Black-box tests for algorithmic stability.

IF 1.4 4区 数学 Q2 MATHEMATICS, APPLIED Information and Inference-A Journal of the Ima Pub Date : 2023-10-14 eCollection Date: 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1093/imaiai/iaad039
Byol Kim, Rina Foygel Barber
{"title":"Black-box tests for algorithmic stability.","authors":"Byol Kim, Rina Foygel Barber","doi":"10.1093/imaiai/iaad039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Algorithmic stability is a concept from learning theory that expresses the degree to which changes to the input data (e.g. removal of a single data point) may affect the outputs of a regression algorithm. Knowing an algorithm's stability properties is often useful for many downstream applications-for example, stability is known to lead to desirable generalization properties and predictive inference guarantees. However, many modern algorithms currently used in practice are too complex for a theoretical analysis of their stability properties, and thus we can only attempt to establish these properties through an empirical exploration of the algorithm's behaviour on various datasets. In this work, we lay out a formal statistical framework for this kind of <i>black-box testing</i> without any assumptions on the algorithm or the data distribution, and establish fundamental bounds on the ability of any black-box test to identify algorithmic stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":45437,"journal":{"name":"Information and Inference-A Journal of the Ima","volume":"12 4","pages":"2690-2719"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10576650/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information and Inference-A Journal of the Ima","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/imaiai/iaad039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Algorithmic stability is a concept from learning theory that expresses the degree to which changes to the input data (e.g. removal of a single data point) may affect the outputs of a regression algorithm. Knowing an algorithm's stability properties is often useful for many downstream applications-for example, stability is known to lead to desirable generalization properties and predictive inference guarantees. However, many modern algorithms currently used in practice are too complex for a theoretical analysis of their stability properties, and thus we can only attempt to establish these properties through an empirical exploration of the algorithm's behaviour on various datasets. In this work, we lay out a formal statistical framework for this kind of black-box testing without any assumptions on the algorithm or the data distribution, and establish fundamental bounds on the ability of any black-box test to identify algorithmic stability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
算法稳定性的黑盒测试
算法稳定性是学习理论中的一个概念,它表达了输入数据的变化(例如去除单个数据点)可能影响回归算法输出的程度。知道算法的稳定性特性通常对许多下游应用有用,例如,已知稳定性会导致期望的泛化特性和预测推理保证。然而,目前在实践中使用的许多现代算法过于复杂,无法对其稳定性特性进行理论分析,因此我们只能尝试通过对算法在各种数据集上的行为进行经验探索来建立这些特性。在这项工作中,我们为这种黑箱测试制定了一个正式的统计框架,而不对算法或数据分布进行任何假设,并对任何黑箱测试识别算法稳定性的能力建立了基本界限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
The Dyson equalizer: adaptive noise stabilization for low-rank signal detection and recovery. Bi-stochastically normalized graph Laplacian: convergence to manifold Laplacian and robustness to outlier noise. Phase transition and higher order analysis of Lq regularization under dependence. On statistical inference with high-dimensional sparse CCA. Black-box tests for algorithmic stability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1