Intensive Case Management to Reduce Hospital Readmissions: A Pilot Quality Improvement Project.

IF 0.8 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Professional Case Management Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1097/NCM.0000000000000645
Kate Shade, Paulina Hidalgo, Manuel Arteaga, Janet Rowland, Winnie Huang
{"title":"Intensive Case Management to Reduce Hospital Readmissions: A Pilot Quality Improvement Project.","authors":"Kate Shade,&nbsp;Paulina Hidalgo,&nbsp;Manuel Arteaga,&nbsp;Janet Rowland,&nbsp;Winnie Huang","doi":"10.1097/NCM.0000000000000645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of study: </strong>Hospital readmissions burden the U.S. health care system, and they have negative effects on patients and their families. The primary aim of this study was to pilot an intensive case management (ICM) intervention to reduce 30-day hospital readmissions. A secondary aim was to obtain patient- and caregiver-reported reasons for readmission.</p><p><strong>Primary practice setting: </strong>The setting was a vertically integrated health care system located in Northern California.</p><p><strong>Methodology and sample: </strong>This pilot quality improvement project occurred over a 4-month period. The intervention was delivered by master's degree students in nurse case management through an academic-clinical partnership. Patients hospitalized with a 30-day readmission were offered the ICM intervention. A total of 36 patients were identified and 20 accepted. Patient and/or caregiver was interviewed to identify reasons for their readmission. Data were collected about pre-/post-health care utilization including subsequent 30-day readmission. Mixed methods were used to analyze the findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen of 20 enrolled patients received the weekly ICM intervention for at least 30 days. Seven declined further contact before 30 days. Patient-reported reasons for readmission included being discharged too soon, poor communication among providers and with patients/families, lack of understanding about disease management and/or treatment options, and inadequate support. Several patients believed that their readmission was unavoidable due to the complexity of their illnesses. We compared 30-day readmissions for those who participated in and those who declined the ICM intervention, finding that those who received the ICM intervention had a lower readmission rate than those who did not receive the intervention (35% vs. 37.5%).</p>","PeriodicalId":45015,"journal":{"name":"Professional Case Management","volume":"28 6","pages":"271-279"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Professional Case Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NCM.0000000000000645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of study: Hospital readmissions burden the U.S. health care system, and they have negative effects on patients and their families. The primary aim of this study was to pilot an intensive case management (ICM) intervention to reduce 30-day hospital readmissions. A secondary aim was to obtain patient- and caregiver-reported reasons for readmission.

Primary practice setting: The setting was a vertically integrated health care system located in Northern California.

Methodology and sample: This pilot quality improvement project occurred over a 4-month period. The intervention was delivered by master's degree students in nurse case management through an academic-clinical partnership. Patients hospitalized with a 30-day readmission were offered the ICM intervention. A total of 36 patients were identified and 20 accepted. Patient and/or caregiver was interviewed to identify reasons for their readmission. Data were collected about pre-/post-health care utilization including subsequent 30-day readmission. Mixed methods were used to analyze the findings.

Results: Thirteen of 20 enrolled patients received the weekly ICM intervention for at least 30 days. Seven declined further contact before 30 days. Patient-reported reasons for readmission included being discharged too soon, poor communication among providers and with patients/families, lack of understanding about disease management and/or treatment options, and inadequate support. Several patients believed that their readmission was unavoidable due to the complexity of their illnesses. We compared 30-day readmissions for those who participated in and those who declined the ICM intervention, finding that those who received the ICM intervention had a lower readmission rate than those who did not receive the intervention (35% vs. 37.5%).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
强化病例管理以减少医院重新收费:一个试点质量改进项目。
研究目的:再次入院给美国医疗保健系统带来负担,对患者及其家人产生负面影响。本研究的主要目的是试行强化病例管理(ICM)干预措施,以减少30天的再次入院。第二个目的是获得患者和护理人员报告的再次入院原因。主要实践环境:该环境是位于北加利福尼亚州的一个垂直整合的医疗保健系统。方法和样本:该试点质量改进项目历时4个月。干预措施由护士病例管理专业的硕士生通过学术临床合作进行。对再次入院30天的住院患者进行ICM干预。共确认了36名患者,接受了20名患者。对患者和/或护理人员进行了访谈,以确定他们再次入院的原因。收集了有关医疗保健前后使用情况的数据,包括随后30天的再次入院。采用混合方法对研究结果进行分析。结果:20名入选患者中有13人接受了为期至少30天的每周ICM干预。7人在30天前拒绝进一步联系。患者报告的再次入院原因包括过早出院、提供者之间以及与患者/家属的沟通不畅、对疾病管理和/或治疗方案缺乏了解以及支持不足。一些患者认为,由于疾病的复杂性,他们的再次入院是不可避免的。我们比较了参与ICM干预和拒绝ICM干预的患者的30天再入院率,发现接受ICM干预者的再入院率低于未接受干预者(35%对37.5%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Professional Case Management
Professional Case Management HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
26.70%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Professional Case Management: The Leader in Evidence-Based Practice is a peer-reviewed, contemporary journal that crosses all case management settings. The Journal features best practices and industry benchmarks for the professional case manager and also features hands-on information for case managers new to the specialty. Articles focus on the coordination of services, management of payer issues, population- and disease-specific aspects of patient care, efficient use of resources, improving the quality of care/patient safety, data and outcomes analysis, and patient advocacy. The Journal provides practical, hands-on information for day-to-day activities, as well as cutting-edge research.
期刊最新文献
Case Management in Prevention of 30-Day Readmission in Post-Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. What Do Medicaid Members Want From Their Health Plan?: Insights From a Qualitative Study to Improve Engagement in Case Management. Gather "Round": An Integrated Care Model for the Emergency Department Multi-Visit Patient. Case Managers: Embracing Lifelong Learning. Editor's Commentary.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1