mechanisms that underlie toxicity-mediated adverse health outcomes. Specifically, we focus on liver cancer as a case study with diverse underlying mechanisms that are clinically significant. Our approach uses two complementary AI techniques: Generative modeling via automated machine learning and genetic algorithms, and graph machine learning. We used data from the US Environmental Protection Agency’s Adverse Outcome Pathway Database (AOP-DB; <span>aopdb.epa.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg>) and the UK Biobank’s genetic data repository. We use the AOP-DB to extract disease-specific AOPs and build graph neural networks used in our final analyses. We use the UK Biobank to retrieve real-world genotype and phenotype data, where genotypes are based on single nucleotide polymorphism data extracted from the AOP-DB, and phenotypes are case/control cohorts for the disease of interest (liver cancer) corresponding to those adverse outcome pathways. We also use propensity score matching to appropriately sample based on important covariates (demographics, comorbidities, and social deprivation indices) and to balance the case and control populations in our machine language training/testing datasets. Finally, we describe a novel putative risk factor for LC that depends on genetic variation in both the aryl-hydrocarbon receptor (<em>AHR</em>) and ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 11 (<em>ABCB11</em>) genes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37651,"journal":{"name":"Computational Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10569310/pdf/nihms-1933008.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468111323000026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Adverse outcome pathways provide a powerful tool for understanding the biological signaling cascades that lead to disease outcomes following toxicity. The framework outlines downstream responses known as key events, culminating in a clinically significant adverse outcome as a final result of the toxic exposure. Here we use the AOP framework combined with artificial intelligence methods to gain novel insights into genetic mechanisms that underlie toxicity-mediated adverse health outcomes. Specifically, we focus on liver cancer as a case study with diverse underlying mechanisms that are clinically significant. Our approach uses two complementary AI techniques: Generative modeling via automated machine learning and genetic algorithms, and graph machine learning. We used data from the US Environmental Protection Agency’s Adverse Outcome Pathway Database (AOP-DB; aopdb.epa.gov) and the UK Biobank’s genetic data repository. We use the AOP-DB to extract disease-specific AOPs and build graph neural networks used in our final analyses. We use the UK Biobank to retrieve real-world genotype and phenotype data, where genotypes are based on single nucleotide polymorphism data extracted from the AOP-DB, and phenotypes are case/control cohorts for the disease of interest (liver cancer) corresponding to those adverse outcome pathways. We also use propensity score matching to appropriately sample based on important covariates (demographics, comorbidities, and social deprivation indices) and to balance the case and control populations in our machine language training/testing datasets. Finally, we describe a novel putative risk factor for LC that depends on genetic variation in both the aryl-hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) and ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 11 (ABCB11) genes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用启发式模拟和图形数据科学探索遗传对不良结果途径的影响。
不良结果通路为理解毒性后导致疾病结果的生物信号级联提供了一个强大的工具。该框架概述了被称为关键事件的下游反应,最终导致毒性暴露的临床显著不良结果。在这里,我们将AOP框架与人工智能方法相结合,以获得对毒性介导的不良健康结果背后的遗传机制的新见解。具体而言,我们将重点放在癌症作为一个具有不同潜在机制的案例研究,这些机制具有临床意义。我们的方法使用了两种互补的人工智能技术:通过自动机器学习和遗传算法的生成建模,以及图形机器学习。我们使用了来自美国环境保护局不良反应途径数据库(AOP-DB;aopdb.epa.gov)和英国生物银行基因数据库的数据。我们使用AOP-DB来提取疾病特异性AOP,并构建用于最终分析的图神经网络。我们使用英国生物库检索真实世界的基因型和表型数据,其中基因型基于从AOP-DB中提取的单核苷酸多态性数据,表型是与这些不良结果途径相对应的感兴趣疾病(癌症)的病例/对照组。我们还使用倾向得分匹配来根据重要的协变量(人口统计、合并症和社会剥夺指数)进行适当的抽样,并在我们的机器语言训练/测试数据集中平衡病例和对照人群。最后,我们描述了一种新的LC推定风险因子,该因子依赖于芳香烃受体(AHR)和ATP结合盒亚家族B成员11(ABCB11)基因的遗传变异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computational Toxicology
Computational Toxicology Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Computational Toxicology is an international journal publishing computational approaches that assist in the toxicological evaluation of new and existing chemical substances assisting in their safety assessment. -All effects relating to human health and environmental toxicity and fate -Prediction of toxicity, metabolism, fate and physico-chemical properties -The development of models from read-across, (Q)SARs, PBPK, QIVIVE, Multi-Scale Models -Big Data in toxicology: integration, management, analysis -Implementation of models through AOPs, IATA, TTC -Regulatory acceptance of models: evaluation, verification and validation -From metals, to small organic molecules to nanoparticles -Pharmaceuticals, pesticides, foods, cosmetics, fine chemicals -Bringing together the views of industry, regulators, academia, NGOs
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of QSAR models for tissue-specific predictive toxicology and risk assessment of military-relevant chemical exposures: A systematic review From model performance to decision support – The rise of computational toxicology in chemical safety assessments Development of chemical categories for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and the proof-of-concept approach to the identification of potential candidates for tiered toxicological testing and human health assessment The OECD (Q)SAR Assessment Framework: A tool for increasing regulatory uptake of computational approaches A developmental and reproductive toxicity adverse outcome pathway network to support safety assessments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1