Quality of DNA extracted from freshwater fish scales and mucus and its application in genetic diversity studies of Perca fluviatilis and Rutilus rutilus.
Ieva Ignatavičienė, Adomas Ragauskas, Vytautas Rakauskas, Dalius Butkauskas
{"title":"Quality of DNA extracted from freshwater fish scales and mucus and its application in genetic diversity studies of <i>Perca fluviatilis</i> and <i>Rutilus rutilus</i>.","authors":"Ieva Ignatavičienė, Adomas Ragauskas, Vytautas Rakauskas, Dalius Butkauskas","doi":"10.1093/biomethods/bpad022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies on genetic diversity require biological material containing a reliable source of DNA that can be extracted and analyzed. Recently, non-invasive sampling has become a preferred sampling method of biological material. The suitability of a less invasive approach that involves obtaining samples by swabbing the fish skin (including live, non-anesthetized fish) should be considered. In this study, we compared the efficiency of DNA extraction, amplification, and sequencing of mtDNA fragments of two fish species <i>Perca fluviatilis</i> and <i>Rutilus rutilus</i> based on DNA collected from the scales and mucus using the modified Aljanabi and Martinez method. The results revealed a higher quality of DNA extracted from the mucus; however, the mean DNA concentration obtained from the scales of both fish species was higher. We verified the method suitable for amplification and sequencing of mtDNA fragments of both fish species using newly designed markers (D-loop, ATP6) and examined the potential risk of intraspecific cross-contamination. The DNA sequence alignment analysis revealed identical sequences attributed to the same individual when DNA, extracted from two different sources (scales and mucus), was used. We demonstrated that the quantity and quality of DNA extracted from the scales and mucus using the proposed method were high enough to carry out genetic diversity studies based on sampling of live fish with the possibility to release it after collecting samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":36528,"journal":{"name":"Biology Methods and Protocols","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10561993/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology Methods and Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/biomethods/bpad022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Studies on genetic diversity require biological material containing a reliable source of DNA that can be extracted and analyzed. Recently, non-invasive sampling has become a preferred sampling method of biological material. The suitability of a less invasive approach that involves obtaining samples by swabbing the fish skin (including live, non-anesthetized fish) should be considered. In this study, we compared the efficiency of DNA extraction, amplification, and sequencing of mtDNA fragments of two fish species Perca fluviatilis and Rutilus rutilus based on DNA collected from the scales and mucus using the modified Aljanabi and Martinez method. The results revealed a higher quality of DNA extracted from the mucus; however, the mean DNA concentration obtained from the scales of both fish species was higher. We verified the method suitable for amplification and sequencing of mtDNA fragments of both fish species using newly designed markers (D-loop, ATP6) and examined the potential risk of intraspecific cross-contamination. The DNA sequence alignment analysis revealed identical sequences attributed to the same individual when DNA, extracted from two different sources (scales and mucus), was used. We demonstrated that the quantity and quality of DNA extracted from the scales and mucus using the proposed method were high enough to carry out genetic diversity studies based on sampling of live fish with the possibility to release it after collecting samples.