{"title":"Expanding beyond World War II to encourage peace education and deconstruct militarism","authors":"W. McCorkle","doi":"10.1080/17400201.2021.1937086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How individuals interpret the justifications for historical war can have a large effect on how they see modern warfare (McCorkle, W. 2017; Harris 2008). In the social studies classroom, particularly in the U.S. context, so much of what educators focus on in regard to war are the events of World War II. This focus on the Second World War is understandable. However, it could also be dangerous in our pursuit of more peaceful and diplomatic solutions in the world today as it creates a narrative that war is justified, necessary, and a path towards a more just world. In the social studies classroom, educators should move the frame of war outside of the purview of World War II, as World War II in many ways is the anomaly of U.S. conflicts. If we can do this in the history course, we may be able to show students the times when war is often futile and counterproductive. We can use the frameworks of war such as the American Revolution, the War of 1812, the Mexican-American War, World War I, Vietnam, and the more recent wars in Afghanistan and Iraq to show how war is typically hostile to the goals of a more just and secure world.","PeriodicalId":44502,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Peace Education","volume":"71 21","pages":"239 - 259"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17400201.2021.1937086","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Peace Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17400201.2021.1937086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
How individuals interpret the justifications for historical war can have a large effect on how they see modern warfare (McCorkle, W. 2017; Harris 2008). In the social studies classroom, particularly in the U.S. context, so much of what educators focus on in regard to war are the events of World War II. This focus on the Second World War is understandable. However, it could also be dangerous in our pursuit of more peaceful and diplomatic solutions in the world today as it creates a narrative that war is justified, necessary, and a path towards a more just world. In the social studies classroom, educators should move the frame of war outside of the purview of World War II, as World War II in many ways is the anomaly of U.S. conflicts. If we can do this in the history course, we may be able to show students the times when war is often futile and counterproductive. We can use the frameworks of war such as the American Revolution, the War of 1812, the Mexican-American War, World War I, Vietnam, and the more recent wars in Afghanistan and Iraq to show how war is typically hostile to the goals of a more just and secure world.
个人如何解释历史战争的理由会对他们如何看待现代战争产生很大影响(McCorkle, W. 2017;哈里斯2008)。在社会研究的课堂上,尤其是在美国的背景下,教育工作者关注的关于战争的很多内容都是第二次世界大战的事件。这种对第二次世界大战的关注是可以理解的。然而,它也可能是危险的,因为它创造了一种叙事,即战争是正当的、必要的,是通往更公正世界的道路。在社会研究课堂上,教育者应该把战争的框架移出二战的范围,因为二战在很多方面都是美国冲突的反常现象。如果我们能在历史课上做到这一点,我们也许能够向学生展示战争往往是徒劳和适得其反的时代。我们可以用战争的框架,如美国独立战争、1812年战争、美墨战争、第一次世界大战、越南战争,以及最近的阿富汗和伊拉克战争,来说明战争通常是如何与建立一个更公正、更安全的世界的目标相抵触的。