Psychologic Factors in Temporomandibular Disorders and Somatization: A Multidimensional Analysis of Personality, Coping, and Distress Among Young Adults.

Adrian Ujin Yap, Carolina Marpaung
{"title":"Psychologic Factors in Temporomandibular Disorders and Somatization: A Multidimensional Analysis of Personality, Coping, and Distress Among Young Adults.","authors":"Adrian Ujin Yap, Carolina Marpaung","doi":"10.11607/ijp.8590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze the association of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) and somatic symptoms with the psychologic variables of personality, coping, and distress in young adults. Physical and psychologic correlates were also explored, along with the risk factors for TMDs/somatization.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Participants were enlisted from a local university, and the presence of TMDs and somatic symptoms was determined with the Short-form Fonseca Anamnestic Index and Patient Health Questionnaire-15. The psychologic variables of personality, coping, and distress were assessed with the Big-Five Personality Inventory-10; brief-COPE Inventory; and Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scales-21, respectively. Statistical evaluations were performed with Mann-Whitney U test, Spearman correlation, and logistic regression analyses (α = .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 455 participants (mean age: 22.7 ± 1.2 years), 18.2% and 5.7% had TMDs and medium-to-high somatization, respectively. Participants with TMDs exhibited substantially higher somatization and psychologic distress scores than those with no TMDs. Significant differences in TMDs, conscientiousness, extraversion, and psychologic distress scores were observed between participants with no-to-mild and medium-to-high somatization. The association between TMD and somatization scores was weak but significant. Neuroticism and dysfunctional coping style were moderately correlated to general distress, depression, anxiety, and stress (rs = 0.44 to 0.62).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that anxiety is the main risk factor for the presence of TMDs and medium-tohigh somatization in nonclinical young adults, while conscientiousness is a protective factor for somatization.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"605-614"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the association of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) and somatic symptoms with the psychologic variables of personality, coping, and distress in young adults. Physical and psychologic correlates were also explored, along with the risk factors for TMDs/somatization.

Materials and methods: Participants were enlisted from a local university, and the presence of TMDs and somatic symptoms was determined with the Short-form Fonseca Anamnestic Index and Patient Health Questionnaire-15. The psychologic variables of personality, coping, and distress were assessed with the Big-Five Personality Inventory-10; brief-COPE Inventory; and Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scales-21, respectively. Statistical evaluations were performed with Mann-Whitney U test, Spearman correlation, and logistic regression analyses (α = .05).

Results: Among the 455 participants (mean age: 22.7 ± 1.2 years), 18.2% and 5.7% had TMDs and medium-to-high somatization, respectively. Participants with TMDs exhibited substantially higher somatization and psychologic distress scores than those with no TMDs. Significant differences in TMDs, conscientiousness, extraversion, and psychologic distress scores were observed between participants with no-to-mild and medium-to-high somatization. The association between TMD and somatization scores was weak but significant. Neuroticism and dysfunctional coping style were moderately correlated to general distress, depression, anxiety, and stress (rs = 0.44 to 0.62).

Conclusions: Findings suggest that anxiety is the main risk factor for the presence of TMDs and medium-tohigh somatization in nonclinical young adults, while conscientiousness is a protective factor for somatization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颞下颌关节紊乱和躯体化的心理因素:年轻人个性、应对和痛苦的多维分析。
目的:分析年轻人颞下颌关节紊乱(TMD)和躯体症状与人格、应对和痛苦等心理变量的关系。材料和方法:参与者从当地大学招募,并使用简短的丰塞卡记忆指数和患者健康问卷15确定TMDs和躯体症状的存在。人格、应对和痛苦的心理变量分别用五大人格量表-10、简要的COPE量表和抑郁、焦虑、压力量表-21进行评估。结果:455名参与者(平均年龄22.7±1.2岁)中,分别有18.2%和5.7%患有TMDs和中度至高度躯体化。患有TMDs的参与者表现出比没有TMDs的人高得多的躯体化和心理困扰评分。在无至轻度和中度至高度躯体化的参与者之间,观察到TMD、尽责性、外向性和心理痛苦评分的显著差异。TMD与躯体化评分之间的相关性虽然显著,但较弱。神经质和功能失调的应对方式与一般痛苦、抑郁、焦虑和压力适度相关(rs=0.44-0.62)。结论:研究结果表明,焦虑是非临床年轻人出现TMDs和中高度躯体化的主要危险因素,而尽责性是躯体化的保护因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Food-Simulating Liquids on Hydrolytic Behavior of Resin Matrix Ceramics. A Pilot Study to Predict Lifetime of Resin-Based Materials for Denture: Presentation of an In Vitro Thermally-Accelerated Ageing Method. In Vitro Comparison of Surface Characteristics and Bacterial Adhesion in Composite Resin-Based Materials for Additive, Subtractive, and Conventional Manufacturing. Reference CAD-CAM Samples for Dental Shade Communication for Successful Aesthetic Outcome. An Investigation of Stress Distribution Between Two Different Implant Concept in Implant-Supported Maxillary Prostheses with Different Framework Materials: A Finite Element Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1