Empowering Family Glaucoma Risk Communication Using QR-Code-Mediated Online Intervention

IF 2.8 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ophthalmology. Glaucoma Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ogla.2023.10.006
Shahin Hallaj MD , Sagar J. Shah BS , Eli K. Cehelyk MPH , Lauren E. Hock MD , Daniel Lee MD , Reza Razeghinejad MD , Jonathan S. Myers MD , Rosemary Frasso PhD, MSc , Natasha Nayak Kolomeyer MD
{"title":"Empowering Family Glaucoma Risk Communication Using QR-Code-Mediated Online Intervention","authors":"Shahin Hallaj MD ,&nbsp;Sagar J. Shah BS ,&nbsp;Eli K. Cehelyk MPH ,&nbsp;Lauren E. Hock MD ,&nbsp;Daniel Lee MD ,&nbsp;Reza Razeghinejad MD ,&nbsp;Jonathan S. Myers MD ,&nbsp;Rosemary Frasso PhD, MSc ,&nbsp;Natasha Nayak Kolomeyer MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ogla.2023.10.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Attempts at engaging relatives of glaucoma patients in education and screening have had limited success. This study explores the feasibility of an electronic intervention to facilitate direct yet reliable glaucoma risk communication between open-angle glaucoma patients (probands) and their first-degree relatives (FDRs).</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Prospective survey and assessment of intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Fifty adult probands, engaging 140 FDRs.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Phase I was an iterative process involving creating a customized website and Quick Response (QR)-code-based intervention designed with input from probands, FDRs of patients, community members, and researchers. In phase II, the intervention was deployed in a clinical setting; this involved recruiting probands who had a smartphone and were willing to use the QR-code to message their FDRs a standard message, including a website link about glaucoma risk in FDRs and the importance of getting examined. Follow-up interviews were conducted with probands 1 to 2 weeks after their clinic visit to assess the impact of the intervention. Demographic data, website analytics, and participant feedback were collected and analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>Increased awareness of glaucoma risk among FDRs and enhanced discussions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>At the time of the first interview, probands reported that 70% of the FDRs were aware of the probands' glaucoma diagnosis, but only 26% had undergone glaucoma screening. Ninety percent of probands had no issues using the QR-codes. Website analytics recorded 73 visits from 51 distinct internet protocol addresses (IPs). After receiving the standard message, 95% of FDRs followed up with the probands, actively discussing glaucoma. Of the probands, 84% completed the follow-up interview 1 to 2 weeks after enrollment. Fifty-nine percent of the FDRs were reported to have scheduled screening appointments. The collected feedback revealed that 96% of probands found the intervention helpful, fostering glaucoma discussions with their FDRs and improving probands’ comfort level in discussing health issues with FDRs from baseline (very comfortable: 88%, comfortable: 8%, neutral: 2%, and very uncomfortable: 2%) to the follow-up interview (very comfortable: 98% and comfortable: 2%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This innovative online method of communicating the risk of glaucoma to FDRs of probands prompted and increased the comfort level of familial discussions of glaucoma. More than half of FDRs reported making an appointment to get screened for glaucoma.</p></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><p>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19519,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258941962300193X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Attempts at engaging relatives of glaucoma patients in education and screening have had limited success. This study explores the feasibility of an electronic intervention to facilitate direct yet reliable glaucoma risk communication between open-angle glaucoma patients (probands) and their first-degree relatives (FDRs).

Design

Prospective survey and assessment of intervention.

Participants

Fifty adult probands, engaging 140 FDRs.

Methods

Phase I was an iterative process involving creating a customized website and Quick Response (QR)-code-based intervention designed with input from probands, FDRs of patients, community members, and researchers. In phase II, the intervention was deployed in a clinical setting; this involved recruiting probands who had a smartphone and were willing to use the QR-code to message their FDRs a standard message, including a website link about glaucoma risk in FDRs and the importance of getting examined. Follow-up interviews were conducted with probands 1 to 2 weeks after their clinic visit to assess the impact of the intervention. Demographic data, website analytics, and participant feedback were collected and analyzed.

Main Outcome Measures

Increased awareness of glaucoma risk among FDRs and enhanced discussions.

Results

At the time of the first interview, probands reported that 70% of the FDRs were aware of the probands' glaucoma diagnosis, but only 26% had undergone glaucoma screening. Ninety percent of probands had no issues using the QR-codes. Website analytics recorded 73 visits from 51 distinct internet protocol addresses (IPs). After receiving the standard message, 95% of FDRs followed up with the probands, actively discussing glaucoma. Of the probands, 84% completed the follow-up interview 1 to 2 weeks after enrollment. Fifty-nine percent of the FDRs were reported to have scheduled screening appointments. The collected feedback revealed that 96% of probands found the intervention helpful, fostering glaucoma discussions with their FDRs and improving probands’ comfort level in discussing health issues with FDRs from baseline (very comfortable: 88%, comfortable: 8%, neutral: 2%, and very uncomfortable: 2%) to the follow-up interview (very comfortable: 98% and comfortable: 2%).

Conclusions

This innovative online method of communicating the risk of glaucoma to FDRs of probands prompted and increased the comfort level of familial discussions of glaucoma. More than half of FDRs reported making an appointment to get screened for glaucoma.

Financial Disclosure(s)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用二维码介导的在线干预增强家庭青光眼风险沟通能力。
目的:让青光眼患者亲属参与教育和筛查的尝试收效甚微。本研究探讨了电子干预的可行性,以促进开角型青光眼患者(先证者)及其一级亲属(FDRs)之间直接而可靠的青光眼风险沟通。设计:干预的前瞻性调查和评估。参与者:50名成年先证者,参与140名FDR。方法、干预或测试:第一阶段是一个迭代过程,包括创建一个定制的网站和基于快速响应(QR)代码的干预,该干预是根据先证者、患者的FDR、社区成员和研究人员的输入设计的。在第二阶段,干预措施部署在临床环境中;这涉及到招募那些拥有智能手机并愿意使用二维码向FDRs发送标准信息的先证者,包括一个关于FDRs青光眼风险和接受检查重要性的网站链接。在先证者就诊1-2周后对其进行随访访谈,以评估干预的影响。收集并分析了人口统计数据、网站分析和参与者反馈。主要结果指标:FDRs对青光眼风险的认识提高并加强讨论结果:在第一次访谈时,先证者报告称,70%的FDRs知道先证者的青光眼诊断,但只有26%接受了青光眼筛查。90%的先证者使用二维码没有问题。网站分析记录了来自51个不同IP的73次访问。在收到标准信息后,95%的FDR对先证者进行了随访,积极讨论青光眼。84%的先证者在入组后1-2周完成了随访。据报道,59%的FDRs有预定的筛查预约。收集到的反馈显示,96%的先证者认为干预有帮助,从基线(非常舒适:88%,舒适:8%,中性:2%,非常不舒服:2%)到后续访谈(非常舒服:98%,舒适:2%),促进与FDR讨论青光眼,并提高先证者与FDR谈论健康问题的舒适度增加了青光眼家族讨论的舒适度。超过一半的FDR报告称,他们预约了青光眼筛查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
140
审稿时长
46 days
期刊最新文献
Contents Editorial Board Advanced Imaging in Traumatic Glaucoma: Detection of Intralenticular Foreign Body Starstruck Lens: Iatrogenic Rosette Cataract and Its Spontaneous Resolution Unusual Posterior Capsular Pigmentation in Axenfeld–Rieger Anomaly
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1