Forage diversity and fertiliser adoption in Napier grass production among smallholder dairy farmers in Kenya

D. Njarui, M. Gatheru, J. Ndubi, A. Gichangi, A. Murage
{"title":"Forage diversity and fertiliser adoption in Napier grass production among smallholder dairy farmers in Kenya","authors":"D. Njarui, M. Gatheru, J. Ndubi, A. Gichangi, A. Murage","doi":"10.17170/KOBRA-202110274962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Feed scarcity is one of the major challenges affecting smallholder dairy production in Kenya. Forages are the foundation of livestock nutritional requirements; forage diversification and fertiliser are intensification options that can increase productivity. A sample of 316 and 313 smallholder farmers were surveyed in eastern midlands and central highlands of Kenya, respectively, to establish the types of forages cultivated and the factors that influence fertiliser adoption in Napier grass ( Cenchrus purpureus Schumach.) production. Independent t -tests were applied to compare the effect of continuous variables on social economic and institutional characteristics between adopters and non-adopters on fertiliser and area allocated to different forages. Chi-square tests were used to compare nominal variables for the proportion of farmers growing different forages, criteria they consider in selection of suitable forages, and social economic and institutional characteristics of adopters and non-adopters of fertiliser. Binary logistic regression was used to determine factors that influence fertiliser adoption. The study revealed that forage diversification was low with Napier grass being the only forage cultivated by most farmers (~90%). Urochloa ( Urochloa spp ), Rhodes grass ( Chloris gayana Kunth.) and Guinea grass ( Megathyrsus maximus Jaq.) were cultivated by less than 11% of farmers. The fertiliser adoption rate was high (77%) and was influenced by gender of household head, membership of groups, access to extension services and labour. Future research should focus on promoting of forage diversification and investigate quantity and fertiliser application regimes in order to enable development of appropriate advisory services.","PeriodicalId":54889,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics","volume":"33 3","pages":"245-256"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17170/KOBRA-202110274962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Feed scarcity is one of the major challenges affecting smallholder dairy production in Kenya. Forages are the foundation of livestock nutritional requirements; forage diversification and fertiliser are intensification options that can increase productivity. A sample of 316 and 313 smallholder farmers were surveyed in eastern midlands and central highlands of Kenya, respectively, to establish the types of forages cultivated and the factors that influence fertiliser adoption in Napier grass ( Cenchrus purpureus Schumach.) production. Independent t -tests were applied to compare the effect of continuous variables on social economic and institutional characteristics between adopters and non-adopters on fertiliser and area allocated to different forages. Chi-square tests were used to compare nominal variables for the proportion of farmers growing different forages, criteria they consider in selection of suitable forages, and social economic and institutional characteristics of adopters and non-adopters of fertiliser. Binary logistic regression was used to determine factors that influence fertiliser adoption. The study revealed that forage diversification was low with Napier grass being the only forage cultivated by most farmers (~90%). Urochloa ( Urochloa spp ), Rhodes grass ( Chloris gayana Kunth.) and Guinea grass ( Megathyrsus maximus Jaq.) were cultivated by less than 11% of farmers. The fertiliser adoption rate was high (77%) and was influenced by gender of household head, membership of groups, access to extension services and labour. Future research should focus on promoting of forage diversification and investigate quantity and fertiliser application regimes in order to enable development of appropriate advisory services.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肯尼亚小农奶牛场纳皮尔草生产中的饲料多样性和肥料采用
饲料短缺是影响肯尼亚小农户乳制品生产的主要挑战之一。饲料是牲畜营养需求的基础;饲料多样化和施肥是可以提高生产力的集约化选择。分别对肯尼亚中部东部和中部高地的316名和313名小农户进行了调查,以确定种植的牧草类型以及影响纳皮尔草(Cenchrus purpureus Schumach)生产中肥料采用的因素。采用独立的t检验来比较连续变量对采用者和非采用者之间的社会经济和制度特征对肥料和分配给不同牧草的面积的影响。卡方检验用于比较种植不同牧草的农民比例的名义变量、他们在选择合适牧草时考虑的标准,以及化肥采用者和非采用者的社会经济和制度特征。二元逻辑回归用于确定影响肥料采用的因素。研究表明,牧草多样化程度较低,纳皮尔草是大多数农民种植的唯一牧草(约90%)。只有不到11%的农民种植了Urochloa、Rhodes草(Chloris gayana Kunth.)和几内亚草(Megathyrsus maximus Jaq.)。化肥采用率很高(77%),受户主性别、团体成员、获得推广服务和劳动力的影响。未来的研究应侧重于促进饲料多样化,并调查数量和化肥施用制度,以便能够开发适当的咨询服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics publishes papers dealing with original research and review papers in the fields of plant production, animal nutrition and animal husbandry, soil science, rural economy and farm management, forestry and forest economy, veterinary hygiene and protection against epidemics.
期刊最新文献
Danny Santa Fe Forage diversity and fertiliser adoption in Napier grass production among smallholder dairy farmers in Kenya Drivers of adaptation to climate change in vulnerable farming communities: a micro analysis of rice farmers in Ndop, Cameroon Genotypic differences in body weight and physiological response of local and exotic turkeys challenged with Salmonella typhimurium
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1