Association between baseline levels of muscular strength and risk of stroke in later life: The Cooper Center Longitudinal Study.

IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Journal of Sport and Health Science Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-13 DOI:10.1016/j.jshs.2023.10.003
Stephen W Farrell, David Leonard, Qing Li, Carolyn E Barlow, Kerem Shuval, Jarett D Berry, Andjelka Pavlovic, Laura F DeFina
{"title":"Association between baseline levels of muscular strength and risk of stroke in later life: The Cooper Center Longitudinal Study.","authors":"Stephen W Farrell, David Leonard, Qing Li, Carolyn E Barlow, Kerem Shuval, Jarett D Berry, Andjelka Pavlovic, Laura F DeFina","doi":"10.1016/j.jshs.2023.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Muscular strength is an important component of physical fitness. We evaluated the relationship between baseline muscular strength and risk of stroke among adults who were aged ≥65 years during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 7627 healthy adults (mean age = 43.9 years, 86.0% male) underwent a baseline physical examination between 1980 and 1989. Muscular strength was determined by 1-repetition maximum measures for bench press and leg press and categorized into age- and sex-specific tertiles for each measure. Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) was assessed via a maximal treadmill exercise test. Those enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare from 1999 to 2019 were included in the analyses. Associations between baseline strength and stroke outcomes were estimated using a modified Cox proportional hazards model. In a secondary analysis, we examined stroke risk by categories of CRF where Quintile 1 = low, Quintiles 2-3 = moderate, and Quintiles 4-5 = high CRF based on age and sex.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 70,072 person-years of Medicare follow-up, there were 1211 earliest indications of incident stroke. In multivariable analyses, the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval (95%CI)) for stroke across bench press categories were 1.0 (referent), 0.96 (0.83-1.11), and 0.89 (0.77-1.04), respectively (p trend = 0.14). The trend across categories of leg press was also non-significant (p trend = 0.79). Adjusted hazard ratio (95%CI) for stroke across ordered CRF categories were 1.0 (referent), 0.90 (0.71-1.13), and 0.72 (0.57-0.92) (p trend < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While meeting public health guidelines for muscular strengthening activities is likely to improve muscular strength as well as many health outcomes in older adults, performing such activities may not be helpful in preventing stroke. Conversely, meeting guidelines for aerobic activity is likely to improve CRF and lower stroke risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":48897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport and Health Science","volume":" ","pages":"642-649"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11282351/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport and Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2023.10.003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Muscular strength is an important component of physical fitness. We evaluated the relationship between baseline muscular strength and risk of stroke among adults who were aged ≥65 years during follow-up.

Methods: We included 7627 healthy adults (mean age = 43.9 years, 86.0% male) underwent a baseline physical examination between 1980 and 1989. Muscular strength was determined by 1-repetition maximum measures for bench press and leg press and categorized into age- and sex-specific tertiles for each measure. Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) was assessed via a maximal treadmill exercise test. Those enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare from 1999 to 2019 were included in the analyses. Associations between baseline strength and stroke outcomes were estimated using a modified Cox proportional hazards model. In a secondary analysis, we examined stroke risk by categories of CRF where Quintile 1 = low, Quintiles 2-3 = moderate, and Quintiles 4-5 = high CRF based on age and sex.

Results: After 70,072 person-years of Medicare follow-up, there were 1211 earliest indications of incident stroke. In multivariable analyses, the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval (95%CI)) for stroke across bench press categories were 1.0 (referent), 0.96 (0.83-1.11), and 0.89 (0.77-1.04), respectively (p trend = 0.14). The trend across categories of leg press was also non-significant (p trend = 0.79). Adjusted hazard ratio (95%CI) for stroke across ordered CRF categories were 1.0 (referent), 0.90 (0.71-1.13), and 0.72 (0.57-0.92) (p trend < 0.01).

Conclusion: While meeting public health guidelines for muscular strengthening activities is likely to improve muscular strength as well as many health outcomes in older adults, performing such activities may not be helpful in preventing stroke. Conversely, meeting guidelines for aerobic activity is likely to improve CRF and lower stroke risk.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肌肉力量基线水平与晚年中风风险之间的关系:库珀中心纵向研究。
目的:肌肉力量是身体素质的重要组成部分。在随访期间,我们评估了年龄≥65岁的成年人基线肌肉力量与中风风险之间的关系。方法:在1980年至1989年间,7627名健康成年人(平均年龄43.9岁,86.0%为男性)接受了基线体检。肌肉力量通过卧推和腿部按压的1次重复最大测量来确定,并将每项测量分为年龄和性别特异性三分位数。心肺功能(CRF)通过最大跑步机运动测试进行评估。1999年至2019年参加按服务收费医疗保险的人被纳入分析。使用改良的Cox比例风险模型估计基线强度和中风结果之间的相关性。在二次分析中,我们按照CRF的类别检查了中风风险,其中Quintile 1 = 低,昆图2-3 = 中等,昆特4-5 = 基于年龄和性别的高CRF。结果:经过70072人-年的医疗保险随访,共有1211个最早的中风迹象。在多变量分析中,卧推类别中风的危险比(HR)(95%置信区间(95%CI))分别为1.0(参考值)、0.96(0.83-1.11)和0.89(0.77-1.04)(p趋势 = 0.14)。腿部按压类别之间的趋势也不显著(p趋势 = 0.79)。在CRF分类中,中风的校正HR(95%CI)分别为1.0(参考)、0.90(0.71-1.13)和0.72(0.57-0.92)(p趋势<0.01)。结论:虽然满足肌肉强化活动的公共卫生指南可能会改善老年人的肌肉力量和许多健康结果,但进行此类活动可能无助于预防中风。相反,符合有氧运动指南可能会改善CRF并降低中风风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.30
自引率
1.70%
发文量
101
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sport and Health Science (JSHS) is an international, multidisciplinary journal that aims to advance the fields of sport, exercise, physical activity, and health sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Shanghai University of Sport, JSHS is dedicated to promoting original and impactful research, as well as topical reviews, editorials, opinions, and commentary papers. With a focus on physical and mental health, injury and disease prevention, traditional Chinese exercise, and human performance, JSHS offers a platform for scholars and researchers to share their findings and contribute to the advancement of these fields. Our journal is peer-reviewed, ensuring that all published works meet the highest academic standards. Supported by a carefully selected international editorial board, JSHS upholds impeccable integrity and provides an efficient publication platform. We invite submissions from scholars and researchers worldwide, and we are committed to disseminating insightful and influential research in the field of sport and health science.
期刊最新文献
Does ischemic preconditioning enhance sports performance more than placebo or no intervention? A systematic review with meta-analysis. Iron deficiency, supplementation, and sports performance in female athletes: A systematic review. The Youth Fitness International Test (YFIT) battery for monitoring and surveillance among children and adolescents: A modified Delphi consensus project with 169 experts from 50 countries and territories. Comment on "Accelerometer-measured physical activity, sedentary behavior, and incidence of macrovascular and microvascular events in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus and prediabetes". Aerobic exercise alleviates statin-induced PCSK9 upregulation by increasing epoxyeicosatrienoic acid levels through the FoxO3a-Sirt6 axis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1