Alok A. Khorana , Charles W. Francis , Nicole M. Kuderer , Marc Carrier , Thomas L. Ortel , Ted Wun , Deborah Rubens , Susan Hobbs , Renuka Iyer , Derick Peterson , Andrea Baran , Katherine Kaproth-Joslin , Gary H. Lyman
{"title":"Dalteparin thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients at high risk for venous thromboembolism: A randomized trial","authors":"Alok A. Khorana , Charles W. Francis , Nicole M. Kuderer , Marc Carrier , Thomas L. Ortel , Ted Wun , Deborah Rubens , Susan Hobbs , Renuka Iyer , Derick Peterson , Andrea Baran , Katherine Kaproth-Joslin , Gary H. Lyman","doi":"10.1016/j.thromres.2017.01.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span><span>Ambulatory cancer patients at high-risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) can be identified using a validated risk score (Khorana score). We evaluated the benefit of outpatient </span>thromboprophylaxis with </span>dalteparin in high-risk patients in a multicenter randomized study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Cancer patients with Khorana score<!--> <!-->≥<!--> <!-->3 starting a new systemic regimen were screened for VTE and if negative randomized to dalteparin 5000<!--> <!-->units daily or observation for 12<!--> <!-->weeks. Subjects were screened with lower extremity ultrasounds every 4<!--> <!-->weeks on study and with chest CT at 12<!--> <!-->weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was all VTE over 12<!--> <!-->weeks and primary safety endpoint was clinically relevant bleeding events over 13<!--> <!-->weeks. The study was terminated early due to low accrual.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 117 enrolled patients, 10 (8.5%) had VTE on baseline screening and were not randomized. Of 98 randomized patients, VTE occurred in 12% (N<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->6/50) of patients on dalteparin and 21% (N<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->10/48) on observation (hazard ratio, HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.23–1.89). Major bleeding was similar (N<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1) in each arm but clinically relevant bleeding was higher in dalteparin arm (N<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->7 versus 1 on observation) (HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->7.0, 95% CI 1.2–131.6). There was no difference in overall survival.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Thromboprophylaxis is associated with a non-significantly reduced risk of VTE and significantly increased risk of clinically relevant bleeding in this underpowered study. The Khorana score successfully identifies patients with high incidence of VTE both at baseline and during treatment. Future studies should continue to focus on risk-adapted approaches to reduce the burden of VTE in cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><p><span>clinicaltrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg> identifier: <span>NCT00876915</span><svg><path></path></svg></p></div>","PeriodicalId":23064,"journal":{"name":"Thrombosis research","volume":"151 ","pages":"Pages 89-95"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.thromres.2017.01.009","citationCount":"112","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thrombosis research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049384817300208","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 112
Abstract
Background
Ambulatory cancer patients at high-risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) can be identified using a validated risk score (Khorana score). We evaluated the benefit of outpatient thromboprophylaxis with dalteparin in high-risk patients in a multicenter randomized study.
Methods
Cancer patients with Khorana score ≥ 3 starting a new systemic regimen were screened for VTE and if negative randomized to dalteparin 5000 units daily or observation for 12 weeks. Subjects were screened with lower extremity ultrasounds every 4 weeks on study and with chest CT at 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was all VTE over 12 weeks and primary safety endpoint was clinically relevant bleeding events over 13 weeks. The study was terminated early due to low accrual.
Results
Of 117 enrolled patients, 10 (8.5%) had VTE on baseline screening and were not randomized. Of 98 randomized patients, VTE occurred in 12% (N = 6/50) of patients on dalteparin and 21% (N = 10/48) on observation (hazard ratio, HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.23–1.89). Major bleeding was similar (N = 1) in each arm but clinically relevant bleeding was higher in dalteparin arm (N = 7 versus 1 on observation) (HR = 7.0, 95% CI 1.2–131.6). There was no difference in overall survival.
Conclusions
Thromboprophylaxis is associated with a non-significantly reduced risk of VTE and significantly increased risk of clinically relevant bleeding in this underpowered study. The Khorana score successfully identifies patients with high incidence of VTE both at baseline and during treatment. Future studies should continue to focus on risk-adapted approaches to reduce the burden of VTE in cancer.
期刊介绍:
Thrombosis Research is an international journal dedicated to the swift dissemination of new information on thrombosis, hemostasis, and vascular biology, aimed at advancing both science and clinical care. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original research, reviews, editorials, opinions, and critiques, covering both basic and clinical studies. Priority is given to research that promises novel approaches in the diagnosis, therapy, prognosis, and prevention of thrombotic and hemorrhagic diseases.