The Barriers to Universal Health Coverage in India and the Strategies to Address Them: A Key Informant Study.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Annals of Global Health Pub Date : 2023-10-09 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5334/aogh.4120
Anuska Kalita, Noah Carton-Rossen, Linju Joseph, Deepshikha Chhetri, Vikram Patel
{"title":"The Barriers to Universal Health Coverage in India and the Strategies to Address Them: A Key Informant Study.","authors":"Anuska Kalita,&nbsp;Noah Carton-Rossen,&nbsp;Linju Joseph,&nbsp;Deepshikha Chhetri,&nbsp;Vikram Patel","doi":"10.5334/aogh.4120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>India has adopted several policies toward improving access to healthcare and has been an enthusiastic signatory to several global health policies to achieve Universal Health Coverage (UHC). However, despite these policy commitments, there has been limited success in realizing these goals. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the urgent need for health system re-design and amplified the calls for such reforms.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We seek to understand the views of a diverse group of policy actors in India to address the following research questions: what are the (i) conceptualizations of UHC, (ii) main barriers to realizing UHC, and (iii) policy strategies to address these barriers.</p><p><strong>Data and methods: </strong>We collected data through in-depth interviews with 38 policy actors from diverse backgrounds and analyzed using the Framework Method to develop themes both inductively and deductively using the Control Knob Framework of health systems.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>There was congruence in the conceptualization of UHC by policy actors. Quality of care, equity, financial risk protection, and a comprehensive set of services were the most commonly cited features. The lack of a comprehensive systems approach to health policies, inadequate and inefficient health financing mechanisms, and fragmentation between public and private sectors were identified as the main barriers to UHC. Contrasting views about specific strategies, health financing, provider payments, organization of the delivery system, and regulation emerged as the key policy interventions to address these barriers.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>This is the first systematic examination of a diverse set of policy actors' problem analyses and suggestions to advance UHC goals in India. The study underscores the need to recognize the complex and interlinked nature of health system reforms and initiate a departure from path-dependent vertical interventions to bring about transformative change.</p>","PeriodicalId":48857,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Global Health","volume":"89 1","pages":"69"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10573738/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.4120","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: India has adopted several policies toward improving access to healthcare and has been an enthusiastic signatory to several global health policies to achieve Universal Health Coverage (UHC). However, despite these policy commitments, there has been limited success in realizing these goals. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the urgent need for health system re-design and amplified the calls for such reforms.

Objectives: We seek to understand the views of a diverse group of policy actors in India to address the following research questions: what are the (i) conceptualizations of UHC, (ii) main barriers to realizing UHC, and (iii) policy strategies to address these barriers.

Data and methods: We collected data through in-depth interviews with 38 policy actors from diverse backgrounds and analyzed using the Framework Method to develop themes both inductively and deductively using the Control Knob Framework of health systems.

Findings: There was congruence in the conceptualization of UHC by policy actors. Quality of care, equity, financial risk protection, and a comprehensive set of services were the most commonly cited features. The lack of a comprehensive systems approach to health policies, inadequate and inefficient health financing mechanisms, and fragmentation between public and private sectors were identified as the main barriers to UHC. Contrasting views about specific strategies, health financing, provider payments, organization of the delivery system, and regulation emerged as the key policy interventions to address these barriers.

Discussion and conclusion: This is the first systematic examination of a diverse set of policy actors' problem analyses and suggestions to advance UHC goals in India. The study underscores the need to recognize the complex and interlinked nature of health system reforms and initiate a departure from path-dependent vertical interventions to bring about transformative change.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度全民健康覆盖的障碍及其解决策略:一项重要的知情者研究。
背景:印度采取了几项旨在改善医疗服务的政策,并积极签署了几项全球卫生政策,以实现全民健康覆盖。然而,尽管作出了这些政策承诺,但在实现这些目标方面取得的成功有限。新冠肺炎大流行突出了卫生系统重新设计的迫切需要,并加大了进行此类改革的呼声。目标:我们试图了解印度不同政策参与者的观点,以解决以下研究问题:(i)全民健康保险的概念,(ii)实现全民健康保险主要障碍,以及(iii)解决这些障碍的政策策略是什么。数据和方法:我们通过对来自不同背景的38名政策参与者的深入访谈收集数据,并使用框架方法进行分析,以使用卫生系统的控制旋钮框架归纳和演绎地开发主题。研究结果:政策行动者对全民健康保险的概念化是一致的。护理质量、公平、金融风险保护和一套全面的服务是最常被提及的特征。卫生政策缺乏全面的系统方法,卫生融资机制不足且效率低下,以及公共和私营部门之间的分裂被确定为全民健康覆盖的主要障碍。关于具体战略、医疗融资、提供者支付、交付系统的组织和监管的不同观点成为解决这些障碍的关键政策干预措施。讨论和结论:这是第一次系统地审查一系列不同政策参与者的问题分析和建议,以推进印度的全民健康覆盖目标。该研究强调,需要认识到卫生系统改革的复杂性和相互关联性,并开始偏离依赖路径的垂直干预措施,以实现变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Global Health
Annals of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: ANNALS OF GLOBAL HEALTH is a peer-reviewed, open access journal focused on global health. The journal’s mission is to advance and disseminate knowledge of global health. Its goals are improve the health and well-being of all people, advance health equity and promote wise stewardship of the earth’s environment. The journal is published by the Boston College Global Public Health Program. It was founded in 1934 by the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai as the Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine. It is a partner journal of the Consortium of Universities for Global Health.
期刊最新文献
Prioritization of Surgical, Obstetric, Trauma, and Anesthesia Care in South and Southeast Asian Countries' Health Planning and Policy‑making: SOTA Care Policies in South and Southeast Asia. Association between Food Insecurity, Socioeconomic Status of the Household Head, and Hypertension and Diabetes in Maputo City. Transforming the Health Research Workforce in Mozambique: Achievements of the Mozambique Institute for Health Education and Research (MIHER) over a 13‑Year Journey. The Global, Regional, and National Burden of Tracheal, Bronchus, and Lung Cancer Caused by Smoking: An Analysis Based on the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. The Health Impacts of Air Pollution in the Context of Changing Climate in Africa: A Narrative Review with Recommendations for Action.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1