Effects of weighing phase duration on vertical force-time analyses and repeatability.

IF 3.4 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Computational Chemistry Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2022-04-19 DOI:10.1080/14763141.2022.2064763
Brendan L Pinto, Jack P Callaghan
{"title":"Effects of weighing phase duration on vertical force-time analyses and repeatability.","authors":"Brendan L Pinto, Jack P Callaghan","doi":"10.1080/14763141.2022.2064763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Force plate analyses of various activities sometimes require the average (WPav) and standard deviation (WPsd) of force across the Weighing Phase (i.e., quiet period) to calculate kinetic, temporal and kinematic metrics. Yet, the influence of weighing phase duration on these analyses has been scarcely investigated. This study investigated the effects of weighing phase duration on the agreement between vertical force-time variables and the repeatability of WPav and WPsd. Durations of 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 s were compared to 2.0 s. Limits of agreement (LOA) for system weight, onset threshold, onset time, net impulse, take-off velocity and take-off displacement were calculated for 137 counter-movement, squat and single leg jumps. Repeatability coefficients for WPav and WPsd estimated the consistency between repeated trials. Shorter weighing phase durations produced small differences in WPav (LOA < ±0.25%), which accumulated during integration, affecting net impulse, take-off velocity (LOA ±2%) and take-off displacement (LOA ±23%). Differences were substantial using 5xWPsd as the onset threshold (LOA approximately ±25% to ±72%), consequently influencing onset time (LOA approximately ±6% to ±18%). WPav repeatability was high but the within-trial differences could augment with integration, requiring weighing phases longer than 2 s. WPsd had poor repeatability and its use requires further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":188,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computational Chemistry","volume":"40 11","pages":"2862-2872"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computational Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2022.2064763","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Force plate analyses of various activities sometimes require the average (WPav) and standard deviation (WPsd) of force across the Weighing Phase (i.e., quiet period) to calculate kinetic, temporal and kinematic metrics. Yet, the influence of weighing phase duration on these analyses has been scarcely investigated. This study investigated the effects of weighing phase duration on the agreement between vertical force-time variables and the repeatability of WPav and WPsd. Durations of 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 s were compared to 2.0 s. Limits of agreement (LOA) for system weight, onset threshold, onset time, net impulse, take-off velocity and take-off displacement were calculated for 137 counter-movement, squat and single leg jumps. Repeatability coefficients for WPav and WPsd estimated the consistency between repeated trials. Shorter weighing phase durations produced small differences in WPav (LOA < ±0.25%), which accumulated during integration, affecting net impulse, take-off velocity (LOA ±2%) and take-off displacement (LOA ±23%). Differences were substantial using 5xWPsd as the onset threshold (LOA approximately ±25% to ±72%), consequently influencing onset time (LOA approximately ±6% to ±18%). WPav repeatability was high but the within-trial differences could augment with integration, requiring weighing phases longer than 2 s. WPsd had poor repeatability and its use requires further investigation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
称重阶段持续时间对垂直力-时间分析和重复性的影响。
各种活动的力板分析有时需要整个称重阶段(即安静期)力的平均值(WPav)和标准差(WPsd)来计算动力学、时间和运动学指标。然而,很少有人研究称重相持续时间对这些分析的影响。本研究探讨了称重相位持续时间对垂直力-时间变量之间一致性和WPav和WPsd重复性的影响。与2.0 s相比,持续时间为0.5、1.0和1.5 s。计算了137个反动作、深蹲和单腿跳的系统重量、起跳阈值、起跳时间、净冲量、起跳速度和起跳位移的一致性极限(LOA)。WPav和WPsd的重复性系数估计了重复试验之间的一致性。较短的称重阶段持续时间导致WPav差异较小(LOA <±0.25%),在积分过程中累积,影响净冲量、起飞速度(LOA±2%)和起飞位移(LOA±23%)。以5xWPsd作为发病阈值(LOA约为±25%至±72%)差异很大,因此影响发病时间(LOA约为±6%至±18%)。WPav的重复性很高,但试验内差异会随着整合而增加,需要超过2 s的称重阶段。WPsd的可重复性较差,其使用情况有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
247
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: This distinguished journal publishes articles concerned with all aspects of computational chemistry: analytical, biological, inorganic, organic, physical, and materials. The Journal of Computational Chemistry presents original research, contemporary developments in theory and methodology, and state-of-the-art applications. Computational areas that are featured in the journal include ab initio and semiempirical quantum mechanics, density functional theory, molecular mechanics, molecular dynamics, statistical mechanics, cheminformatics, biomolecular structure prediction, molecular design, and bioinformatics.
期刊最新文献
Dual-Branch Graph Neural Network for Predicting Molecular Odors and Discovering the Relationship Between Functional Groups and Odors Infrared Spectrum and UV-Triggered Transformations of Matrix-Isolated Meta-Fluorothiophenol Supported by Ground and Excited State Theoretical Calculations Extending Chemoinformatics Techniques With JMolecular Energy: A Robust CDK-Based Force Field Library Mechanistic Study of LIDT Reduction in KH2PO4 With Yi Predicted by Density Functional Theory First Principles Global Optimization Method From Parallel Tempering Molecular Dynamics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1