The effectiveness of cognitive bias modification in reducing substance use in detained juveniles: An RCT

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry Pub Date : 2023-10-05 DOI:10.1016/j.jbtep.2023.101916
Hans S. van der Baan , dr Annematt L. Collot D'Escury-Koenigs , dr Reinout W. Wiers
{"title":"The effectiveness of cognitive bias modification in reducing substance use in detained juveniles: An RCT","authors":"Hans S. van der Baan ,&nbsp;dr Annematt L. Collot D'Escury-Koenigs ,&nbsp;dr Reinout W. Wiers","doi":"10.1016/j.jbtep.2023.101916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><p>Young offenders show high levels of substance use. Treatment programs within detention settings are less effective. Cognitive bias modification (CBM) is a promising supplement to substance use treatment. This study tests the effectiveness of CBM in young offenders to reduce cannabis and alcohol use, and delinquent recidivism.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A randomized controlled trial added CBM to treatment as usual (TAU), among 181 youth in juvenile detention centers. In a factorial design, participants were randomly assigned to either active- or sham-training for two varieties of CBM, targeting attentional-bias (AtB) and approach-bias (ApB) for their most used substance. Substance use was measured with the Alcohol and Cannabis Use Disorder Identification Tests. Delinquent recidivism was measured with the International Self-Report Delinquency (ISRD) survey.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>At pretest, participants showed AtB but no ApB for both substances. For alcohol, a decrease was found in AtB in the active-training group. For cannabis, a decrease was found in AtB for both active- and sham-training groups. Regardless of condition, no effects were found on substance use or ISRD scores at follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>The sample is judicial, not clinical, as is the setting. TAU and participant goals are not necessarily substance related.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Young offenders show a significant attentional-bias towards substance cues. CBM changed attentional-biases but not substance use. Combining CBM with a motivational intervention is advised. Follow-up research should better integrate CBM with running treatment programs. New developments regarding CBM task design could be used that link training better to treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 101916"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005791623000836","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective

Young offenders show high levels of substance use. Treatment programs within detention settings are less effective. Cognitive bias modification (CBM) is a promising supplement to substance use treatment. This study tests the effectiveness of CBM in young offenders to reduce cannabis and alcohol use, and delinquent recidivism.

Method

A randomized controlled trial added CBM to treatment as usual (TAU), among 181 youth in juvenile detention centers. In a factorial design, participants were randomly assigned to either active- or sham-training for two varieties of CBM, targeting attentional-bias (AtB) and approach-bias (ApB) for their most used substance. Substance use was measured with the Alcohol and Cannabis Use Disorder Identification Tests. Delinquent recidivism was measured with the International Self-Report Delinquency (ISRD) survey.

Results

At pretest, participants showed AtB but no ApB for both substances. For alcohol, a decrease was found in AtB in the active-training group. For cannabis, a decrease was found in AtB for both active- and sham-training groups. Regardless of condition, no effects were found on substance use or ISRD scores at follow-up.

Limitations

The sample is judicial, not clinical, as is the setting. TAU and participant goals are not necessarily substance related.

Conclusions

Young offenders show a significant attentional-bias towards substance cues. CBM changed attentional-biases but not substance use. Combining CBM with a motivational intervention is advised. Follow-up research should better integrate CBM with running treatment programs. New developments regarding CBM task design could be used that link training better to treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知偏差矫正在减少被拘留青少年药物使用方面的有效性:随机对照试验。
背景和目的:青少年罪犯表现出高水平的药物使用。拘留场所内的治疗方案效果较差。认知偏差修正(CBM)是对物质使用治疗的一种很有前途的补充。本研究测试了CBM在青少年罪犯中减少大麻和酒精使用以及犯罪累犯的有效性。方法:一项随机对照试验在181名青少年拘留中心的青少年中加入CBM进行常规治疗(TAU)。在析因设计中,参与者被随机分配到两种CBM的主动或假训练中,即针对他们最常用物质的注意力偏差(AtB)和接近偏差(ApB)。物质使用是通过酒精和大麻使用障碍鉴定测试来衡量的。犯罪累犯是通过国际犯罪自我报告(ISRD)调查来衡量的。结果:在预测试中,参与者对这两种物质都表现出AtB,但没有ApB。在酒精方面,主动训练组的AtB有所下降。对于大麻,主动训练组和假训练组的AtB都有所下降。无论情况如何,在随访中都没有发现对药物使用或ISRD评分的影响。限制:样本是司法的,而不是临床的,就像环境一样。TAU和参与者目标不一定与实质内容相关。结论:青少年罪犯对物质线索表现出显著的注意偏向。CBM改变了注意力偏差,但没有改变物质使用。建议将CBM与动机干预相结合。后续研究应更好地将煤层气与正在运行的治疗计划结合起来。CBM任务设计方面的新进展可以用于更好地将训练与治疗联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The publication of the book Psychotherapy by Reciprocal Inhibition (1958) by the co-founding editor of this Journal, Joseph Wolpe, marked a major change in the understanding and treatment of mental disorders. The book used principles from empirical behavioral science to explain psychopathological phenomena and the resulting explanations were critically tested and used to derive effective treatments. The second half of the 20th century saw this rigorous scientific approach come to fruition. Experimental approaches to psychopathology, in particular those used to test conditioning theories and cognitive theories, have steadily expanded, and experimental analysis of processes characterising and maintaining mental disorders have become an established research area.
期刊最新文献
The effect of feedback in attention training on Attention Bias to Threat in individuals with Sluggish Cognitive Tempo Examining the causal effects of social exclusion on shame and dissociative detachment Editorial Board Neurophysiological effects of cognitive behavioral therapy in social anxiety: An ERP study using a dot-probe task A multilevel examination of an inhibitory retrieval approach to exposure: Differentiating the unique and combined effects of multiple-context and multiple-stimulus cues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1