Listening, reading, writing - which method leads to the best learning outcome?

IF 0.4 4区 农林科学 Q4 VETERINARY SCIENCES Tieraerztliche Praxis Ausgabe Kleintiere Heimtiere Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-11 DOI:10.1055/a-2136-7599
Janine Güldenpfennig, Alexander Bartel, Sebastian Arlt
{"title":"Listening, reading, writing - which method leads to the best learning outcome?","authors":"Janine Güldenpfennig,&nbsp;Alexander Bartel,&nbsp;Sebastian Arlt","doi":"10.1055/a-2136-7599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Innovative teaching strategies such as case-based learning and hands-on training are more and more integrated into undergraduate veterinary teaching. Nevertheless, it can be assumed that lectures still play an important role in many vet schools. Nowadays, however, lectures are questioned to be motivating and engaging enough for a long-lasting learning retention. In this context, we compared acceptance and learning outcome of the teaching methods reading, writing, and listening to a presentation.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In structured settings based on a cross-over design, 151 students in their fifth year attending a 2-weeks clinical rotation at the Clinic for Animal Reproduction were asked to read papers, listen to a presentation by a lecturer, and to write a summary in group work. Each task dealt with 1 of 3 topics from the field of animal reproduction. A week later, the students were asked to complete a multiple-choice test and an evaluation form. The test contained questions about each of the covered topics as well as a fourth topic, which was not taught in context of this project to assess the students' prior knowledge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed that writing a summary in group work led to the best learning outcome, but it cannot be ruled out that learning success may have depended to a large extent on group work. Furthermore, the results did not differ significantly from the second-best teaching method listening to a presentation. The teaching method students preferred most was the lecture, followed by reading papers and writing a summary.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We conclude that presentations by lecturers are still an important teaching method but can be complemented by writing tasks, which may be used in specific settings as a possible way to improve learning outcome in veterinary education.</p><p><strong>Conclusion for practice: </strong>Our project supports the assumption that more active, student-centered learning approaches such as writing summaries can lead to more engagement and a better learning retention. In addition, training writing skills is important because clinical reports and other written communication are relevant parts of daily veterinary routine.</p>","PeriodicalId":49434,"journal":{"name":"Tieraerztliche Praxis Ausgabe Kleintiere Heimtiere","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tieraerztliche Praxis Ausgabe Kleintiere Heimtiere","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2136-7599","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Innovative teaching strategies such as case-based learning and hands-on training are more and more integrated into undergraduate veterinary teaching. Nevertheless, it can be assumed that lectures still play an important role in many vet schools. Nowadays, however, lectures are questioned to be motivating and engaging enough for a long-lasting learning retention. In this context, we compared acceptance and learning outcome of the teaching methods reading, writing, and listening to a presentation.

Material and methods: In structured settings based on a cross-over design, 151 students in their fifth year attending a 2-weeks clinical rotation at the Clinic for Animal Reproduction were asked to read papers, listen to a presentation by a lecturer, and to write a summary in group work. Each task dealt with 1 of 3 topics from the field of animal reproduction. A week later, the students were asked to complete a multiple-choice test and an evaluation form. The test contained questions about each of the covered topics as well as a fourth topic, which was not taught in context of this project to assess the students' prior knowledge.

Results: The results revealed that writing a summary in group work led to the best learning outcome, but it cannot be ruled out that learning success may have depended to a large extent on group work. Furthermore, the results did not differ significantly from the second-best teaching method listening to a presentation. The teaching method students preferred most was the lecture, followed by reading papers and writing a summary.

Conclusions: We conclude that presentations by lecturers are still an important teaching method but can be complemented by writing tasks, which may be used in specific settings as a possible way to improve learning outcome in veterinary education.

Conclusion for practice: Our project supports the assumption that more active, student-centered learning approaches such as writing summaries can lead to more engagement and a better learning retention. In addition, training writing skills is important because clinical reports and other written communication are relevant parts of daily veterinary routine.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
听、读、写——哪种方法能获得最佳的学习效果?
目的:创新的教学策略,如案例学习和实践训练,越来越多地融入本科兽医教学。尽管如此,可以假设讲座在许多兽医学校仍然发挥着重要作用。然而,如今,人们质疑讲座是否足以激励和吸引人,以保持长期的学习。在此背景下,我们比较了阅读、写作和听演示的教学方法的接受度和学习效果。材料和方法:在基于交叉设计的结构化环境中,151名五年级的学生在动物繁殖诊所参加了为期两周的临床轮换,他们被要求阅读论文,听讲师的演讲,并在小组工作中写一篇总结。每项任务涉及动物繁殖领域的三个主题中的一个。一周后,学生们被要求完成一项多项选择题测试和一份评估表。该测试包含了关于每一个涵盖主题的问题,以及第四个主题,这不是在本项目中教授的,以评估学生的先前知识。结果:研究结果表明,在小组工作中写总结会带来最佳的学习结果,但不能排除学习成功在很大程度上取决于小组工作。此外,结果与第二好的听演示的教学方法没有显著差异。学生们最喜欢的教学方法是讲座,其次是阅读论文和撰写摘要。结论:我们得出的结论是,讲师的演讲仍然是一种重要的教学方法,但可以通过写作任务来补充,写作任务可以在特定环境中使用,作为提高兽医教育学习成果的一种可能方式。实践结论:我们的项目支持这样一种假设,即更积极、以学生为中心的学习方法,如写摘要,可以带来更多的参与度和更好的学习保留率。此外,培训写作技能很重要,因为临床报告和其他书面交流是兽医日常工作的相关部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
108
期刊介绍: Die Tierärztliche Praxis wendet sich mit ihren beiden Reihen als einzige veterinärmedizinische Fachzeitschrift explizit an den Großtier- bzw. Kleintierpraktiker und garantiert damit eine zielgruppengenaue Ansprache. Für den Spezialisten bietet sie Original- oder Übersichtsartikel zu neuen Therapie- und Operationsverfahren oder den Einsatz moderner bildgebender Verfahren. Der weniger spezialisierte Tierarzt oder Berufseinsteiger findet auf seinen Berufsalltag zugeschnittene praxisbezogene Beiträge in der Fortbildungsrubrik „Aus Studium und Praxis“. Mit dem hervorgehobenen „Fazit für die Praxis“ am Ende jedes Artikels verschafft sich auch der eilige Leser einen raschen Überblick über die wichtigsten Inhalte dieser modern konzipierten Fachzeitschrift mit den vielen hochwertigen, überwiegend farbigen Abbildungen. In jedem Heft ermöglicht ein ATF-anerkannter Fortbildungsartikel den Erwerb einer ATF-Stunde (Akademie für tierärztliche Fortbildung).
期刊最新文献
[A malignant pilomatrixoma in the tonsillar area of a dog]. [Arthroscopic removal of the fragmented medial coronoid process in dogs - Evaluation of treatment results with special reference to postoperative computed tomography and residual particles]. [Canine sterile neutrophilic dermatosis (Sweet-like syndrome): A description of 3 cases]. [Hemophilia A in a male cat with intermittent lameness]. [Nephrectomy in a rabbit with renal adenocarcinoma].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1