Subsidiarity and Participation in an Age of Catholic Mega-Systems.

IF 0.4 Q4 MEDICAL ETHICS Linacre Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-21 DOI:10.1177/00243639221116161
Jacquelyn Harootunian-Cutts
{"title":"Subsidiarity and Participation in an Age of Catholic Mega-Systems.","authors":"Jacquelyn Harootunian-Cutts","doi":"10.1177/00243639221116161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While the number of Catholic healthcare facilities has held stable over the last several decades, Catholic healthcare has followed the trend of merging facilities and systems into \"mega-systems.\" These consolidations can be beneficial for creating continuums of care, lowering operating costs, ensuring long-term viability, and sharing physical, digital, and human resources. However, with larger systems comes a practical need to be integrated to some degree, and the pressure to standardize policies and practices across regions is present. To address this need and pressure, the Catholic Social Teaching principles of subsidiarity and participation should guide system and local administrators. Subsidiarity and participation encourage all decision making to happen at the most local levels and to include as many of the people those decisions affect as possible. I will review both the pragmatic benefits of keeping decisions as local and rooted as possible as well as the moral benefits of allowing as many administrators and health care professionals to exercise and form their virtues as moral agents. In a time when changes to medical care have created many procedural responsibilities and cut into time spent in moral witness, institutions, even mega-systems, should remain attentive to the ways in which the moral agents of their system are formed and exercised.</p>","PeriodicalId":44238,"journal":{"name":"Linacre Quarterly","volume":"90 3","pages":"306-319"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10566486/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linacre Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00243639221116161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While the number of Catholic healthcare facilities has held stable over the last several decades, Catholic healthcare has followed the trend of merging facilities and systems into "mega-systems." These consolidations can be beneficial for creating continuums of care, lowering operating costs, ensuring long-term viability, and sharing physical, digital, and human resources. However, with larger systems comes a practical need to be integrated to some degree, and the pressure to standardize policies and practices across regions is present. To address this need and pressure, the Catholic Social Teaching principles of subsidiarity and participation should guide system and local administrators. Subsidiarity and participation encourage all decision making to happen at the most local levels and to include as many of the people those decisions affect as possible. I will review both the pragmatic benefits of keeping decisions as local and rooted as possible as well as the moral benefits of allowing as many administrators and health care professionals to exercise and form their virtues as moral agents. In a time when changes to medical care have created many procedural responsibilities and cut into time spent in moral witness, institutions, even mega-systems, should remain attentive to the ways in which the moral agents of their system are formed and exercised.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
天主教大系统时代的辅助性和参与性。
尽管天主教医疗机构的数量在过去几十年中保持稳定,但天主教医疗机构遵循了将机构和系统合并为“大型系统”的趋势。这些合并有利于创造持续的医疗服务,降低运营成本,确保长期生存能力,并共享物理、数字和人力资源。然而,随着系统的扩大,实际需要在一定程度上进行整合,并且存在着跨区域标准化政策和做法的压力。为了解决这一需求和压力,天主教社会教学的辅助性和参与性原则应指导系统和地方行政人员。辅助性和参与性鼓励所有决策在最地方一级进行,并尽可能多地包括这些决策所影响的人。我将审查保持决策尽可能本地化和扎根的务实好处,以及允许尽可能多的行政人员和医疗保健专业人员作为道德代理人行使和形成他们的美德的道德好处。在医疗保健的变化产生了许多程序性责任,并减少了在道德见证方面花费的时间的时代,机构,甚至是大型系统,都应该关注其系统的道德代理人的形成和行使方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Linacre Quarterly
Linacre Quarterly MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
40.00%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
Appalachia - Bridging the Opioid Epidemic Amid the Fentanyl Crisis. Challenges, Conflicts, and Opportunities. Philosophical and Moral Issues of Organ Transplantation at the Close of the Twentieth Century. God and the Imperfect Practice of Medicine. A Forensic Investigation and Critique of Suicidal Ideation Reported in a Turnaway Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1