Instruments for the assessment of SuperAgers: A systematic review

Gabriel Sousa Andrade, Pedro Fernando Wiezel, Amer Cavalheiro Hamdan
{"title":"Instruments for the assessment of SuperAgers: A systematic review","authors":"Gabriel Sousa Andrade,&nbsp;Pedro Fernando Wiezel,&nbsp;Amer Cavalheiro Hamdan","doi":"10.1016/j.ahr.2023.100156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Age-related cortical atrophy and cognitive decline, especially in memory function, are common among older adults. However, a subset of older adults, known as SuperAgers (SA), exhibit exceptional resilience to these effects, displaying an episodic memory capacity equivalent to or exceeding that of individuals 20 to 30 years their junior. Despite this phenomenon, there is no consensus among researchers regarding the most appropriate instruments and criteria for classifying SuperAgers. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic review of the literature to determine which instruments and classification criteria are most frequently utilized. Our search of PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and PsycINFO yielded results suggesting that SuperAgers are generally defined as individuals aged 80 years or older, with anterograde memory tests based on fixed cut-off values for word list recall, as well as executive functioning tests, serving as the primary classification tools. Given the influence of sociocultural and linguistic factors, as well as differences in the choice of memory tests, it is not recommended to establish a single cut-point in global SA studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72129,"journal":{"name":"Aging and health research","volume":"3 3","pages":"Article 100156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging and health research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667032123000409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Age-related cortical atrophy and cognitive decline, especially in memory function, are common among older adults. However, a subset of older adults, known as SuperAgers (SA), exhibit exceptional resilience to these effects, displaying an episodic memory capacity equivalent to or exceeding that of individuals 20 to 30 years their junior. Despite this phenomenon, there is no consensus among researchers regarding the most appropriate instruments and criteria for classifying SuperAgers. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic review of the literature to determine which instruments and classification criteria are most frequently utilized. Our search of PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and PsycINFO yielded results suggesting that SuperAgers are generally defined as individuals aged 80 years or older, with anterograde memory tests based on fixed cut-off values for word list recall, as well as executive functioning tests, serving as the primary classification tools. Given the influence of sociocultural and linguistic factors, as well as differences in the choice of memory tests, it is not recommended to establish a single cut-point in global SA studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估超级老人的工具:系统回顾
与年龄相关的皮质萎缩和认知能力下降,尤其是记忆功能下降,在老年人中很常见。然而,有一部分老年人,被称为“超级老人”(superager, SA),对这些影响表现出了非凡的适应能力,他们的情景记忆能力相当于或超过了比他们小20到30岁的人。尽管有这种现象,研究者们对于最合适的工具和标准来分类超级老人还没有达成共识。为了解决这一差距,我们对文献进行了系统的回顾,以确定最常用的工具和分类标准。我们对PubMed/Medline、Scopus、Web of Science和PsycINFO的搜索结果表明,超级老人通常被定义为年龄在80岁或以上的个体,使用基于固定临界值的顺行记忆测试来回忆单词列表,以及执行功能测试,作为主要的分类工具。考虑到社会文化和语言因素的影响,以及记忆测试选择的差异,不建议在全球SA研究中建立单一的切入点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aging and health research
Aging and health research Clinical Neurology, Public Health and Health Policy, Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Interventions of cognitive impairment in older adults: A comprehensive review Evaluation of Minds in Motion, a fitness program for people living with dementia and their caregivers Premorbid and current intellectual performance reflects different backgrounds in patients with Parkinson's disease Baseline shock index and baroreflex function in older adults The deprivation cascade hypothesis of dementia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1