Parental Experiences of Neonatal Care: A Nationwide Study on Determinants of Excellence.

Neonatology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-16 DOI:10.1159/000533900
Agnes Linnér, Ylva Thernström Blomqvist, Kristina Jonsson, Siri Lilliesköld, Mikael Norman
{"title":"Parental Experiences of Neonatal Care: A Nationwide Study on Determinants of Excellence.","authors":"Agnes Linnér, Ylva Thernström Blomqvist, Kristina Jonsson, Siri Lilliesköld, Mikael Norman","doi":"10.1159/000533900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Infant- and family-centered developmental care can reduce adverse outcomes in both infants and parents. Parents' experiences of the care and staff treatment remain to be evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Parents of infants admitted to neonatal units in Sweden from July 2020 to May 2022 responded to a questionnaire with standardized questions about in-hospital care. Exposures were hospital, gestational age, length of hospital stay, unit level, and bed density. The proportions of parents rating aspects of neonatal care as excellent, defined as five on a Likert scale, and the determinants of excellence were described. The results were benchmarked with ratings in adult somatic care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4,475/13,108 (34%) parents responded. The ratings of excellent care varied by question from 65% to 90%. The largest variation in excellence between neonatal units (range 43-80%) was found for \"participation and involvement.\" The proportion of excellence was significantly lower among parents of extremely preterm infants. Confidence in the staff was lower in parents of extremely preterm infants than in parents of term infants (56% vs. 83%). Longer hospital stays affected the experience of neonatal care adversely, whereas level of care and bed density were overall unrelated to the parental experience. Parents in neonatal care rated the care as excellent to a higher extent than patients cared for in adult medicine.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A majority of parents rated neonatal care in Sweden as excellent. The less frequent ratings of excellence among parents of extremely preterm infants indicate that more could be done to optimize parental involvement and support.</p>","PeriodicalId":94152,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":" ","pages":"46-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10836739/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000533900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Infant- and family-centered developmental care can reduce adverse outcomes in both infants and parents. Parents' experiences of the care and staff treatment remain to be evaluated.

Methods: Parents of infants admitted to neonatal units in Sweden from July 2020 to May 2022 responded to a questionnaire with standardized questions about in-hospital care. Exposures were hospital, gestational age, length of hospital stay, unit level, and bed density. The proportions of parents rating aspects of neonatal care as excellent, defined as five on a Likert scale, and the determinants of excellence were described. The results were benchmarked with ratings in adult somatic care.

Results: A total of 4,475/13,108 (34%) parents responded. The ratings of excellent care varied by question from 65% to 90%. The largest variation in excellence between neonatal units (range 43-80%) was found for "participation and involvement." The proportion of excellence was significantly lower among parents of extremely preterm infants. Confidence in the staff was lower in parents of extremely preterm infants than in parents of term infants (56% vs. 83%). Longer hospital stays affected the experience of neonatal care adversely, whereas level of care and bed density were overall unrelated to the parental experience. Parents in neonatal care rated the care as excellent to a higher extent than patients cared for in adult medicine.

Conclusion: A majority of parents rated neonatal care in Sweden as excellent. The less frequent ratings of excellence among parents of extremely preterm infants indicate that more could be done to optimize parental involvement and support.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
父母对新生儿护理的体验:一项关于优秀决定因素的全国性研究。
引言:以婴儿和家庭为中心的发展护理可以减少婴儿和父母的不良后果。父母在护理和员工待遇方面的经验还有待评估。方法:2020年7月至2022年5月,瑞典新生儿病房的婴儿父母对一份关于住院护理的标准化问题问卷进行了回答。暴露于医院、孕龄、住院时间、单位水平和床密度。描述了父母将新生儿护理方面评为优秀的比例,在Likert量表中定义为5,以及优秀的决定因素。结果以成人躯体护理的评分为基准。结果:共有4475/13108名家长(34%)作出回应。优秀护理的评分从65%到90%不等。新生儿单元之间的卓越表现差异最大(范围为43-80%)是“参与和参与”。极早产儿父母的卓越表现比例明显较低。极早产儿父母对工作人员的信心低于足月儿父母(56%对83%)。住院时间过长会对新生儿护理体验产生不利影响,而护理水平和床位密度总体上与父母的体验无关。新生儿护理的父母认为这种护理在很大程度上优于成人医学护理的患者。结论:大多数父母认为瑞典的新生儿护理非常好。极早产儿父母的优秀率较低,这表明可以做更多的工作来优化父母的参与和支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Care of Preterm and Term Newborns with Respiratory Conditions: A Systematic Synthesis of Evidence from Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Intravenous Dextrose for the Treatment of Neonatal Hypoglycaemia: A Systematic Review. Post-Asphyxial Aftercare and Management of Neonates in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Evidence Synthesis. Immediate Care for Common Conditions in Term and Preterm Neonates: The Evidence. Prevention and Treatment of Neonatal Infections in Facility and Community Settings of Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Descriptive Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1