Eduardo Anitua, Asier Eguia, Mohammad Hamdan Alkhraisat
{"title":"Clinical Performance of Splinted 4.5-mm Extra-Short Implants: A Controlled Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Eduardo Anitua, Asier Eguia, Mohammad Hamdan Alkhraisat","doi":"10.11607/prd.6877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study compared the survival, marginal bone loss (MBL), and prosthetic complications of 4.5-mm extra-short implants and longer implants splinted to the short implants via the restoration. A retrospective controlled cohort study was performed. The 4.5-mm extra-short group (study group; SG) included 48 consecutively placed implants. The control group (CG) included 48 implants splinted to the extra-short implants. The same surgical team treated the 39 included patients, and all implants were restored with a screw-retained fixed restoration and intermediate abutments. Im- mediate and conventionally loaded implants were included. All implants were in function during the follow-up period (14 ± 3.4 and 17 ± 13 months for SG and CG, respectively). No differences in techni- cal complications were observed between the groups (one and two cases of screw loosening for SG and CG, respectively; two provisional prosthesis fractures for SG; P = .310). Marginal bone stability was similar for SG and CG at the mesial level (-0.01 ± 0.28 mm for SG vs -0.18 ± 0.72 mm for CG; P = .270) and at the distal level (0.02 ± 0.39 mm for SG vs -0.18 ± 0.68 mm for CG; P = .076). The same good clinical performance could be observed for 4.5-mm implants and longer implants under the same prosthesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":94231,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.6877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study compared the survival, marginal bone loss (MBL), and prosthetic complications of 4.5-mm extra-short implants and longer implants splinted to the short implants via the restoration. A retrospective controlled cohort study was performed. The 4.5-mm extra-short group (study group; SG) included 48 consecutively placed implants. The control group (CG) included 48 implants splinted to the extra-short implants. The same surgical team treated the 39 included patients, and all implants were restored with a screw-retained fixed restoration and intermediate abutments. Im- mediate and conventionally loaded implants were included. All implants were in function during the follow-up period (14 ± 3.4 and 17 ± 13 months for SG and CG, respectively). No differences in techni- cal complications were observed between the groups (one and two cases of screw loosening for SG and CG, respectively; two provisional prosthesis fractures for SG; P = .310). Marginal bone stability was similar for SG and CG at the mesial level (-0.01 ± 0.28 mm for SG vs -0.18 ± 0.72 mm for CG; P = .270) and at the distal level (0.02 ± 0.39 mm for SG vs -0.18 ± 0.68 mm for CG; P = .076). The same good clinical performance could be observed for 4.5-mm implants and longer implants under the same prosthesis.
目的:比较4.5毫米超短植入物和更长植入物与同一类型植入物拼接的存活率、边缘骨丢失(MBL)和假体并发症。材料和方法:进行回顾性对照队列研究。4.5毫米超短组(研究组;SG)包括48个符合纳入标准的连续放置的植入物。对照组(CG)包括48个用夹板固定的植入物。同一个外科团队治疗了39名患者,所有植入物都用螺钉固定修复体和中间基牙进行了修复。包括即时和常规加载的植入物。结果:所有植入物在随访期间均处于功能状态(SG和CG分别为14±3.4 SD和17±13 SD月)。两组之间的技术并发症没有差异(SG和CG螺钉松动1和2次;SG临时假体骨折2次;p=0.310)。SG和CG的边缘骨稳定性在近端水平(SG:平均值-0.01±0.28 SD mm Vs CG平均值-0.18±0.72 SD mm;p=0.270)和远端水平(SG:平均值0.02±0.39 SD mm Vs SG平均值-0.118±0.68 SD mm;p=0.076)相似结论:在相同的假体下,4.5mm的植入物和更长的植入物可以观察到同样良好的临床性能。