The Participatory Implications of Racialized Policy Feedback.

IF 5.9 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE American Political Science Review Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-14 DOI:10.1017/s153759272100311x
Sergio Garcia-Rios, Nazita Lajevardi, Kassra A R Oskooii, Hannah L Walker
{"title":"The Participatory Implications of Racialized Policy Feedback.","authors":"Sergio Garcia-Rios,&nbsp;Nazita Lajevardi,&nbsp;Kassra A R Oskooii,&nbsp;Hannah L Walker","doi":"10.1017/s153759272100311x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>How do involuntary interactions with authoritarian institutions shape political engagement? The policy feedback literature suggests that interactions with authoritarian policies undercut political participation. However, research in racial and ethnic politics offers reason to believe that these experiences may increase citizens' engagement. Drawing on group attachment and discrimination research, we argue that mobilization is contingent on individuals' political psychological state. Relative to their counterparts, individuals with a politicized group identity will display higher odds of political engagement when exposed to authoritarian institutions. To evaluate our theory, we draw on the 2016 Collaborative Multiracial Post-Election Study to examine the experiences of Blacks, Latinos, and Asian Americans. For all subgroups and different types of institutions, we find that, for those with a politicized group identity, institutional contact is associated with higher odds of participation. Our research modifies the classic policy feedback framework, which neglects group-based narratives in the calculus of collective action.</p>","PeriodicalId":48451,"journal":{"name":"American Political Science Review","volume":"21 3","pages":"932-950"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10564389/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Political Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s153759272100311x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

How do involuntary interactions with authoritarian institutions shape political engagement? The policy feedback literature suggests that interactions with authoritarian policies undercut political participation. However, research in racial and ethnic politics offers reason to believe that these experiences may increase citizens' engagement. Drawing on group attachment and discrimination research, we argue that mobilization is contingent on individuals' political psychological state. Relative to their counterparts, individuals with a politicized group identity will display higher odds of political engagement when exposed to authoritarian institutions. To evaluate our theory, we draw on the 2016 Collaborative Multiracial Post-Election Study to examine the experiences of Blacks, Latinos, and Asian Americans. For all subgroups and different types of institutions, we find that, for those with a politicized group identity, institutional contact is associated with higher odds of participation. Our research modifies the classic policy feedback framework, which neglects group-based narratives in the calculus of collective action.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
种族化政策反馈的参与意义。
与专制机构的非自愿互动如何影响政治参与?政策反馈文献表明,与威权政策的互动削弱了政治参与。然而,对种族和民族政治的研究提供了理由,相信这些经历可能会增加公民的参与度。通过对群体依恋和歧视的研究,我们认为动员取决于个人的政治心理状态。与同行相比,具有政治化群体身份的个人在接触威权体制时,会表现出更高的政治参与几率。为了评估我们的理论,我们借鉴了2016年多种族选举后合作研究,考察了黑人、拉丁裔和亚裔美国人的经历。对于所有的亚群体和不同类型的机构,我们发现,对于那些具有政治化群体身份的人来说,机构接触与更高的参与几率有关。我们的研究修改了经典的政策反馈框架,该框架在集体行动的计算中忽略了基于群体的叙述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
119
期刊介绍: American Political Science Review is political science''s premier scholarly research journal, providing peer-reviewed articles and review essays from subfields throughout the discipline. Areas covered include political theory, American politics, public policy, public administration, comparative politics, and international relations. APSR has published continuously since 1906. American Political Science Review is sold ONLY as part of a joint subscription with Perspectives on Politics and PS: Political Science & Politics.
期刊最新文献
Survivorship analysis of CAD-CAM total shoulder replacement. Descriptive Representation and Party Building: Evidence from Municipal Governments in Brazil Domestic Distributional Roots of National Interest My History or Our History? Historical Revisionism and Entitlement to Lead Don’t Look Back in Anger: Cooperation Despite Conflicting Historical Narratives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1