Safety and Efficacy of Interferon β-1b in the Treatment of Severe COVID-19 Patients: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial

IF 0.5 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Archives of Clinical Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2022-11-02 DOI:10.5812/archcid-120066
Javad Moazen, Leila Masoudiyekta, A. Kassani, Seifollah Mohseni, Nastaran Mirsamiyazdi, Mahnaz Nosratabadi, Shahzad Mehranfard, hojat Rezaei-Bayatiyani7
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Interferon β-1b in the Treatment of Severe COVID-19 Patients: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Javad Moazen, Leila Masoudiyekta, A. Kassani, Seifollah Mohseni, Nastaran Mirsamiyazdi, Mahnaz Nosratabadi, Shahzad Mehranfard, hojat Rezaei-Bayatiyani7","doi":"10.5812/archcid-120066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: About a year after the start of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the results of the studies conducted to investigate the effectiveness of interferon (INF) compounds in this disease were contradictory. Objectives: This study was carried out to examine the safety and efficacy of a treatment protocol containing INF-β-1b, hydroxychloroquine, and Kaletra (lopinavir/ritonavir) in patients with severe COVID-19. Methods: In this open-label, randomized controlled trial, severe cases of COVID-19 were included. Patients were eligible if they had epidemiological and radiological evidence compatible with COVID-19 or a positive polymerase chain reaction result and their disease was severe. They were randomly allocated into a control group that received the standard regimen (hydroxychloroquine and Kaletra) and an intervention group that received INF-β-1b treatment and the standard treatment regimen. Then, the two groups were compared in terms of in-hospital mortality, intubation, length of hospital stay, oxygen saturation, and lactate dehydrogenase before and after the intervention. Results: A total of 91 cases of severe COVID-19 were enrolled for analysis [intervention (n = 47) and control (n = 44)]. The length of hospital stay in the intervention group was significantly longer than in the control group (13.21 ± 6.88 vs. 10.52 ± 5.77 days; P = 0.047). The mortality rate did not significantly differ between the intervention and control groups (19.15% and 13.64%, respectively; P = 0.509). The intubation rate did not significantly differ between the intervention and control groups (12.76% and 11.36%, respectively; P = 0.838). Conclusions: The use of INF-β-1b-containing treatment regimens does not reduce mortality and intubation rates among patients with severe COVID-19. Furthermore, it might even increase the severity of the disease and the length of hospital stay for some patients; therefore, it is not recommended to use INF-β-1b in severe cases of COVID-19.","PeriodicalId":51793,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Clinical Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/archcid-120066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: About a year after the start of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the results of the studies conducted to investigate the effectiveness of interferon (INF) compounds in this disease were contradictory. Objectives: This study was carried out to examine the safety and efficacy of a treatment protocol containing INF-β-1b, hydroxychloroquine, and Kaletra (lopinavir/ritonavir) in patients with severe COVID-19. Methods: In this open-label, randomized controlled trial, severe cases of COVID-19 were included. Patients were eligible if they had epidemiological and radiological evidence compatible with COVID-19 or a positive polymerase chain reaction result and their disease was severe. They were randomly allocated into a control group that received the standard regimen (hydroxychloroquine and Kaletra) and an intervention group that received INF-β-1b treatment and the standard treatment regimen. Then, the two groups were compared in terms of in-hospital mortality, intubation, length of hospital stay, oxygen saturation, and lactate dehydrogenase before and after the intervention. Results: A total of 91 cases of severe COVID-19 were enrolled for analysis [intervention (n = 47) and control (n = 44)]. The length of hospital stay in the intervention group was significantly longer than in the control group (13.21 ± 6.88 vs. 10.52 ± 5.77 days; P = 0.047). The mortality rate did not significantly differ between the intervention and control groups (19.15% and 13.64%, respectively; P = 0.509). The intubation rate did not significantly differ between the intervention and control groups (12.76% and 11.36%, respectively; P = 0.838). Conclusions: The use of INF-β-1b-containing treatment regimens does not reduce mortality and intubation rates among patients with severe COVID-19. Furthermore, it might even increase the severity of the disease and the length of hospital stay for some patients; therefore, it is not recommended to use INF-β-1b in severe cases of COVID-19.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
干扰素β-1b治疗重症新冠肺炎患者的安全性和有效性:一项开放标签随机对照试验
背景:在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行开始约一年后,研究干扰素(INF)化合物在该疾病中的有效性的研究结果相互矛盾。目的:本研究旨在探讨含有INF-β-1b、羟氯喹和Kaletra(洛匹那韦/利托那韦)的治疗方案对重症COVID-19患者的安全性和有效性。方法:采用开放标签、随机对照试验,纳入重症COVID-19病例。具有与COVID-19相符的流行病学和放射学证据或聚合酶链反应阳性且病情严重的患者均符合入选条件。他们被随机分为对照组和干预组,对照组接受标准治疗方案(羟氯喹和Kaletra),干预组接受INF-β-1b治疗和标准治疗方案。然后比较两组患者干预前后的住院死亡率、插管率、住院时间、血氧饱和度、乳酸脱氢酶等指标。结果:共纳入91例重症COVID-19病例进行分析[干预组(n = 47)和对照组(n = 44)]。干预组住院时间明显长于对照组(13.21±6.88∶10.52±5.77);P = 0.047)。干预组和对照组的死亡率差异无统计学意义(分别为19.15%和13.64%);P = 0.509)。干预组与对照组插管率差异无统计学意义(分别为12.76%和11.36%);P = 0.838)。结论:使用含有INF-β-1b的治疗方案并不能降低重症COVID-19患者的死亡率和插管率。此外,它甚至可能增加疾病的严重程度和一些患者的住院时间;因此,在COVID-19重症病例中不建议使用INF-β-1b。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Archives of Clinical Infectious Diseases is a peer-reviewed multi-disciplinary medical publication, scheduled to appear quarterly serving as a means for scientific information exchange in the international medical forum. The journal particularly welcomes contributions relevant to the Middle-East region and publishes biomedical experiences and clinical investigations on prevalent infectious diseases in the region as well as analysis of factors that may modulate the incidence, course, and management of infectious diseases and pertinent medical problems in the Middle East.
期刊最新文献
Comparable Antibacterial Effects of Silver and Iron Oxide Nanoparticles on Urinary Calculi Obtained After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Prevalence of Campylobacter Species, Helicobacter Pylori, Human Papillomavirus, and JC Polyomavirus in Patients with Colorectal Cancer in Iran Antimicrobial Resistance as Global Emergency Action Plan Epidemiology of Febrile Neutropenic and Bacteremic Patients in the Extensively Drug-Resistant Era Top 10 Infectious Diseases Articles in 2023
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1