South African infrastructure condition - an opinion survey for the sAICE Infrastructure Report Card

IF 0.4 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.17159/2309-8775/2021/v63n2a5
F. C. Rust, K. Wall, M. Smit, S. Amod
{"title":"South African infrastructure condition - an opinion survey for the sAICE Infrastructure Report Card","authors":"F. C. Rust, K. Wall, M. Smit, S. Amod","doi":"10.17159/2309-8775/2021/v63n2a5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The South African Institution of Civil Engineering (SAICE) Infrastructure Report Cards of 2006, 2011 and 2017 reported that much of the South African infrastructure is in a poor condition. To augment the recent 2017 Report Card, a survey was, for the first time, conducted amongst SAICE members to obtain their opinion on the condition of infrastructure (in terms of a grading), the trend of the condition over time, as well as the reasons for the individual's grading. The 669 respondents indicated that, apart from a few exceptions such as national airports and the Gautrain, much of the infrastructure is in a poor state, which is very similar to the results obtained from the SAICE Report Card process. The results were also analysed per province and indicated that, in the opinion of respondents, specific provinces in particular are struggling with poor infrastructure. The main reasons given for the poor infrastructure were a lack of maintenance, lack of institutional capability, lack of sufficient funding and over-loading of infrastructure. Keywords: infrastructure condition, SAICE Infrastructure Report Card, Infrastructure grading system","PeriodicalId":54762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering","volume":"20 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2309-8775/2021/v63n2a5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT The South African Institution of Civil Engineering (SAICE) Infrastructure Report Cards of 2006, 2011 and 2017 reported that much of the South African infrastructure is in a poor condition. To augment the recent 2017 Report Card, a survey was, for the first time, conducted amongst SAICE members to obtain their opinion on the condition of infrastructure (in terms of a grading), the trend of the condition over time, as well as the reasons for the individual's grading. The 669 respondents indicated that, apart from a few exceptions such as national airports and the Gautrain, much of the infrastructure is in a poor state, which is very similar to the results obtained from the SAICE Report Card process. The results were also analysed per province and indicated that, in the opinion of respondents, specific provinces in particular are struggling with poor infrastructure. The main reasons given for the poor infrastructure were a lack of maintenance, lack of institutional capability, lack of sufficient funding and over-loading of infrastructure. Keywords: infrastructure condition, SAICE Infrastructure Report Card, Infrastructure grading system
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非基础设施状况-《南非基础设施报告卡》的意见调查
摘要南非土木工程学会(SAICE)2006年、2011年和2017年的基础设施报告卡显示,南非大部分基础设施状况不佳。为了补充最近的2017年成绩单,首次在SAICE成员中进行了一项调查,以获取他们对基础设施状况(就评级而言)、状况随时间的变化趋势以及个人评级的原因的意见。669名受访者表示,除了国家机场和高铁等少数例外情况外,大部分基础设施都处于较差状态,这与SAICE成绩单过程中获得的结果非常相似。还对各省的结果进行了分析,结果表明,在受访者看来,特别是特定省份的基础设施较差。基础设施薄弱的主要原因是缺乏维护、缺乏机构能力、缺乏足够的资金和基础设施负荷过重。关键词:基础设施状况,SAICE基础设施报告卡,基础设施分级系统
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering publishes peer reviewed papers on all aspects of Civil Engineering relevant to Africa. It is an open access, ISI accredited journal, providing authoritative information not only on current developments, but also – through its back issues – giving access to data on established practices and the construction of existing infrastructure. It is published quarterly and is controlled by a Journal Editorial Panel. The forerunner of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering was established in 1903 as a learned society aiming to develop technology and to share knowledge for the development of the day. The minutes of the proceedings of the then Cape Society of Civil Engineers mainly contained technical papers presented at the Society''s meetings. Since then, and throughout its long history, during which time it has undergone several name changes, the organisation has continued to publish technical papers in its monthly publication (magazine), until 1993 when it created a separate journal for the publication of technical papers.
期刊最新文献
Revised Regional Maximum Flood (RMF) method and regionalisation The status of water for firefighting in South Africa Experimental comparison of active seismic surface wave tests on shallow and deep bedrock sites Thermal performance of cavities in 3DPC building façades Design criteria for upstream raised tailings storage facilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1