Affective alignment and epistemic polarization: the case of feminist research in the neoliberalized university

IF 2 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Gender and Education Pub Date : 2023-05-22 DOI:10.1080/09540253.2023.2215067
Rebecca W. B. Lund
{"title":"Affective alignment and epistemic polarization: the case of feminist research in the neoliberalized university","authors":"Rebecca W. B. Lund","doi":"10.1080/09540253.2023.2215067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article explores affective alignment and epistemic polarization in the field of feminist research, resulting from the neoliberalization of the universities and a performance-oriented research economy. Previous research has described and analysed the ‘epistemic splitting’ that feminist scholars engage in to live up to standardized performance measures and be perceived as ‘proper knowers’ in the neoliberalized university. This article is based on data from 26 interviews with feminist academics, presented as 5 composites, that let us in on their practices and socially organized experiences within the neoliberalized academy. I draw on Sarah Ahmed’s theory of affective alignments to analyse how practices of epistemic splitting are affectively instigated and impelled.","PeriodicalId":12486,"journal":{"name":"Gender and Education","volume":"68 11","pages":"437 - 453"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender and Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2023.2215067","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article explores affective alignment and epistemic polarization in the field of feminist research, resulting from the neoliberalization of the universities and a performance-oriented research economy. Previous research has described and analysed the ‘epistemic splitting’ that feminist scholars engage in to live up to standardized performance measures and be perceived as ‘proper knowers’ in the neoliberalized university. This article is based on data from 26 interviews with feminist academics, presented as 5 composites, that let us in on their practices and socially organized experiences within the neoliberalized academy. I draw on Sarah Ahmed’s theory of affective alignments to analyse how practices of epistemic splitting are affectively instigated and impelled.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
情感取向与认识极化——以新自由主义大学女性主义研究为例
摘要本文探讨了大学新自由化和绩效导向的研究经济导致的女性主义研究领域的情感一致和认识两极分化。先前的研究描述和分析了女权主义学者在新自由主义大学中为达到标准化的绩效指标并被视为“合适的知者”而进行的“认识分裂”。本文基于对女权主义学者的26次采访的数据,以5种复合形式呈现,让我们了解她们在新自由主义学院中的实践和社会组织经历。我借鉴莎拉·艾哈迈德的情感结盟理论来分析认知分裂的实践是如何被情感煽动和推动的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gender and Education
Gender and Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Gender and Education grew out of feminist politics and a social justice agenda and is committed to developing multi-disciplinary and critical discussions of gender and education. The journal is particularly interested in the place of gender in relation to other key differences and seeks to further feminist knowledge, philosophies, theory, action and debate. The Editors are actively committed to making the journal an interactive platform that includes global perspectives on education, gender and culture. Submissions to the journal should examine and theorize the interrelated experiences of gendered subjects including women, girls, men, boys, and gender-diverse individuals. Papers should consider how gender shapes and is shaped by other social, cultural, discursive, affective and material dimensions of difference. Gender and Education expects articles to engage in feminist debate, to draw upon a range of theoretical frameworks and to go beyond simple descriptions. Education is interpreted in a broad sense to cover both formal and informal aspects, including pre-school, primary, and secondary education; families and youth cultures inside and outside schools; adult, community, further and higher education; vocational education and training; media education; and parental education.
期刊最新文献
‘Day-dreaming’ school climate: a slow critical feminist post-humanist c/art/ographic listening to how school feels Collaboratively reimagining higher education: enacting posthuman feminist practices Intersectional cognitive schemas of diversity and inclusion in higher education ‘They trusted me, even if I’m a tom like this’: exploring sexual-professional identity communication of LGBTQ+ primary schoolteachers Artistic mutilation of genitalia: an interpretive analysis of representations of genitalia in Indian school science textbooks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1