The effect of different marshalling forms on the aerodynamic performance of the freight train under crosswind

Q2 Engineering Archives of Transport Pub Date : 2021-09-30 DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0015.0093
Zihao Xie, Wu Zhenfeng, L. Zhu, Wangcai Ding
{"title":"The effect of different marshalling forms on the aerodynamic performance of the freight train under crosswind","authors":"Zihao Xie, Wu Zhenfeng, L. Zhu, Wangcai Ding","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.0093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Different types and quantities of freight cars will affect the marshalling forms of freight trains. In order to investigate the influence of the marshalling forms on the aerodynamic performance of freight trains under crosswind, three types of freight cars such as box cars, gondola cars and tank cars, were selected to marshal with locomotives. This paper used Detached Eddy Simulation method (DES) based on the SST k − ω turbulent model to simulate the aerodynamic performance of the freight train under crosswind. The wind speed, wind angle and train running speed were set as 25m/s, 45° and 100km/h respectively. The influence of different marshalling forms on the aerodynamic performance of the freight train such as aerodynamic drag and lateral force were calculated and compared. The results showed that the marshalling forms have significant effect on the aerodynamic drag and the maximum difference of the aerodynamic drag can reach 20.5%. Furthermore, the variations of the lateral force of the whole train and the locomotive are not apparent. The maximum difference is only 4.3% and 4.1% respectively. However, the changes of marshalling forms have obvious influence on the lateral force of each carriage. The maximum difference of the lateral force of the box car, gondola car and tank car is 17%, 20.1% and 24.1% respectively. The essential reason why the marshalling forms has a significant impact on the aerodynamic performance of the freight train is that there are obvious differences in the volume and shape structure of each railway carriage. The large volume of box cars and the cavity structure of gondola cars make their position a key factor affecting the aerodynamic performance of freight trains. Among the six different marshalling forms selected in this paper, the best marshalling form is: locomotive--gondola car--box car--tank car. Both the aerodynamic drag of the train and the lateral force of the boxcar are the smallest by taking this marshalling form.","PeriodicalId":53541,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Transport","volume":"32 7","pages":"57-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Transport","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.0093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Different types and quantities of freight cars will affect the marshalling forms of freight trains. In order to investigate the influence of the marshalling forms on the aerodynamic performance of freight trains under crosswind, three types of freight cars such as box cars, gondola cars and tank cars, were selected to marshal with locomotives. This paper used Detached Eddy Simulation method (DES) based on the SST k − ω turbulent model to simulate the aerodynamic performance of the freight train under crosswind. The wind speed, wind angle and train running speed were set as 25m/s, 45° and 100km/h respectively. The influence of different marshalling forms on the aerodynamic performance of the freight train such as aerodynamic drag and lateral force were calculated and compared. The results showed that the marshalling forms have significant effect on the aerodynamic drag and the maximum difference of the aerodynamic drag can reach 20.5%. Furthermore, the variations of the lateral force of the whole train and the locomotive are not apparent. The maximum difference is only 4.3% and 4.1% respectively. However, the changes of marshalling forms have obvious influence on the lateral force of each carriage. The maximum difference of the lateral force of the box car, gondola car and tank car is 17%, 20.1% and 24.1% respectively. The essential reason why the marshalling forms has a significant impact on the aerodynamic performance of the freight train is that there are obvious differences in the volume and shape structure of each railway carriage. The large volume of box cars and the cavity structure of gondola cars make their position a key factor affecting the aerodynamic performance of freight trains. Among the six different marshalling forms selected in this paper, the best marshalling form is: locomotive--gondola car--box car--tank car. Both the aerodynamic drag of the train and the lateral force of the boxcar are the smallest by taking this marshalling form.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
侧风作用下不同编组形式对货运列车气动性能的影响
不同类型和数量的货车会影响货运列车的编组形式。为了研究侧风条件下编组形式对货运列车空气动力学性能的影响,选择箱式车、吊舱车和罐车三种货车与机车编组。本文采用基于SST k−ω湍流模型的分离涡模拟方法(DES)模拟了侧风作用下货运列车的气动性能。风速、风向角和列车运行速度分别设定为25m/s、45°和100km/h。计算比较了不同编组形式对货车气动阻力、侧向力等气动性能的影响。结果表明,编组形式对气动阻力有显著影响,气动阻力最大差值可达20.5%,且整车和机车横向力变化不明显。最大差值分别只有4.3%和4.1%。然而,编组形式的变化对每节车厢的侧向力有明显的影响。箱车、吊舱和罐车的侧向力最大差值分别为17%、20.1%和24.1%。编组形式对货运列车空气动力学性能产生重大影响的根本原因是,每节车厢的体积和形状结构存在明显差异。箱式车厢体积大,吊舱车厢的空腔结构使其位置成为影响货运列车空气动力学性能的关键因素。在本文选择的六种不同编组形式中,最佳编组形式为:机车—吊舱—箱式—罐车。采用这种编组形式,列车的气动阻力和棚车的侧向力都是最小的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Transport
Archives of Transport Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Proactive safety assessment of urban through-roads based on GPS data The Multidimensional Threats of Unmanned Aerial Systems: Exploring Biomechanical, Technical, Operational, and Legal Solutions for Ensuring Safety and Security Predicting severe wildlife vehicle crashes (WVCs) on New Hampshire roads using a hybrid generalized additive model Research on port AGV trajectory tracking control based on improved fuzzy sliding mode control Suitable law-based location selection of high-power electric vehicles charging stations on the TEN-T core network for sustainability: a case of Poland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1