Reporting LDL cholesterol results by clinical biochemistry laboratories in Czechia and Slovakia to improve the detection rate of familial hypercholesterolemia.

Tomáš Šálek, Vladimír Soška, Marek Budina, Marek Vecka, Veronika Šálková, Michal Vrablík
{"title":"Reporting LDL cholesterol results by clinical biochemistry laboratories in Czechia and Slovakia to improve the detection rate of familial hypercholesterolemia.","authors":"Tomáš Šálek,&nbsp;Vladimír Soška,&nbsp;Marek Budina,&nbsp;Marek Vecka,&nbsp;Veronika Šálková,&nbsp;Michal Vrablík","doi":"10.11613/BM.2023.030705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This survey aims to assess the implementation of recommendations from the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) and the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) by clinical biochemistry laboratories in Czechia and Slovakia in their policies for reporting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The web-based survey was distributed to all 383 Czech and Slovak clinical biochemistry laboratories that measure lipids by external quality assessment provider SEKK. A total of 17 single-answer questions were included. The questionnaire was focused on the detection and decision points in familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). All survey answers were taken into account. The laboratories followed the EFLM and EAS guidelines when they reported an interpretative comment considering FH diagnosis in adults.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 203 (53%) laboratories answered. Only 5% of laboratories added interpretative comments considering FH diagnosis when LDL-C concentrations are above 5.0 mmol/L in adults, and 3% of laboratories added interpretative comments considering FH diagnosis when LDL-C concentrations are above 4.0 mmol/L in children. Only 7% of laboratories reported goals for all cardiovascular risk categories (low, moderate, high, very high). Non-HDL cholesterol concentrations were calculated by 74% of responders. A significant number (51%) of participants did not measure apolipoprotein B, and 59% of laboratories did not measure lipoprotein(a).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Only a small portion of laboratories from Czechia and Slovakia reported high LDL-C results with interpretative comments considering FH diagnosis in adults, the laboratories did not follow the guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":94370,"journal":{"name":"Biochemia medica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10564150/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemia medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2023.030705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This survey aims to assess the implementation of recommendations from the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) and the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) by clinical biochemistry laboratories in Czechia and Slovakia in their policies for reporting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations.

Materials and methods: The web-based survey was distributed to all 383 Czech and Slovak clinical biochemistry laboratories that measure lipids by external quality assessment provider SEKK. A total of 17 single-answer questions were included. The questionnaire was focused on the detection and decision points in familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). All survey answers were taken into account. The laboratories followed the EFLM and EAS guidelines when they reported an interpretative comment considering FH diagnosis in adults.

Results: A total of 203 (53%) laboratories answered. Only 5% of laboratories added interpretative comments considering FH diagnosis when LDL-C concentrations are above 5.0 mmol/L in adults, and 3% of laboratories added interpretative comments considering FH diagnosis when LDL-C concentrations are above 4.0 mmol/L in children. Only 7% of laboratories reported goals for all cardiovascular risk categories (low, moderate, high, very high). Non-HDL cholesterol concentrations were calculated by 74% of responders. A significant number (51%) of participants did not measure apolipoprotein B, and 59% of laboratories did not measure lipoprotein(a).

Conclusions: Only a small portion of laboratories from Czechia and Slovakia reported high LDL-C results with interpretative comments considering FH diagnosis in adults, the laboratories did not follow the guidelines.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
捷克和斯洛伐克临床生物化学实验室报告LDL胆固醇结果,以提高家族性高胆固醇血症的检出率。
引言:本调查旨在评估捷克和斯洛伐克的临床生物化学实验室在报告低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)浓度的政策中对欧洲动脉粥样硬化学会(EAS)和欧洲临床化学与实验室医学联合会(EFLM)建议的执行情况。材料和方法:这项基于网络的调查由外部质量评估提供商SEKK分发给捷克和斯洛伐克所有383个测量脂质的临床生物化学实验室。共包括17个单项回答问题。调查问卷主要针对家族性高胆固醇血症(FH)的检测和决策要点。所有的调查答案都被考虑在内。实验室在报告考虑成人FH诊断的解释性意见时,遵循了EFLM和EAS指南。结果:共有203个(53%)实验室回答了问题。当成人LDL-C浓度高于5.0 mmol/L时,只有5%的实验室添加了考虑FH诊断的解释性意见,当儿童LDL-C水平高于4.0 mmol/L时有3%的实验室添加添加了考虑到FH诊断。只有7%的实验室报告了所有心血管风险类别(低、中、高、极高)的目标。74%的应答者计算了非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇浓度。相当多的参与者(51%)没有测量载脂蛋白B,59%的实验室没有测量脂蛋白(A)。结论:只有捷克和斯洛伐克的一小部分实验室报告了高LDL-C结果,并对成人FH诊断提出了解释性意见,实验室没有遵循指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of the color change in blue-green inclusions within neutrophils between two patients with different clinical outcomes. D-dimer assay interference detected by the discrepancy in D-dimer concentrations at different dilutions: a case report. Introducing prediction intervals for sample means. Laboratory medicine and sports: where are we now? Serum concentration of ferroportin in women of reproductive age.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1