A.-L. Poujol , A. Boissel , D. Guédon , N. Guénolé , D. Mellier , R. Scelles
{"title":"Évaluation-Cognition-Polyhandicap (ECP) : apports d’une approche qualitative dans l’élaboration et la validation d’un outil","authors":"A.-L. Poujol , A. Boissel , D. Guédon , N. Guénolé , D. Mellier , R. Scelles","doi":"10.1016/j.psfr.2020.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Setting up a personalised project for any person with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) requires an evaluation of their cognitive skills. Nevertheless an international literature review highlights: a lack of adequate tools for evaluation of the cognitive skills of people with PIMD; the need to create standardised protocols. In 2009, Scelles et al. proposed the P2CJP–Profil de Compétences Cognitives du Jeune Polyhandicapé. This tool was designed for children up to 14 years of age. In 2017, this scale has been revised and extended to the adults, and called ECP (Evaluation-Cognition-PIMD).</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>To elaborate and validate this tool, a statistical methodology has been combined with a qualitative process close to professionals and parents. The aim was to assess the relevance and the ergonomic of the ECP, the comprehension of items, the facility of use, the guideline and at least the effects regarding the practice.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The qualitative analyse of user backgrounds, at all validation stages, let adapt the ECP as well on the content as on the form. This work reveals the necessity to continue to adapt the ECP through interactions between users and searchers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44717,"journal":{"name":"Psychologie Francaise","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.psfr.2020.09.003","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychologie Francaise","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033298420300455","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Background
Setting up a personalised project for any person with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) requires an evaluation of their cognitive skills. Nevertheless an international literature review highlights: a lack of adequate tools for evaluation of the cognitive skills of people with PIMD; the need to create standardised protocols. In 2009, Scelles et al. proposed the P2CJP–Profil de Compétences Cognitives du Jeune Polyhandicapé. This tool was designed for children up to 14 years of age. In 2017, this scale has been revised and extended to the adults, and called ECP (Evaluation-Cognition-PIMD).
Method
To elaborate and validate this tool, a statistical methodology has been combined with a qualitative process close to professionals and parents. The aim was to assess the relevance and the ergonomic of the ECP, the comprehension of items, the facility of use, the guideline and at least the effects regarding the practice.
Results
The qualitative analyse of user backgrounds, at all validation stages, let adapt the ECP as well on the content as on the form. This work reveals the necessity to continue to adapt the ECP through interactions between users and searchers.
背景为任何有深度智力和多重残疾(PIMD)的人建立一个个性化的项目需要对他们的认知技能进行评估。然而,一项国际文献综述强调:缺乏适当的工具来评估PIMD患者的认知技能;需要建立标准化的协议。2009年,Scelles等人提出了p2cjp - profile comp tences Cognitives du Jeune polyhandicap。这个工具是为14岁以下的儿童设计的。2017年,该量表被修订并扩展到成人,并称为ECP(评估-认知- pimd)。方法为了详细阐述和验证该工具,统计方法与专业人员和家长的定性过程相结合。目的是评估ECP的相关性和人体工程学、对项目的理解、使用的便利、指导方针以及至少对实践的影响。结果用户背景的定性分析,在所有验证阶段,让适应ECP的内容和形式。这项工作揭示了通过用户和搜索者之间的交互继续调整ECP的必要性。
期刊介绍:
Psychologie française is the official organ of Société française de psychologie. It publishes original articles, most of the time within thematic issues. Considered as a reference publication, which covers all fields of psychology, its contents are used for tuition.