Perspectives of people with intellectual disability about their family networks: A comparison study with key support worker proxy reports.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability Pub Date : 2022-03-01 Epub Date: 2020-10-21 DOI:10.3109/13668250.2020.1827143
Tess Tournier, Alexander H C Hendriks, Andrew Jahoda, Richard P Hastings, Sanne A H Giesbers, Petri J C M Embregts
{"title":"Perspectives of people with intellectual disability about their family networks: A comparison study with key support worker proxy reports.","authors":"Tess Tournier, Alexander H C Hendriks, Andrew Jahoda, Richard P Hastings, Sanne A H Giesbers, Petri J C M Embregts","doi":"10.3109/13668250.2020.1827143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Family Network Method - Intellectual Disability (FNM-ID) was used to compare perspectives of people with mild intellectual disability and their support workers on family networks of people with intellectual disability.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>138 participants with mild intellectual disability and support workers were interviewed, using the FNM-ID. Paired <i>t</i>-tests were used to examine differences in perspectives. Multiple regression analyses were used to examine divergence in perspectives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>People with mild intellectual disability perceived their family networks to be larger and to provide more support than support workers did. Living in a residential setting and having higher levels of externalising behaviour were associated with differences in perspectives, whereas a higher level of internalising behaviour was associated with more similar views.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individuals with intellectual disability and support workers are unlikely to provide the same information about family networks of people with mild intellectual disability. Behavioural and emotional problems were associated with divergence in perspectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":51466,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability","volume":"72 20","pages":"27-38"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2020.1827143","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Family Network Method - Intellectual Disability (FNM-ID) was used to compare perspectives of people with mild intellectual disability and their support workers on family networks of people with intellectual disability.

Method: 138 participants with mild intellectual disability and support workers were interviewed, using the FNM-ID. Paired t-tests were used to examine differences in perspectives. Multiple regression analyses were used to examine divergence in perspectives.

Results: People with mild intellectual disability perceived their family networks to be larger and to provide more support than support workers did. Living in a residential setting and having higher levels of externalising behaviour were associated with differences in perspectives, whereas a higher level of internalising behaviour was associated with more similar views.

Conclusions: Individuals with intellectual disability and support workers are unlikely to provide the same information about family networks of people with mild intellectual disability. Behavioural and emotional problems were associated with divergence in perspectives.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智障人士对其家庭网络的看法:与关键支持工作者代理报告的比较研究
摘要背景采用家庭网络方法-智障(FNM-ID)比较轻度智障人士及其支持人员对智障人士家庭网络的看法。方法采用FNM-ID量表对138名轻度智障者和支持工作者进行访谈。配对t检验用于检验观点的差异。多元回归分析被用来检验观点上的分歧。结果轻度智障人士认为他们的家庭网络比支持工作者更大,能提供更多的支持。生活在住宅环境中,具有较高水平的外化行为与观点的差异有关,而较高水平的内化行为与更相似的观点有关。结论智力障碍个体和支持工作者不太可能提供轻度智力障碍患者家庭网络的相同信息。行为和情绪问题与观点分歧有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability (formerly the Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities) is the official journal of the Australasian Society for the Study of Intellectual Disability (ASSID). JIDD is an international, multidisciplinary journal in the field of intellectual and developmental disability. The journal publishes original qualitative and quantitative research papers, literature reviews, conceptual articles, brief reports, case reports, data briefs, and opinions and perspectives.
期刊最新文献
Processing ambiguity in a social situation: A developmental and comparative study between a neurotypical population and a population with mild intellectual developmental disorder or borderline intellectual functioning. Does preservice teachers' contact with children with intellectual disabilities during their practicum impact their attitudes and teaching practices? "If you don't have the heart, you can't cope … ". Executive function is associated with behaviour problems in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy and intellectual disability. Parents' initiative in community-based support for children with intellectual and developmental disabilities: The Ahada non-profit model. 2023 JIDD Awards Announcement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1