Heuristics and the Choice of Method in Entrepreneurial Marketing Education

IF 2.8 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Marketing Education Pub Date : 2023-08-07 DOI:10.1177/02734753231190886
Itzel Lopez-Castro, G. Larios-Hernández, Alberto Borbolla-Albores
{"title":"Heuristics and the Choice of Method in Entrepreneurial Marketing Education","authors":"Itzel Lopez-Castro, G. Larios-Hernández, Alberto Borbolla-Albores","doi":"10.1177/02734753231190886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article exhibits that entrepreneurial marketing educators recur to their own heuristics to deal not only with the challenges that relate to their mentees’ entrepreneurial projects, but also with the operationalization of their teaching and methodological approaches. Based on the identification of heuristics derived from a convenience sample of 20 entrepreneurship educators, this research characterizes four archetypes of educators: academics, experts, entrepreneurs-in-residence, and mentors. Findings indicate that academics refer to the most common and successful practices, whereas experts qualify methods that fulfill their purposes and follow best practices. Entrepreneurs-in-residence mirror their own startup experiences, involving a certain level of pragmatism, and mentors base their decisions on experience, choosing practices that they judge suitable. Each profile tends to replicate heuristics patterns in the selection of the education method, suggesting an impossibility to separate context and experience from the methodological choices that determine entrepreneurial marketing education, whose learning process is presented as an adapted version of the model originally proposed by Kolb for students. This article contributes to the academic discussion of the role of educators in entrepreneurial marketing, offering an exploratory explanation as to why and how different educator profiles choose their teaching and methodological approaches.","PeriodicalId":46987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marketing Education","volume":"39 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marketing Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02734753231190886","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article exhibits that entrepreneurial marketing educators recur to their own heuristics to deal not only with the challenges that relate to their mentees’ entrepreneurial projects, but also with the operationalization of their teaching and methodological approaches. Based on the identification of heuristics derived from a convenience sample of 20 entrepreneurship educators, this research characterizes four archetypes of educators: academics, experts, entrepreneurs-in-residence, and mentors. Findings indicate that academics refer to the most common and successful practices, whereas experts qualify methods that fulfill their purposes and follow best practices. Entrepreneurs-in-residence mirror their own startup experiences, involving a certain level of pragmatism, and mentors base their decisions on experience, choosing practices that they judge suitable. Each profile tends to replicate heuristics patterns in the selection of the education method, suggesting an impossibility to separate context and experience from the methodological choices that determine entrepreneurial marketing education, whose learning process is presented as an adapted version of the model originally proposed by Kolb for students. This article contributes to the academic discussion of the role of educators in entrepreneurial marketing, offering an exploratory explanation as to why and how different educator profiles choose their teaching and methodological approaches.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创业营销教育的启发式与方法选择
这篇文章展示了创业型营销教育者反复使用他们自己的启发式方法,不仅处理与他们的学员的创业项目相关的挑战,而且处理他们的教学和方法方法的可操作性。基于对20名创业教育工作者的便利样本的启发式识别,本研究确定了四种教育工作者的原型:学者、专家、常驻企业家和导师。研究结果表明,学者们参考了最常见和最成功的实践,而专家们则对满足其目的并遵循最佳实践的方法进行了鉴定。常驻企业家反映了他们自己的创业经历,涉及一定程度的实用主义,导师根据经验做出决定,选择他们认为合适的实践。在教育方法的选择中,每一个概况都倾向于复制启发式模式,这表明不可能将背景和经验与决定创业营销教育的方法选择分开,其学习过程是作为最初由Kolb为学生提出的模型的改编版本呈现的。本文对教育工作者在创业营销中的作用的学术讨论做出了贡献,对不同的教育工作者为什么以及如何选择他们的教学和方法论方法提供了探索性的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Marketing Education
Journal of Marketing Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The Journal of Marketing Education is the leading international scholarly journal devoted to contemporary issues in marketing education. Its mission is to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas, information, and experiences related to the process of educating students in marketing and its subfields. Its audience is largely composed of marketing faculty members at institutions of higher education where teaching is an integral component of their overall responsibilities. The main function of the Journal of Marketing Education is to publish articles focusing on the latest teaching/learning strategies and tactics in marketing education.
期刊最新文献
The Future of Marketing and Marketing Education Students as Value Co-Creators in the Business Education Ecosystem Embedding the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in Marketing Education The Importance of Brand Equity in the Business of Marketing Education Enhancing Legitimacy: A Pathway to Strategy Renewal of Business Schools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1