Predicting fracture classification and prognosis with hounsfield units and femoral cortical index: A simple and cost-effective approach

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Science Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jos.2023.08.020
{"title":"Predicting fracture classification and prognosis with hounsfield units and femoral cortical index: A simple and cost-effective approach","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jos.2023.08.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>The relationship between bone density and fracture has been widely studied and recognized, and the role of cortical bone in proximal </span>femoral fractures<span> has also been increasingly studied. However, both the determination of bone mineral density (BMD) and the determination of cortical mass are expensive and cumbersome. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether two readily available indicators, Hounsfield Units (HUs) and femoral cortical index (FCI), can be used to predict hip fracture classification and prognosis.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>A retrospective study was conducted on 110 patients with hip fragility fractures. Cortical index was calculated on fractured and </span>contralateral<span> femur FCI, with HUs calculated on the proximal femur. The correlation of the FCI and HU with diabetes, hypertension, and related indicators, such as albumin, creatinine, and urea nitrogen levels, were also analyzed in the study.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Both the Evans classification of intertrochanteric fractures and the Garden and Pauwels classifications of </span>femoral neck fractures<span> showed that as the severity of the fracture increased, the HUs and FCI decreased. Age and albumin level also had a negative correlation with HUs and FCI. There was also a significant correlation between HUs and FCI.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The HUs and FCI, which can be easily and quickly obtained, can be used to predict the classification and prognosis of hip fractures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","volume":"29 5","pages":"Pages 1274-1279"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0949265823002592","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The relationship between bone density and fracture has been widely studied and recognized, and the role of cortical bone in proximal femoral fractures has also been increasingly studied. However, both the determination of bone mineral density (BMD) and the determination of cortical mass are expensive and cumbersome. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether two readily available indicators, Hounsfield Units (HUs) and femoral cortical index (FCI), can be used to predict hip fracture classification and prognosis.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on 110 patients with hip fragility fractures. Cortical index was calculated on fractured and contralateral femur FCI, with HUs calculated on the proximal femur. The correlation of the FCI and HU with diabetes, hypertension, and related indicators, such as albumin, creatinine, and urea nitrogen levels, were also analyzed in the study.

Results

Both the Evans classification of intertrochanteric fractures and the Garden and Pauwels classifications of femoral neck fractures showed that as the severity of the fracture increased, the HUs and FCI decreased. Age and albumin level also had a negative correlation with HUs and FCI. There was also a significant correlation between HUs and FCI.

Conclusions

The HUs and FCI, which can be easily and quickly obtained, can be used to predict the classification and prognosis of hip fractures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用hounsfield单位和股骨皮质指数预测骨折分类和预后:一种简单且成本效益高的方法。
背景:骨密度与骨折之间的关系已经得到了广泛的研究和认可,皮质骨在股骨近端骨折中的作用也得到了越来越多的研究。然而,骨密度(BMD)的测定和皮质质量的测定都是昂贵和繁琐的。本研究的目的是研究两个现成的指标,Hounsfield单位(HUs)和股骨皮质指数(FCI),是否可以用于预测髋部骨折的分类和预后。方法:对110例髋部脆性骨折患者进行回顾性分析。计算骨折和对侧股骨FCI的皮质指数,计算股骨近端的HU。研究中还分析了FCI和HU与糖尿病、高血压和相关指标(如白蛋白、肌酐和尿素氮水平)的相关性。结果:股骨粗隆间骨折的Evans分类和股骨颈骨折的Garden和Pauwels分类均显示,随着骨折严重程度的增加,HUs和FCI降低。年龄和白蛋白水平也与HUs和FCI呈负相关。HUs与FCI之间也存在显著相关性。结论:HUs和FCI可以很容易、快速地获得,可用于预测髋部骨折的分类和预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Science
Journal of Orthopaedic Science 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Science is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. The journal publishes the latest researches and topical debates in all fields of clinical and experimental orthopaedics, including musculoskeletal medicine, sports medicine, locomotive syndrome, trauma, paediatrics, oncology and biomaterials, as well as basic researches.
期刊最新文献
Clinical characteristics and results after conservative treatment or interfascicular neurolysis of 100 limbs with spontaneous anterior interosseous nerve palsy: A prospective Japanese multicenter study. Minimal clinically important difference in the Japanese Orthopedic Association Score and shoulder 36 after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in a Japanese population: A retrospective cohort study. What is the appropriate revascularisation approach in traumatic popliteal artery injury? Platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of delayed union and nonunion fractures: An umbrella meta-analysis. Analysis of cancer multigene panel testing for osteosarcoma in pediatric and adults using the center for cancer genomics and advanced therapeutics database in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1