Custom as a Source of Law in Louisiana

Q4 Social Sciences Louisiana Law Review Pub Date : 2018-02-26 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.3130198
Gail S. Stephenson
{"title":"Custom as a Source of Law in Louisiana","authors":"Gail S. Stephenson","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3130198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Custom is an ancient source of law that predates codified or written law. Once law began to be codified, custom filled the lacunae. Custom’s status as a source of law has declined in modern times, however, as to exist it requires a homogenous group of people with shared values who feel bound by custom’s unwritten rules. \n \nIn 1987 Louisiana amended article 1 of its Civil Code to state that Louisiana’s sources of law are legislation and custom. The comments to the article now state that custom is a primary source of law. But Louisiana courts have not decided a case based on true custom in almost a century, and Louisiana’s size and diversity make it unlikely the populace feels bound by any unwritten law. The only possible modern source of customary law in Louisiana is jurisprudence constante — repeated decisions in a long line of cases interpreting a rule of law. Legislative history, however, reveals that jurisprudence was never intended to be a primary source of law in Louisiana. \n \nThis Article briefly reviews the historical basis of consuetudinary law, examines the legislative history of the 1987 amendment to the Louisiana Civil Code, surveys Louisiana courts’ treatment of custom, and looks at custom’s present decline as authority. It concludes by suggesting that custom no longer exists as a primary source of law in Louisiana and that the Civil Code and its comments should be amended to clarify that jurisprudence constante is only a secondary, persuasive source of law.","PeriodicalId":39678,"journal":{"name":"Louisiana Law Review","volume":"40 9","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Louisiana Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3130198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Custom is an ancient source of law that predates codified or written law. Once law began to be codified, custom filled the lacunae. Custom’s status as a source of law has declined in modern times, however, as to exist it requires a homogenous group of people with shared values who feel bound by custom’s unwritten rules. In 1987 Louisiana amended article 1 of its Civil Code to state that Louisiana’s sources of law are legislation and custom. The comments to the article now state that custom is a primary source of law. But Louisiana courts have not decided a case based on true custom in almost a century, and Louisiana’s size and diversity make it unlikely the populace feels bound by any unwritten law. The only possible modern source of customary law in Louisiana is jurisprudence constante — repeated decisions in a long line of cases interpreting a rule of law. Legislative history, however, reveals that jurisprudence was never intended to be a primary source of law in Louisiana. This Article briefly reviews the historical basis of consuetudinary law, examines the legislative history of the 1987 amendment to the Louisiana Civil Code, surveys Louisiana courts’ treatment of custom, and looks at custom’s present decline as authority. It concludes by suggesting that custom no longer exists as a primary source of law in Louisiana and that the Civil Code and its comments should be amended to clarify that jurisprudence constante is only a secondary, persuasive source of law.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
习俗作为路易斯安那州法律的渊源
风俗是一种古老的法律渊源,它早于成文法或成文法。一旦法律开始编纂,习俗就填补了空白。习俗作为法律渊源的地位在现代已经下降,然而,为了生存,它需要一群具有共同价值观的人,他们感到受到习俗不成文规则的约束。1987年,路易斯安那州修改了《民法典》第一条,规定路易斯安那州的法律渊源是立法和习俗。这篇文章的评论现在表明习俗是法律的主要来源。但近一个世纪以来,路易斯安那州的法院还没有根据真正的习俗来裁决一个案件,而且路易斯安那州的面积和多样性使民众不太可能感到受到任何不成文法的约束。路易斯安那州习惯法的唯一可能的现代来源是判例常备法——在解释法律规则的一长串案件中反复作出的裁决。然而,立法史表明,法学从未打算成为路易斯安那州法律的主要来源。本文简要回顾了习惯法的历史基础,考察了1987年路易斯安那州民法典修正案的立法历史,调查了路易斯安那州法院对习俗的处理,并着眼于目前习俗作为权威的衰落。它的结论是,习惯法不再作为路易斯安那州的主要法律渊源而存在,《民法典》及其评注应予以修订,以澄清常见法只是一种次要的、具有说服力的法律渊源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Louisiana Law Review
Louisiana Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The first issue of the Louisiana Law Review went into print in November of 1938. Since then the Review has served as Louisiana"s flagship legal journal and has become a vibrant forum for scholarship in comparative and civil law topics. The article below is taken from the first issue of the Law Review. The piece was meant to commemorate the founding of the Law Review and to foreshadow the lasting impact that the Louisiana Law Review would have on state jurisprudence and legislation and on the legal landscape of Louisiana for years to come.
期刊最新文献
Towards a New Archimedean Point for Maternal vs. Fetal Rights? A Louisiana Theory of Juridical Acts States’ Rights to Protect Gun-Owning Patients from Politicized Physician Speech Custom as a Source of Law in Louisiana A Tribute to Thanassi: The Influence of Justinian on American Common Law Property
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1