Investigating the impact of ‘dark nudges’ on drinking intentions: A between groups, randomized and online experimental study

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL British Journal of Health Psychology Pub Date : 2023-10-15 DOI:10.1111/bjhp.12698
Joel Lewin, Matt Field, Emma Davies
{"title":"Investigating the impact of ‘dark nudges’ on drinking intentions: A between groups, randomized and online experimental study","authors":"Joel Lewin,&nbsp;Matt Field,&nbsp;Emma Davies","doi":"10.1111/bjhp.12698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study explored how ‘dark nudges’ (tactics used in alcohol industry-funded responsible drinking campaigns) affect drinking intentions, perceived source credibility and whether individual differences in perceptions of prototypical drinkers moderated these effects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Two 2 × 2 between-groups online experimental studies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 164) presented three alcohol health messages per condition, comprising social norm (healthy/unhealthy (“dark nudge”)) by frame (loss/gain). Study 2 (<i>N</i> = 229) presented one message per condition, comprising cancer causality (single cause/multiple causes (dark nudge)) by funding disclosure (disclosure/non-disclosure (dark nudge)). Outcomes were drinking intentions and perceived source credibility. Exploratory analyses considered prototype perceptions as a between-subjects moderator.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>No significant effects of message frame, social norm, fundi or multiple cancer causality arguments on drinking intentions were found. In Study 2, in the dark nudge multiple cancer causality conditions, perceived source credibility was high when funding was undisclosed, but significantly lower when it was disclosed. Exploratory analyses suggested effects were moderated by prototype similarity. In Study 1, higher perceived similarity to a heavy drinker and lower perceived similarity to a responsible drinker were associated with higher drinking intentions in the unhealthy norm/gain frame condition, but lower drinking intentions in the other conditions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Framing, social norm, funding disclosure and multiple causality manipulations as tested in this study did not exert a dark nudge effect on drinking intentions. However, the exploratory analyses suggest it could be hypothesised that the types of messages used in alcohol industry-funded responsible drinking campaigns may result in greater drinking intentions among those who identify more as heavy drinkers and less as responsible drinkers. Perceived prototype similarity may be an important moderator of the impact of alcohol health messages that warrants further research. Study 2 suggests disclosure of industry funding guides judgements of the credibility of sources of misleading messages about alcohol and cancer.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48161,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Health Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjhp.12698","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjhp.12698","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study explored how ‘dark nudges’ (tactics used in alcohol industry-funded responsible drinking campaigns) affect drinking intentions, perceived source credibility and whether individual differences in perceptions of prototypical drinkers moderated these effects.

Design

Two 2 × 2 between-groups online experimental studies.

Methods

Study 1 (N = 164) presented three alcohol health messages per condition, comprising social norm (healthy/unhealthy (“dark nudge”)) by frame (loss/gain). Study 2 (N = 229) presented one message per condition, comprising cancer causality (single cause/multiple causes (dark nudge)) by funding disclosure (disclosure/non-disclosure (dark nudge)). Outcomes were drinking intentions and perceived source credibility. Exploratory analyses considered prototype perceptions as a between-subjects moderator.

Results

No significant effects of message frame, social norm, fundi or multiple cancer causality arguments on drinking intentions were found. In Study 2, in the dark nudge multiple cancer causality conditions, perceived source credibility was high when funding was undisclosed, but significantly lower when it was disclosed. Exploratory analyses suggested effects were moderated by prototype similarity. In Study 1, higher perceived similarity to a heavy drinker and lower perceived similarity to a responsible drinker were associated with higher drinking intentions in the unhealthy norm/gain frame condition, but lower drinking intentions in the other conditions.

Conclusions

Framing, social norm, funding disclosure and multiple causality manipulations as tested in this study did not exert a dark nudge effect on drinking intentions. However, the exploratory analyses suggest it could be hypothesised that the types of messages used in alcohol industry-funded responsible drinking campaigns may result in greater drinking intentions among those who identify more as heavy drinkers and less as responsible drinkers. Perceived prototype similarity may be an important moderator of the impact of alcohol health messages that warrants further research. Study 2 suggests disclosure of industry funding guides judgements of the credibility of sources of misleading messages about alcohol and cancer.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查“暗推”对饮酒意向的影响:一项组间、随机和在线实验研究。
目的:本研究探讨了“暗推”(酒精行业资助的负责任饮酒活动中使用的策略)如何影响饮酒意图、感知来源可信度,以及典型饮酒者认知的个体差异是否会调节这些影响。设计:两个2 × 2组间在线实验研究。方法:研究1(N = 164)为每种情况提供了三条酒精健康信息,包括按帧(损失/收益)的社会规范(健康/不健康(“暗推”))。研究2(N = 229)通过资助披露(披露/非披露(暗推))呈现了每个病症一条消息,包括癌症因果关系(单原因/多原因(暗推推))。结果是饮酒意向和感知来源可信度。探索性分析将原型感知视为受试者之间的调节因素。结果:信息框架、社会规范、基金或多种癌症因果关系论点对饮酒意向无显著影响。在研究2中,在暗推多重癌症因果关系条件下,当资金未公开时,感知来源可信度较高,但当资金公开时,认知来源可信度显著较低。探索性分析表明,原型相似性调节了效应。在研究1中,在不健康的常模/增益框架条件下,与重度饮酒者的感知相似性较高,与负责任的饮酒者的认知相似性较低,与饮酒意愿较高有关,但在其他条件下,饮酒意愿较低。结论:本研究中测试的框架、社会规范、资金披露和多重因果关系操作对饮酒意向没有产生暗推效应。然而,探索性分析表明,可以假设,酒精行业资助的负责任饮酒运动中使用的信息类型可能会导致那些认为自己是重度饮酒者而不是负责任饮酒者的人有更大的饮酒意愿。感知到的原型相似性可能是酒精健康信息影响的重要调节因素,值得进一步研究。研究2表明,行业资金的披露指导了对酒精和癌症误导信息来源可信度的判断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Health Psychology
British Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
1.30%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The focus of the British Journal of Health Psychology is to publish original research on various aspects of psychology that are related to health, health-related behavior, and illness throughout a person's life. The journal specifically seeks articles that are based on health psychology theory or discuss theoretical matters within the field.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the developmental changes in and the relationship between resilience and anxiety and depression in older gastric cancer survivors: A latent growth mixture model and random intercept cross-lagged panel model analysis. Impact of childhood psoriasis on children and parents during transition to adolescence: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Factors influencing unrelated stem cell donation a mixed-methods integrated systematic review. An extension of the theory of planned behaviour to predict exclusive breastfeeding among Australian mother-father dyads using structural equation modelling. Self-compassion improves barrier self-efficacy and subsequently physical activity: A test of longitudinal mediation using a representative sample of the United Kingdom.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1