Filtering of remote monitoring alerts transmitted by cardiac implantable electronic devices and reclassification of atrial fibrillation events by a new algorithm

IF 2.6 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiovascular digital health journal Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.08.019
Arnaud Lazarus MD , Marika Gentils MS , Stefan Klaes PhD , Issam Ibnouhsein PhD , Arnaud Rosier MD, PhD , Ghassan Moubarak MD , Jean-Luc Bonnet PhD , Jagmeet P. Singh MD, PhD, FHRS , Pascal Defaye MD, PhD
{"title":"Filtering of remote monitoring alerts transmitted by cardiac implantable electronic devices and reclassification of atrial fibrillation events by a new algorithm","authors":"Arnaud Lazarus MD ,&nbsp;Marika Gentils MS ,&nbsp;Stefan Klaes PhD ,&nbsp;Issam Ibnouhsein PhD ,&nbsp;Arnaud Rosier MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Ghassan Moubarak MD ,&nbsp;Jean-Luc Bonnet PhD ,&nbsp;Jagmeet P. Singh MD, PhD, FHRS ,&nbsp;Pascal Defaye MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.08.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are an important means of atrial fibrillation (AF) detection. However, the AF burden measurements and notifications transmitted by CIEDs are not directly related to the clinical classification of paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent AF. Moreover, AF alerts are the most frequent form of notification, imposing a time-consuming review on caregivers.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of standard AF burden-related notifications in remotely monitored (RM) patients with the incidence of events detected after filtering by a new proprietary algorithm implementing the standard European Society of Cardiology classification of AF.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Between 2017 and 2022, all RM patients with daily AF burden measurements available for ≥30 days and ≥1 AF burden-related alerts were enrolled at 68 medical centers. The incidence of CIED-transmitted alerts was compared to that of AF episodes detected by a new proprietary algorithm and classified as “first recorded episode of AF”, “paroxysmal AF”, “increased paroxysmal AF”, “persistent AF”, or “end of persistent AF back to paroxysmal AF or back to sinus rhythm.”</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Between January 2017 and September 2022, this retrospective study analyzed data from 4162 recipients of an Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, or Medtronic CIED, RM over mean follow-up of 605 ± 386 days. The algorithm broke down 67,883 AF burden-related alerts into 9728 (14.3%) clinically relevant AF events.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A new AF alert algorithm successfully identified clinically significant AF events in RM CIED recipients and would markedly limit the total number of transmitted alerts that require review by caregivers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72527,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","volume":"4 5","pages":"Pages 149-154"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/94/a9/main.PMC10577488.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666693623000683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are an important means of atrial fibrillation (AF) detection. However, the AF burden measurements and notifications transmitted by CIEDs are not directly related to the clinical classification of paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent AF. Moreover, AF alerts are the most frequent form of notification, imposing a time-consuming review on caregivers.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of standard AF burden-related notifications in remotely monitored (RM) patients with the incidence of events detected after filtering by a new proprietary algorithm implementing the standard European Society of Cardiology classification of AF.

Methods

Between 2017 and 2022, all RM patients with daily AF burden measurements available for ≥30 days and ≥1 AF burden-related alerts were enrolled at 68 medical centers. The incidence of CIED-transmitted alerts was compared to that of AF episodes detected by a new proprietary algorithm and classified as “first recorded episode of AF”, “paroxysmal AF”, “increased paroxysmal AF”, “persistent AF”, or “end of persistent AF back to paroxysmal AF or back to sinus rhythm.”

Results

Between January 2017 and September 2022, this retrospective study analyzed data from 4162 recipients of an Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, or Medtronic CIED, RM over mean follow-up of 605 ± 386 days. The algorithm broke down 67,883 AF burden-related alerts into 9728 (14.3%) clinically relevant AF events.

Conclusion

A new AF alert algorithm successfully identified clinically significant AF events in RM CIED recipients and would markedly limit the total number of transmitted alerts that require review by caregivers.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对心脏植入式电子设备传输的远程监测警报进行过滤,并通过新算法对心房颤动事件进行重新分类。
背景:心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)是检测心房颤动(AF)的重要手段。然而,CIED传输的房颤负担测量和通知与阵发性、持续性或永久性房颤的临床分类没有直接关系。此外,房颤警报是最常见的通知形式,给护理人员带来了耗时的审查。目的:本研究的目的是比较远程监测(RM)患者中标准房颤负担相关通知的发生率与通过实施欧洲心脏病学会标准房颤分类的新专有算法过滤后检测到的事件的发生率。方法:2017年至2022年间,在68个医疗中心登记了所有具有≥30天的每日AF负荷测量和≥1次AF负荷相关警报的RM患者。将CIED传输警报的发生率与一种新的专有算法检测到的AF发作的发生率进行比较,并将其分类为“首次记录的AF发作”、“阵发性AF”、“发作性AF增加”、“持续性AF”或“持续性房颤结束后回到阵发性AF或回到窦性心律”。结果:2017年1月至2022年9月,这项回顾性研究分析了4162名Abbott、Biotronic、Boston Scientific或Medtronic CIED、RM受试者的数据,平均随访605±386天。该算法将67883个AF负担相关警报分解为9728个(14.3%)临床相关AF事件。结论:一种新的房颤警报算法成功识别了RM CIED受试者中具有临床意义的房颤事件,并将显著限制需要护理人员审查的传播警报总数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular digital health journal
Cardiovascular digital health journal Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
58 days
期刊最新文献
Determinants of global cardiac implantable electrical device remote monitoring utilization – Results from an international survey Cellular-Enabled Remote Patient Monitoring for Pregnancies Complicated by Hypertension Point-of-care testing preferences 2020–2022: Trends over the years Feasibility of remote monitoring for fatal coronary heart disease using Apple Watch ECGs Artificial intelligence–based screening for cardiomyopathy in an obstetric population: A pilot study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1